Courts, politics and law in Brazil. trends and issues for political science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2016v21n1p13

Keywords:

Politics, Judicialization, Law

Abstract

The protagonism of courts and other judicial institutions, changes in the working methods of jurists and the processes of mobilization of law are an unavoidable part of contemporary politics. The changes were welcomed as the awakening of the “third giant” or as the emergence of a new era of representative institutions, in which there would be a positive dynamic for the scope and effectiveness of rights in constitutional democracies. Others, more skeptical, pointed to the corporate interests of jurists, or their association with political and social forces as the explanatory basis for the changes. But, as research has pointed out, the process has an undeniable empirical variety, in different national contexts, within each State, in different domains, over time or depending on the configurations of forces placed in specific conjunctures. As a result, the theoretical and methodological bases for political science research on the courts, jurists and the law remain dispersed, fluid and contested, which is very clearly presented in the works in the area about our country. Mediações magazine has articles that contribute in this domain, either with theoretical-methodological discussions or with empirical research on institutions, agents and judicial practices in Brazil or in a comparative perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Celly Cook Inatomi, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP

PhD in Political Science from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP. Professor at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP.

Andrei Koerner, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP

Doctor in Political Science from the Universidade de São Paulo - USP. Professor at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP.

References

INATOMI, Celly C. A Atuação do Poder Judiciário nas Políticas de Erradicação do Trabalho Escravo Rural No Brasil Contemporâneo: Três Casos. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas: Unicamp, 2016.

INATOMI, Celly C. Abordagens teóricas na pesquisa empírica sobre o Poder Judiciário: diálogos, pontes, híbridos. In: KOERNER, Andrei (org.). Política e Direito na Suprema Corte norte-americana: debates teóricos e estudos de caso. Ponta Grossa, São Paulo: EDUEPG & EDUNESP, 2016 (no prelo).

MACIEL, Débora A; KOERNER, A. Sentidos da Judicialização: duas análises. Lua Nova. Revista de Cultura e Política, v.57, p.113–134, 2002.

KOERNER, Andrei; INATOMI, Celly; BARATTO, Márcia. Sobre o Judiciário e a Judicialização.In: MOTTA, Luís Eduardo Pereira da; MOTA, Maurício (Eds.). O Estado Democrático de Direito em Questão. Ed. Campus-Elsevier, 2010, p. 149-180.

MACIEL, Débora A.; INATOMI, Celly C. O Supremo Tribunal Federal na Ordem Constitucional Pós-88: debates na ciência política. In: SCALQUETTE, Ana Claudia Silva; NETO, Jose Francisco Siqueira. 60 Desafios do Direito - Política, Democracia e Direito. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013, p. 77-90.

MACIEL, Débora A.; INATOMI, Celly C. Política e Direito na Suprema Corte norte americana: debates teóricos e estudos de caso. Ponta Grossa, São Paulo: EDUEPG & EDUNESP, 2016.

Published

2016-06-19

How to Cite

COOK INATOMI, Celly; KOERNER, Andrei. Courts, politics and law in Brazil. trends and issues for political science. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 21, n. 1, p. 13–21, 2016. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2016v21n1p13. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/26870. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Dossier

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.