Effect of good handling on stress indicators and behaviour in beef cattle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n6p2517Keywords:
Animal welfare, Behaviour score, Cortisol, Flight distance, Glucose.Abstract
Aspects related to good handling practices have significant impacts on animal behaviour with positive effects on the productivity and profitability of production systems. This study investigated the impact of good handling practices on the modification of stress indicators and the behaviour of beef cattle. Thirty-six male castrated bovines at the growth stage were evaluated for 490 days and submitted to two different production systems in Southern Brazil: good handling practices (GHP) and a traditional handling system of beef-cattle farming (THS). Body weight, reactivity indicators (flight distance and composite behaviour score), and blood indicators of stress (glucose and cortisol) were measured. An analysis of variance was carried out with measurements repeated over time, and Pearson's correlation applied between the variables mentioned above. No differences were found (P>0.05) for body weight in any of the evaluations, with initial weights of 196.2 and 196.3 kg and final weights of 431.0 and 413.8 kg for the GHP and THS steers, respectively. The GHP determined better values for the stress and behavioural indicators compared to THS (P<0.05). The flight distance of the GHP animals decreased from 11.33 to 5.22 metres from the first to the last evaluation, while in the THS animals the values were 10.17 and 11.89 metres, respectively. The behaviour composite score differed in the evaluations at 372 and 490 days, with values of 1.77 and 1.47 for GHP animals and values of 2.92 and 2.83 points for THS animals, respectively. Glucose and cortisol levels decreased with the advancing evaluations in GHP animals, with values from 94.80 to 74.22 mg/dL and from 6.08 to 3.68 µg/dL, respectively. In THS animals, glucose and cortisol levels were similar in the initial and final evaluations, with values of 89.30 and 91.28 mg/dL and 5.34 and 5.80 µg/dL, respectively. Regardless of the handling, the final body weight of the animals correlated negatively with the reactivity indicators and physiological stress indicators. The reactivity of the cattle is influenced by the quality of the human-animal interaction but has no effect on the performance of animals raised on pasture. Good handling practices reduce the reactivity and stress indicators of cattle.
Downloads
References
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., Gonçalves, J. L. M., & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711-728. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Barbosa Silveira, I. D., Fischer, V., Farinatti, L. H. E., Restle, J., Alves, D. C., F., & Menezes, L. F. G. (2012). Relationship between temperament with performance and meat quality of feedlot steers with predominantly Charolais or Nellore breed. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41(6), 1468-1476. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000600022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000600022
Baumgard, L. H., & Rhoads, R. P. (2013). Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 1(1), 311-337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103644
Bethancourt-Garcia, J. A., Vaz, R. Z., Vaz, F. N., Restle, J., & Mendonça, F. S. (2019b). Pre-slaughter factors associated with severe bruising in different primary commercial cuts of bovine carcasses. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 50(4), 681-690. doi: 10.5935/1806-6690.20190080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20190080
Bethancourt-Garcia, J. A., Vaz, R. Z., Vaz, F. N., Silva, W. B., Pascoal, L. L., Mendonça, F. S., Vara, C. C. da., Nuñez, A. J. C., & Restle, J. (2019a). Pre-slaughter factors associated with severe bruising in different primary commercial cuts of bovine carcasses. Livestock Science, 222(1), 41-48. doi: 10.1016/J.LIVSCI.2019.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.009
Braga, J. S., Faucitano, L., Macitelli, F., Sant’Anna, A. C., Méthot, S., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2018). Temperament effects on performance and adaptability of Nellore young bulls to the feedlot environment. Livestock Science, 216(1), 88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.07.009
Brandão, A. P., & Cooke, R. F. (2021). Effects of temperament on the reproduction of beef cattle. Animals, 11(11), e3325. doi: 10.3390/ani11113325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113325
Brown-Brandl, T. M. (2018). Understanding heat stress in beef cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 47(1), e20160414. doi: 10.1590/rbz4720160414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720160414
Carvalho, C. C. S., Oliveira, E. M., Costa, M. D., Maranhão, C. M. A., Santos, T. C., Monção, F. P., Rocha, V. R., Jr., Ruas, J. R. M., & Soares, T. E. (2020). Handling, reactivity and price of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Behaviour Biometeorology, 8(2), 111-119. doi: 10.31893/jabb.20015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.20015
Ceballos, M. C., Góis, K. C. R., Sant’Anna, A. C., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2016). Frequent handling of grazing beef cattle maintained under the rotational stocking method improves temperament over time. Animal Production Science, 58(2), 307-313. doi: 10.1071/AN16025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16025
Ceballos, M. C., Sant’Anna, A. C., Boivin, X., Costa, F. O., Carvalhal, M. V. D. L., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2018). Impact of good practices of handling training on beef cattle welfare and stockpeople attitudes and behaviors. Livestock Science, 216(1), 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.019
Cobanovick, N., Stankovick, S. D., Dimitrijević, M., Suvajdžić, B., Grković, N., Vasilev, D., & Karabasil, N. (2020). Identifying physiological stress biomarkers for prediction of pork quality variation. Animals, 10(4), 1-18. doi: 10.3390/ani10040614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040614
Coleman, G. J., Hemsworth, P. H., & Hay, M. (1998). Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs from attitudinal and job-related variables and empathy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 58(1), 63-75. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01168-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01168-9
