Mixed sorghum and forage cactus silage: composition, digestibility, fermentation, and losses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p929Keywords:
Ensiling, Nopalea cochenillifera L, Organic acids, Silage moisture.Abstract
The production of mixed silages can be an essential strategy for storing and processing feed for ruminants in arid and semi-arid regions. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of inclusion levels of forage cactus in sorghum silage on chemical-bromatological composition, losses, in vitro digestibility, and fermentative profile. Sorghum silages were produced by adding 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40% forage cactus based on natural matter. Experimental silos were filled with the mixtures and hermetically sealed. The silos were opened after 34 days of fermentation, and the samples were analyzed for composition, digestibility, fermentative profile, and losses in silage. The inclusion of forage cactus presented a negative quadratic influence (P < 0.05) on the contents of dry matter (DM), ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and cellulose of sorghum silage. The DM concentration decreased from 35.83 to 25.43% for the control treatment (0%) to the 20% treatment, followed by stabilization at values close to 26 ± 1% in subsequent levels. Digestibility in vitro and the total digestible nutrients of the silages increased linearly (P < 0.05) with the inclusion of forage cactus. However, there was a linear increase (P < 0.05) of pH, ammonia nitrogen, acetic acid, and butyric acid with the inclusion of forage cactus, reaching values indicative of the limitation of the fermentation process from the level of 20% inclusion. Including forage cactus in sorghum silage did not affect (P > 0.05) losses by gases, effluents, and DM recovery from silage. Adding up to 10% of forage cactus can benefit chemical-bromatological characteristics, digestibility, and fermentation of sorghum silage.
Metrics
References
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (2019). Official methods of analysis (vol. 3, 21nd ed.). AOAC.
Bailey, R. W. (1967). Quantitative studies of ruminant digestion. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1), 15-32. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1967.10423074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1967.10423074
Borges, L. da S., Peixoto, R. M., Pinedo, L. A., Santos, B. R. C. dos, Ribeiro, A. A., Oliveira, P. V. C. de, Amorim, D. S., Chacón, S. G., & Firmino, S. S. (2020). Caracterização bromatológica e perfil fermentativo de silagem de capim elefante misturada com ingredientes alternativos. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e897998207. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8207
Detmann, E., Silva, T. E., Valadares, S. de C., Fº., Sampaio, C. B., & Palma, M. N. N. (2016). Prediction of the energy value of cattle diets based on the chemical composition of feeds. In S. de C. Valadares Fº., L. F. C. e Silva, M. P. Gionbelli, P. P. Rotta, M. I. Marcondes, M. L. Chizzotti, & L. F. Prados (Eds.), Nutrient requirements of zebu and crossbred cattle (3nd ed., pp. 89-126). Viçosa, MG.
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J., & Emery, E. M. (1961). Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science, 44(9), 1768-1771. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6
Holden, L. A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 82(8), 1791-1794. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
Jobim, C. C., Nussio, L. G., Reis, R. A., & Schmidt, P. (2007). Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36(Suppl.), 101-119. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007001000013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007001000013
Kung, L., Jr., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018). Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 4020-4033. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909
Marques, O. F. C., Gomes, L. S. de P., Mourthé, M. H. F., Braz, T. G. dos S., & Pires, O. de S., Neto. (2017). Palma forrageira: cultivo e utilização na alimentação de bovinos. Caderno de Ciência Agrária, 9(1), 75-93.
Mertens, D. R. (1997). Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 80(7), 1463-1481. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2
Mizubuti, I. Y., Pinto, A. P., Ramos, B. M. de O., & Pereira, E. S. (2009). Métodos laboratoriais de avaliação de alimentos. EDUEL.
Moura, M. M. A., Pires, D. A. de A., Rodrigues, J. A. S., Sales, E. C. J. de, Costa, R. F., & Tolentino, D. C. (2016). Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 38(4), 369-373. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.31810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.31810
Muck, R. E., Nadeau, E. M. G., McAllister, T. A., Contreras-Govea, F. E., Santos, M. C., & Kung, L. (2018). Silage review: recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 3980-4000. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839
Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science, 18(2), 104-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
Valadares, S. de C., Fº., Lopes, S. A., Silva, B. de C., Chizzotti, M. L., & Bissaro, L. Z. (2018). Tabelas brasileiras de composição de alimentos para ruminantes. CQBAL4.0. http://www.cqbal.com.br
Voltolini, T. V., Miranda, J. E. C. de, Santos, R. D. dos, Muniz, E. N., Fernandes, E. N., & Magalhães, V. M. A. de. (2016). Palma forrageira na alimentação de bovinos leiteiros. EMBRAPA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.
