Apresentação do Dossiê: Continuidades Esquecidas e Rupturas Construídas entre Ditaduras e Democracias

Ana Carina Azevedo

doi:10.5433/2176-6665.2023v28n2e48425

Autores/as

Ana Carina Azevedo Universidad de las Américas Puebla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2023v28n2e48425

Palabras clave:

Siglos XX y XXI, Metodología, Continuidades, Rupturas, Transiciones políticas

Resumen

Independientemente de la forma en que se procesen, los cambios de régimen político se analizan, por regla general, desde la perspectiva de la ruptura, sin prestar suficiente atención a los elementos de continuidad presentes en los más variados niveles. En este texto introductorio se abordan algunas de las cuestiones teóricas que subyacen a los estudios presentados en el dossier temático. Se destacan las cuestiones relacionadas con la división del tiempo histórico y los impactos de las opciones con respecto a la definición de puntos de referencia cronológicos para el trabajo de investigación; cuestiones que involucran las nociones de continuidad y cambio; y la centralidad de estos temas en los estudios sobre transiciones políticas. Se argumenta que la forma en que se interpreta el pasado depende de cómo estos temas sean o no incorporados y problematizados por los investigadores. Al final, se concluye que un análisis transversal entre regímenes políticos permite desdibujar rupturas ficticias e identificar continuidades ocultas, transformando nuestra comprensión del pasado y su impacto en el presente.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Ana Carina Azevedo, Universidad de las Américas Puebla

Doutora em História pela Universidade Nova de Lisboa (2014). Bolsista de Pós-Doutorado junto ao Centre for Functional Ecology – Science for People & the Planet da Universidade de Coimbra. Pesquisa financiada pela FCT, Portugal (SFRH/BPD/113250/2015). E-mail: aazevedo@fcsh.unl.pt

Citas

AGASSI, Joseph. Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science. Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 34, n. 4, p. 609-626, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2708892

BELAND, Daniel; POWELL, Martin. Continuity and change in social policy. Social Policy and Administration, Oxford, v. 50, n. 2, p. 129-147, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12207

BERKHOFER, Robert. A behavioral approach to historical analysis. New York: The Free Press, 1969.

BLACKBOURN, David. The horologe of time: periodization in history. PMLA, Cambridge, v. 127, n. 2, p. 301-307, mar. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2012.127.2.301

BRAUDEL, Fernand. Écrits sur l’histoire. Paris: Éditions Flammarion, 1985.

BRAUDEL, Fernand. History and the social sciences: the longue durée. Review, New York, v. 32, n. 2, p. 171-203, 2009.

BROWN, Marshall. Periods and resistances. MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly, Durham, v. 62, n. 4, p. 309-316, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-62-4-309

CARDOSO, Lucileide Costa. Construindo a memória do regime de 64. Revista Brasileira de História, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 27, p. 179-196, 1994.

CARR, Edward Hallet. O que é a história? Lisboa: Gradiva, 1986.

DINIZ, Elí. A transição política no Brasil: perspectivas para a democracia. Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, v. 1, n. 2, p. 65-88, 2022.

EVANS, Richard. Em defesa da história. Lisboa: Temas e Debates, 2000.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Réponse à une question. Esprit, Paris, n. 371, p. 850-873, maio 1968.

FRITZSCHE, Peter. Stranded in the present: modern time and the melancholy of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.

GALLO, Carlos Artur. A justiça das transições: uma proposta de análise para Portugal, Espanha, Argentina e Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, n. 38, p. 1-31, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2022.38.253850

GENRO, Tarso. Direito, constituição e transição democrática no Brasil. Brasília: Francis, 2010.

GEORGE, Lucian. Introduction. Periodization challenges and challenging periodization: interdisciplinary reflections. In: GEORGE, Lucian; MCGLYNN, Jade (org.). Rethinking period boundaries: new approaches to continuity and discontinuity in modern European history and culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2022. p. 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110636000-001

GERHARD, Dietrich. Periodization in European History. The American Historical Review, Washington, v. 61, n. 4, p. 900-913, jul. 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1848823

GERSCHENKRON, Alexander. On the concept of continuity in history. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, v. 106, n. 3, p. 195-209, jun. 1962.

GODINHO, Vitorino Magalhães. Teoria da História e Historiografia: devir e estrutura. In: CHAVES, Maria Adelaide (org.). Formas de pensamento em Portugal no século XV. Viseu: Livros Horizonte, 1970. p. 197-208.

GREEN, William. Periodization in European and World History. Journal of World History, Ogden, v. 3, n. 1, p. 13-53, 1992.

HARTOG, François. Regimes of historicity: presentism and experiences of time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/hart16376

HAYOT, Eric. Against periodization; or, on institutional time. New Literary History, Baltimore, v. 42, n. 4, p. 739-756, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2011.0039

HÖLSCHER, Lucian. The discovery of the future. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1999.

KARL, Terry Lynn. Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, New York, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-21, out. 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422302

KOSELLECK, Reinhart. The practice of conceptual history: timing history, spacing concepts. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619104

LA RASILLA, Ignacio de. The problem of periodization in the history of international law. Law and History Review, Cambridge, v. 37, n. 1, p. 275-308, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248018000445

LANDWEHR, Achim. Birth of the present: a history of time in the seventeenth century. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 2014.

LE GOFF, Jacques. Must we periodize history into periods? New York: Columbia University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/le-g17300

LE GOFF, Jacques. Les ‘retours’ dans l'historiographie française actuelle. Les Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques, [s.l.], n. 22, 1999. Disponível em: https://journals.openedition.org/ccrh/2322. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ccrh.2322

LEE, Richard. Lessons of the Longue Durée: the legacy of Fernand Braudel. Historia Crítica, Bogotá, n. 69, p. 69-77, jul. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit69.2018.04

LORENZ, Chris. ‘The times they are a-changin’: on time, space and periodization in history. In: CARRETERO, Mario; BERGER, Stefan; GREVER, Maria (ed.). Palgrave Handbook of research in historical culture and education. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2017. p. 109-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_6

MENDES, José. A história como ciência: fontes, metodologia e teorização. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1987.

MORLINO, Leonardo. Authoritarian legacies, politics of the past and the quality of democracy in southern Europe: open conclusions. In: PINTO, António Costa; MORLINO, Leonardo (eds.). Dealing with the legacy of authoritarianism: the “politics of the past” in Southern European democracies. London; New York: Routledge, 2011. p.165-187.

MORLINO, Leonardo. Del fascismo a una democracia débil: el cambio de régimen en Italia (1939-1948). In: SANTAMARIA, Julián (coord.). Transición a la democracia en el sur de Europa y América Latina. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1982. p. 93-150.

MUNCK, Gerardo; LEFF, Carol Skalnik. Modes of transition and democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, New York, v. 29, n. 3, p. 343-362, abr. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422125

PINTO, António Costa. Introduction: The authoritarian past and South European democracies: an introduction. In: PINTO, António Costa; MORLINO, Leonardo (ed.). Dealing with the legacy of authoritarianism: the “politics of the past” in Southern European democracies. London; New York: Routledge, 2011. p. 1-20.

POLLITT, Christopher; BOUCKAERT, Geert. Continuity and change in public policy and management. Cheltenham; Camberley; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.

REIS, Annelyze. Historiador: leitor do tempo. In: RAMOS, Francisco (org.). História, memória e historiografia. Sobral, CE: Sertão Cult, 2020. p. 439-446.

SANTAMARIA, Julián. Transición controlada y dificultades de consolidación: el ejemplo español. In: SANTAMARIA, Julián (coord.). Transición a la democracia en el sur de Europa y América Latina. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1982. p. 371-417.

SCHIFFMAN, Zachary. The birth of the past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.

SEELEIB-KAISER, Martin. Welfare State transformations in comparative perspective: shifting boundaries of ‘public’ and ‘private’ social policy. In: SEELEIB-KAISER, Martin (ed.). Welfare State transformations: comparative perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2008. p. 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227392_1

STEARNS, Peter. Periodization in world history teaching: identifying the big changes. The History Teacher, Long Beach, v. 20, n. 4, p. 561-580, ago. 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/493757

STREECK, Wolfgang; THELEN, Kathleen (ed.). Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

WAKABAYASHI, Judy. Time matters: conceptual and methodological considerations in translation timescapes. Chronotopos - A Journal of Translation History, Vienna, v. 1, n. 1, p. 22–39, 2019.

ZEHAVI, Amos. A reform less ordinary? Historical institutionalism, punctuated equilibrium, and mental health care privatization. Administration and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 44, n. 6, p. 731-753, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711412911