Francisco, C. L., Castilhos, A. M., Silva, D. C., Silva, F. M., Meirelles, P. R., Cooke, R. F., & Jorge, A.M. (2020). Temperament of Nelore growing steers receiving supplementation in grazing system: Performance, ultrasound measures, feeding behavior, and serum parameters. Livestock Science, 241(1), e104203. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104203
Francisco, C. L., Resende, F. D., Benatti, J. M. B., Castilhos, A. M., Cooke, R. F., & Jorge, A. M. (2015). Impacts of temperament on Nellore cattle: physiological responses, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 93(11), 5419-5429. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9411
Grandin, T. (2016). Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens. Veterinary and Animal Science, 2(1), 23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2016.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2016.11.001
Kilgour, R. J., Melville, G. J., & Greenwood, P. L. (2006). Individual differences in the reaction of beef cattle to situations involving social isolation, close proximity of humans, restraint and novelty. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99(2), 21-40. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.012
Mendonça, F. S., Vaz, R. Z., Cardoso, F. F., Restle, J., Vaz, F. N., Pascoal, L. L., Reimann, F. A., & Boligon, A. A. (2016). Pre-slaughtering factors related to bruises on cattle carcasses. Animal Production Science, 58(2), 385-392. doi: 10.1071/AN16177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16177
Mendonça, F. S., Vaz, R. Z., Vaz, F. N., Restle, J., Gonçalves, G. B., & Vara, C. C.V. (2017). Breed and carcass characteristics on losses by bruises and meat pH in beef of steers and culling cows. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 18(10), e-45295. doi: 10.1590/1089-6891v18e-45295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v18e-45295
Mendonça, F. S., Vaz, R.Z., Vaz, F. N., Leal, W. S., Silveira, I. D. B., Restle, J., Boligon, A. A., & Cardoso, F. F. (2019). Causes of bruising in carcasses of beef cattle during farm, transport, and slaughterhouse handling in Brazil. Animal Science Journal, 90(2), 288-296. doi: 10.1111/asj.13151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13151
Menezes, L. M., Barbosa-Silveira, I. D., & Cardoso, F. F. (2019). Temperamento, e genética em bovinos de corte: conceitos e resultados experimentais. Editora Novas Edições Acadêmicas. https://www.morebooks.de/shop-ui/shop/product/9786139756377
Moura, S. V., Barbosa Silveira, I. D., Ferreira, O. G. L., Mendonça, F. S., Moreira, S. M., Restle, J., Bethancourt-Garcia, J. A., & Vaz, R. Z. (2021). Lairage periods on temperament score and meat quality of beef cattle. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 56(1), e02349. doi: 10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02349
Mudroñ, P., Rehage, J., Sallmann, H. P., Höltershinken, M., & Scholz, H. (2005). Stress response in dairy cows related to different blood glucose. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 74(1), 37-42. doi: 10.2754/avb2005740 10037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200574010037
Neel, J. P. S., & Belesky, D. P. (2017). Herbage production, nutritive value and animal productivity within hardwood silvopasture, open and mixed pasture systems in Appalachia, United States. Grass and Forrage Science, 72(1), 137-153. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12211
Petherick, J. C., & Phillips C. J. C. (2009). Space allowances for confined livestock and their determination from allometric principles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 117(2), 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.09.008
Pinto, C. E., Carvalho, P. C. F., Frizzo, A., Fontoura, J. A. S., Jr., Nabinger, C., & Rocha, R. (2007). Ingestive behaviour of steers on natural grasslands of Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36(2), 319-327. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007000200007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007000200007
Romero, M. H., Uribe-Velásquez, L. F., Sánchez, J. A., Rayas-Amor, A. A., & Miranda-de La Lama, G. C. (2017). Conventional versus modern abattoirs in Colombia: Impacts on welfare indicators and risk factors for high muscle pH in commercial Zebu young bulls. Meat Science, 123(1), 173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.10.003
Sánchez-Hidalgo, M., Rosenfeld, C., & Gallo, C. (2019). Associations between pre-slaughter and post-slaughter indicators of animal welfare in cull cows. Animals, 9(9), 642-649. doi: 10.3390/ani9090642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090642
Sant’Anna, A. C., Baldi, F., Valente, T. S., Albuquerque, L. G., Menezes, L. M., Boligon, A. A., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2015). Genetic associations between temperament and performance traits in Nellore beef cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132(1), 42-50. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12117
Sant’Anna, A. C., Valente, T. D. S., Magalhães, A. F. B., Espigolan, R., Ceballos, M. C., Albuquerque, L. G., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2019). Relationships between temperament, meat quality, and carcass traits in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 97(12), 4721-4731. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz324
Valadez-Noriega, M., Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, M. C., Rayas-Amor, A. A., Sosa-Ferreyra, C. F., Galindo, F. M., & Miranda-de La Lama, G. C. (2020). Effects of greenhouse roofs on thermal comfort, behavior, health, and finishing performance of commercial zebu steers in cold arid environments. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 35(1), 54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2019.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2019.10.012
Valente, T. S., Albito, O. D., Sant’anna, A. C., Carvalheiro, R., Baldi, F., Albuquerque, L. G., & Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R. (2017). Genetic parameter estimates for temperament, heifer rebreeding, and stayability in Nellore cattle. Livestock Science, 206(1), 45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
