Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: an essay in comparative symbology

Authors

  • Victor Turner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2012v17n2p214

Keywords:

Comparative symbology, Rites, Plays, Liminal and liminoid, Culture

Abstract

Starting from the discussion of comparative symbology, which should not be confused with symbolic anthropology, the objective is to take the symbol as an event, not as a thing, for it has more to do with a semantic dimension, which refers to meaning in language and context. From this point of view, the ritual symbol becomes a factor of social action, with an innovative and creative potential of human action. Actions of expressive culture have character of dynamic semantic systems, gaining and losing meaning, since they "travel through" a rite or artwork. Among liminal and liminoid phenomena, rites and games, the subsystems of expressive culture are considered to reflect on the experiences of communitas and flow, when we observe the total involvement of the person in what he/she does.

Author Biography

Victor Turner

A partir da discussão da simbologia comparativa, que não deve ser confundida com a antropologia simbólica, ficando dela distante, objetiva-se tomar o símbolo como evento, e não como coisa, pois ele tem mais a ver com uma dimensão semântica, que remete ao significado na linguagem e no contexto. Desse ponto de vista, o símbolo ritual torna-se um fator de ação social, com um potencial criador ou inovador da ação humana. As ações de cultura expressiva possuem caráter de sistemas semânticos dinâmicos, ganhando e perdendo significados, pois “viajam através” de um rito ou obra de arte. Entre fenômenos liminares e liminoides, ritos e brincadeiras, pensam-se os subsistemas da cultura expressiva para refletir sobre as experiências de communitas e de flow (fluxo), quando observamos o envolvimento total da pessoa naquilo que ela faz.

References

ABRAHAMS, Roger; BAUMAN, Richard.Ranges of Festival Behavior. In: SYMPOSIUM ON FORMS OF SYMBOLIC INVERSION. AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 6., 1972, Toronto. Anals. Toronto, dec. 1. 1972.

BARTHES, Roland. Elements of Semiology. London: Jonathan Cape, 1967.

BEAL, Samuel. Travel of Fah-Hian and Sung-Yun.London: Susil Gupta, 1964. Primeira Edição, 1869.

ALCSIKSZENTMIHYI, Mihaly. Flow:Studies of Enjoyment. University of Chicago, PHS Grant Report, 1974.

ALCSIKSZENTMIHYI, Mihaly. Play and Intrinsic Reward. Journal of Humanistic Psycology, 1975. Páginas do manuscrito não publicado, 1972.

ALCSIKSZENTMIHYI, Mihaly. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The experience of Play in Work and Games. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

DANIELOU, Alain. Hindu Polytheism. New York: Bollinger Foundation, 1964.

DUMAZEDIER, Joffre. Le Loisir et la ville. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1962.

DUMAZEDIER, Joffre. Article on “Leisure”. In: SILLS, David (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, p. 248-253, 1968.

GENNEP, Arnold van. The Rites of Passage.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960. Primeira Edição, 1909.

GRAZIA, Sebastian de. Of Time, Work, and Leisure. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.

GURVITCH, Georges. Mass, Community, Communion. Journal of Philosophy. August, 1941.

NIKHILANANDA, Swami. The Bhagavad Gita. New York: Ramakrisna-Vivekananda Center, 1969.

NORBECK, Edward. Man at Play. Play, a Natural History Magazine Supplement, p. 48-53, dec. 1971.

PIAGET, Jean. Play, Dream, and Imitation. New York: Norton, 1962.

SINGER, Milton. When a Great Tradition Modernizes. New York: Prarger, 1972.

SUTTON-SMITH, Brian. Games of Order and Disorder. In: SYMPOSIUM ON FORMS OF SYMBOLIC INVERSION. AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, Toronto, December 1, 1972.

TURNER, Victor. Schism and Continuity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1957.

TURNER, Victor. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967.

TURNER, Victor. The Ritual Process. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.

TURNER, Victor. Drama, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1974.

WATSON, William. Social Mobility and Social Class in Industrial Communities. In: GLUCKMAN, Max (ed.), Closed Systems and Open Minds. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1965.

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

TURNER, Victor. Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: an essay in comparative symbology. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 17, n. 2, p. 214–257, 2012. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2012v17n2p214. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/14343. Acesso em: 16 aug. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles