Effect of yeast culture combined with sodium monensin on the productivity and health of feedlot cattle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2025v46n1p329Keywords:
Carcass finishing, Digestibility of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, body weight gain, Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast culture.Abstract
The inclusion of ionophores and/or natural additives in animal feed, supplied alone or in combination, can bring benefits during the productive periods of beef cattle production. The experiment was conducted at the Animal Production Center (NUPRAN) facilities at the Master's Degree in Veterinary Sciences of the Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Sector of UNICENTRO, in Guarapuava, State of Paraná. The aim was to evaluate the productive performance, ingestive behavior, apparent digestibility of the concentrate, and carcass traits of steers finished in confinement receiving yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) combined or not with sodium monensin in the diet: MON–diet with sodium monensin (250 mg animal day-1); CUL–diet with yeast culture (7 g animal day-1); and MON + CUL–diet with yeast culture and sodium monensin (7 g animal day-1 + 250 mg animal day-1). Thirty-six whole steers, ½ Angus Nellore, with an average initial body weight of 416 kg, were used in the experiment. Steers fed yeast culture showed higher values for average weight gain (1.6144 kg day-1), improvements in carcass finishing, better capacity to convert ingested DM into carcass gain (9.34 day-1), apparent digestibility of DM (72.37%) and NDF (48.28%) compared to animals on sodium monensin. The combination demonstrated intermediate values for DMI (10.10 kg day-1), hindquarter fat thickness (6.67 mm), and rump fat thickness (5.24 mm). Sodium monensin resulted in intermediate values for DMD (71.73%), and forequarter fat thickness (3.58 mm). Using yeast culture promoted greater average weight gain, better carcass finishing, and better capacity to transform ingested DM into carcass gain, because of improvements in the apparent digestibility of DM and NDF compared to the diet with sodium monensin.
Downloads
References
Alves, Z., Melo, A., Figueiredo, A. R., Coimbra, M. A., Gomes, A. C., & Rocha, S. M. (2015). Exploring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae volatile metabolome: indigenous versus commercial strains. PLoS One, 1(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143641
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1995). Official methods of analysis (16nd ed.). AOAC.
Callaway, T. R., Edrington, T. S., Rychlik, J. L., Genovese, K. J., Poole, T. L., Jung, Y. S., Bischoff, K. M., Anderson, R. C., & Nisbet, D. J. (2003). Ionóforos: sua utilização como promotores de crescimento de ruminantes e impacto na segurança alimentar. Questões Atuais em Microbiologia Intestinal, 4(1), 43-51.
Carresi, C., Marabelli, R., Roncada, P., & Britti, D. (2024). Is the use of monensin another trojan horse for the spread of antimicrobial resistance?. Antibiotics, 13(2). doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13020129
Chen, M., & Wolin, M. J. (1979). Effect of monensin and lasalocid-sodium on the growth of methanogenic and rumen saccharolytic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 38(1), 72-77. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.1.72-77.1979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.38.1.72-77.1979
Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Sauvant, D. (2009). Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(4), 1620-1632. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1414
Dias, A. L. G., Freitas, J. A., Micai, B., Azevedo, R. A., Greco, L. F., & Santos, J. E. P. (2018). Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows. Journal Dairy Science, 101(1), 201-221. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-1324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13241
Oliveira, P. E. P. de, de Souza, A. M., Heker, J. C., Jr., Souza Sidor, F. de, Cristo, F. B., da Costa, L., Nascimento, M. Q.; Figueiredo, A. N.; Manzan, R. P. & Neumann, M. (2023). Saccharomyces cerevisiae como cultura de levedura com meio fermentativo melhora o desempenho de bovinos confinados. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 44(4), 1393-1408. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n4p1393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n4p1393
Domescik, E. J., & Martin, S. A. (1999). Effects of laidiomycin propionate and monensina on the in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. Journal of Animal Science, 56(8), 2305-2312. doi: 10.2527/1999.7782305x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7782305x
Duffield, T. F., Merrill, J. K., & Bagg, R. N. (2012). Metanálise dos efeitos da monensina em bovinos de corte sobre eficiência alimentar, peso corporal e consumo de matéria seca. Journal of Animal Science, 90(12), 4583-4592. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-5018
Erasmus, L. J., Coertzel, R. F., Leviton, M. N., & Chevaux, E. A. (2009). Meta-analysis of the effect of monensin or live yeast or a combination thereof on performance of beef cattle. Journal Animal Science, 87, 281. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-5018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-5018
Fernandes, L. O., D’aurea, A. P., Maciel, G. A., & Lucena, A. (2022). Novas conquistas na alimentação dos bovinos. In B. Cavechini (Ed.), Bovinos inovação, sustentabilidade e mercado do Brasil (pp. 108-133). São Paulo.
Ferreira, S., Guimarães, T., Moreira, K., Alves, V., Lemos, B., & Souza, F. (2013). Caracterização fecal de bovinos. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Medicina Veterinária, 11(20), 1-22.
Frumholtz, P. P., Newbold, C. J., Ørskov, E. R., & Wallace, R. J. (1992). Efeitos da monensina e/ou cultura de leveduras fornecidas na dieta ou infundidas no abomaso sobre a fermentação ruminal e concentrações de glicose, uréia, insulina, gastrina e colecistocinina no sangue de ovinos. Anais da Sociedade Britânica de Produção Animal, 1972, 213-213.
Gaggìa, F., Mattarelli, P., & Biavati, B. (2010). Probióticos e prebióticos na alimentação animal para produção segura de alimentos. Jornal Internacional de Microbiologia Alimentar, 141, S15-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031
Goering, H. K., & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fiber analysis: apparatus reagents, procedures and some applications. Agricultural Handbook.
Gonçalves, M. F., Martins, J. M. S., Oliveira, M. V., Carvalho, C. C. M., Antunes, M. M., Ferreira, I. C., & Olivalves, L. C. (2012). Ionóforos na alimentação de bovinos. Veterinária Notícias, 18(2), 131-146.
González, L. A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf‑Genswein, K. S., & Ferret, A. (2012). Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 172(1-2), 66-79. doi: 10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2011.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009
Halfen, J., Carpinelli, N., Del Pino, F. A. B., Chapman, J. D., Sharman, E. D., Anderson, J. L., & Osorio, J. S. (2021). Effects of yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance and rumen fermentation profile and microbial abundance in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(11), 11580-11592. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19996
Huebner, K. L., Martin, J. N., Weissend, C. J., Holzer, K. L., Parker, J. K., Lakin, S. M., Doster, E., Weinroth, D. M., Abdo, Z., Woerner, R. D., Metcalf, L. J., Geornaras, I., Bryant, C. T., Morley, S. P., & Belk, K. E. (2019). Efeitos de um produto de fermentação de Saccharomyces cerevisiae em abscessos hepáticos, microbioma fecal e resistoma em bovinos confinados criados sem antibióticos. Relatórios Científicos, 9(1), 2559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39181-7
Kawas, J. R., García-Castillo, R., Fimbres-Durazo, H., Garza-Cazares, F., Hernández-Vidal, J. F. G., Olivares-Sáenz, E., & Lu, C. D. (2007). Effects of sodium bicarbonate and yeast on nutrient intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation of light-weight lambs fed finishing diets. Small Ruminant Research, 67(2-3), 149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.09.010
Looper, M. L.; Stokes, S. R.; Waldner, D. N.; Jordan, E. R. (2001). Managingmilk composition: evalua tingherd potencial. New Mexico: Cooperative Extension Service College of Agricultureandhome Economics, New Mexico State University. Cooperative Extension Service.
Melo, L. D., Oliveira, P. E. P. D., Plodoviski, D. C., Costa, L. D., Rosa, C. B. D., Pereira, E. L. C., Souza, M. A., & Neumann, M. (2023). Supplementation of yeast culture combined with an enzyme complex in the diet for confined steers. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 24, 74470. doi: 10.1590/1809-6891v24e-74470P DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v24e-74470e
Meyer, N. F., Erickson, G. E., Klopfenstein, T. J., Greenquist, M. A., Luebbe, M. K., Williams, P., & Engstrom, M. A. (2009). Effect of essential oils, tylosin, and monensin on finishing steer performance, carcass characteristics, liver abscesses, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility. Journal of Animal Science, 87(7), 2346-2354. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1493
Mir, Z., & Mir, P. S. (1994). Effect of the addition of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on growth and carcass quality of steers fed high-forage or high-grain diets and on feed digestibility and in situ degradability. Journal of Animal Science, 72(3), 537-545. doi: 10.2527/1994.723537x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.723537x
Müller, L. (1987). Normas para avaliação de carcaças e concurso de carcaça de novilhos. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria.
Nagaraja, T. G., Newbold, C. J., Van Nevel, C. J., & Demeyer, D. I. (1997). Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. In P. N. Hobson, & C. S. Stewart (Eds.), Rumen microbial ecosystem (ed. Hobson, PN and Steward, CS), pp. 523-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_13
Pazdiora, R. D., Santos, A. P., Brondani, I. L., Restle, J., Arboitte, M. Z., & Cezimbra, I. M. (2009). Componentes não-integrantes da carcaça de novilhos jovens e superjovens terminados em confinamento. Acta Scientiarum, 31(1), 95-102. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i1.542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i1.542
Poppy, G. (2008). Understanding yeast enumeration important. Feedstufs, 80(40), 1-2.
Resende, K. T., Teixeira, I. A., & Fernandes, M. H. (2006). Metabolismo de energia. In T. T. Berchielli, A. V. Pires, & S. G. Oliveira (Eds.), Nutrição de ruminantes (pp. 311-331). São Paulo.
Samuelson, K. L., Hubbert, M. E., Galyean, M. L., & Löest, C. A. (2016). Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: the 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey. Journal of Animal Science, 94(6), 2648-2663. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0282
Shabat, S. K. B., Sasson, G., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Durman, T., Yaacoby, S., Berg Miller, M. E., White, B. A., Shterzer, N., & Mizrahi, I. (2016). Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. The ISME Journal, 10(12), 2958-2972. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.62
Shen, Y., Davedow, T., Ran, T., Saleem, A. M., Yoon, I., Narvaez, C., & Yang, W. (2019). Ruminally protected and unprotected Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 97(10), 4323-4333. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz270
Shurson, G. C. (2018). Yeast and yeast derivatives in feed additives and ingredients: sources, characteristics, animal responses, and quantification methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 235(1), 60-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.010
Silva, D. J., & Queiroz, A. C. (2009). Análise de alimentos, métodos químicos e biológicos. Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
Silva, T. I., Souza, J. M., Acedo, T. S., Carvalho, V. V., Perdigão, A., Silva, L. A., Silvestre, A. M., Niehues, M. B., Schleifer, W. F., Casali, D. M., Martins, C. L., Arrigoni, M. D. B., & Millen, D. D. (2023). Desempenho em confinamento e morfometria ruminal e cecal de bovinos Nelore alimentados com níveis crescentes de amido na dieta contendo uma mistura de óleos essenciais e amilase ou monensina. Fronteiras na Ciência Veterinária, 10, 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1090097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1090097
Statistical Analysis System (1993). SAS/STAT user’s guide: statistics (4nd ed.). SAS.
Swyers, K. L., Wagner, J. J., Dorton, K. L., & Archibeque, S. L. (2014). Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product as an alternative to monensin on growth performance, cost of gain, and carcass characteristics of heavy-weight yearling beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 92(6), 2538-2545. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7559
Tedesco, M. J., Gianello, C., Bissani, C. A., Bohnen, H., & Volhweiss, S. J. (1995). Análises de solo, plantas e outros materiais. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Vohra, A., Syal, P., & Madan, A. (2016). Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 219, 31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.019
Vyas, D., Uwizeye, A., Mohammed, R., Yang, W. Z., Walker, N. D., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2014). The effects of active dried and killed dried yeast on subacute ruminal acidosis, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in beef heifers1. Journal of Animal Science, 92(2), 724-732. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7072
Wagner, J. J., Engle, T. E., Belknap, C. R., & Dorton, K. L. (2016). Meta-analysis examining the effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on feedlot performance and carcass traits. The Professional Animal Scientist, 32(2), 172-182. doi: 10.15232/pas.2015-01438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2015-01438
Weiss, W. P., Conrad, H. R., & Pierre, N. R. S. (1992). A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 39(1), 95-110. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4
Whitley, N. C., Cazac, D., Rude, B. J., Jackson-O'Brien, D., & Parveen, S. (2009). Use of a commercial probiotic supplement in meat goats. Journal of Animal Science, 87(2), 723-728. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1031
Zhu, W., Wei, Z., Xu, N., Yang, F., Yoon, I., Chung, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2017). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8(36), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0167-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0167-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luísa da Costa Venancio, Paulo Eduardo Piemontez de Oliveira, Giuliano Pavani de Campos, Adriana Nogueira Figueiredo, Ricardo Pereira Manzano, Ellen Baldissera, Dayana Rochinski da Silveira Pinto, Mikael Neumann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.