Effect of synbiotics on performance and gut health in broiler chickens submitted to an enteric challenge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n5p1367Keywords:
Performance enhancers, Microbiome, Synbiotics.Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nutritional program free of performance enhancers when compared to a program using synbiotics, in both enteric challenge and non-challenge conditions, on the intestinal health and performance of broiler chickens. A total of 864 one-day-old male Cobb broiler chicks were used. The birds were distributed in a completely randomized design, using a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (2 diets × 2 health conditions), resulting in 4 diets with 12 replications of 18 birds per cage, totaling 48 experimental units. The diets used were control diet (Diet A); control diet + synbiotic (Diet B); Diet A + enteric challenge; and Diet B + enteric challenge. At 14 days old, an enteric challenge was applied with a commercial coccidiosis vaccine (20 times the manufacturer's recommended dose), followed by inoculation with Escherichia coli (ATCC® 8739™). The enteric challenge resulted in worse performance in all the phases assessed and changed the intestinal mucosa morphology five days after the challenge. At 28 days old, two weeks after the enteric challenge, a regenerative process was already occurring. Supplementation with synbiotics improved the feed conversion of the 28-day-old birds, regardless of the experimental challenge. Synbiotic supplementation resulted in greater tensile strength, hardness, and elasticity of the jejunal mucosa. These results indicate that it is possible to improve productivity using alternative additives, even in experimental environments where variables are controlled and free from challenges that compromise animal welfare and health.
Downloads
References
Aleixo, V. M., Pressinoiti, L. N., Campos, D. V. S., & Menezes-Aleixo, R. C. (2011). Histologia, histoquímica e histometria do intestino de jacaré-do-Pantanal criado em cativeiro. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 31(12), 1120-1128. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2011001200014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2011001200014
Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (2021). Relatório anual ABPA 2021. ABPA. http://abpa-br.org/mercados/#relatorios.
Ciurescu, G., Dumitru, M., Gheorghe, A., Untea, A. E., & Drahici, R. (2020). Effect of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, bone mineralization, and bacterial population of broilers fed with different protein sources. Poultry Science, 99(11), 5960-5971. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.075
Clavijo, V., & Florez, M. J. V. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poultry Science, 97(3), 1006-1021. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex359
El-Sawah, A. A., Dahshirasn, A. L. H., El-Nahass, E., & El-Mawgoud, A. E. (2018). Pathogenicity of Escherichia coli O157 in commercial broiler chickens. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 620-625. doi: 10.1016/j.bjbas.2018.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2018.07.005
Gadde, U. D., Oh, S., Lillehoj, H. S., & Lillehoj, E. P. (2018). Antibiotic growth promoters virginiamycin and bacitracin methylene disalicylate alter the chicken intestinal metabolome. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22004-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22004-6
Gottardo, E. T., Prokoski, K., Hord, D., Viott, A. D., Santos, T. C., & Fernandes, J. I. M. (2016). Regeneration of the intestinal mucosa in Eimeria and E. coli challenged broilers suplemented with amino acids. Poultry Science, 95(5), 1056-1065. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev356
He, X., Lu, Z., Ma, B., Zhang, L., Li, J., Jiang, Y., Li, J., Jiang, Y., Zhou, G. H., & Gao, F. (2018). Effects of chronic heat exposure on growth performance, intestinal epithelial histology, appetite-related hormones and genes expression in broilers. Journal Science Food and Agriculture, 98(12), 4471-4478. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8971
Hmani, H., Daoud, L., Jlidi, M., Jalleli, K., Ali, M. B., Brahim, A. H., Bargui, M., & Dammak, A. (2017). A Bacillus subtilis strain as probiotic in poultry: selection based on in vitro functional properties and enzymatic potentialities. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 44(8), 1157-1166. doi: 10.1007/s10295-017-1944-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-017-1944-x
Hofacre, C. L., Reynolds, D., Mathis, G., Bretts, L., Ollis, N., & Smith, J. (2019). Effect of a competitive exclusion culture in a necrotic enteritis challenge model in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28(2), 350-355. doi: 10.3382/japr/pfy078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy078
Iseri, V. J., & Klasing, K. C. (2014). Changes in the amount of lysine in protective proteins and immune cells after a systemic response to dead Escherichia coli: implications for the nutritional costs of immunity. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 54(5), 922-930. doi: 10.1093/icb/icu111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icu111
Keerqin, C., Morgan, N., Wu, S. B., Swick, R. A., & Choct, M. (2017). Dietary inclusion of arabinoxylo- oligosaccharides in response to broilers challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis. British Poultry Science, 58(4), 418-424. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1327705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1327705
Kisielinski, K., Willis, S., & Prescher, A. (2002). A simple new method to calculate small intestine absorptive surface in the rat. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2(3), 131-135. doi: 10.1007/s102380200018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s102380200018
Leite, P. R. S. C., Oliveira, H. B., Souza, V. B. L., Rocha, F. O., & Oliveira, T. H. (2020). Probiotic and synbiotic in broiler diet: performance and Enterobacteriaceae. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 72(6), 2365-2372. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-12035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12035
Lekshmi, M., Ammini, P., Kumar, S., & Varela M. F. (2017). The food production environment and the development of antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens of animal origin. Microorganisms, 5(11), 1-15. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5010011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5010011
Ma, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Gao, J., Wu, S., & Qi, G. (2018). Supplemental Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 manipulates intestinal structure and microbial composition in broiler chickens. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 15358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33762-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33762-8
Markowiak, P., & Slizewska, K. (2018). The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathogens, 10(21), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0
Morales-Barrera, E., Calhoun, N., Lobato-Tapia, J. L., Lucca, V., & Prado-Rebolledo, O. (2016). Risks involved in the use of enrofloxacin for Salmonella enteritidis or Salmonella heidelberg in commercial. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 31(3), 1-7. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00072
Nakphaichit, M., Thanomwongwattana, S., Phraephaisarn, C., Sakamoto, N., Keawsompong, S., Nakayama, J., & Nitisinprasert, S. (2011). The effect of including Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 during post-hatch feeding on the growth and ileum microbiota of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 90(12), 2753-2765. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01637
Ohland, C. L., & MacNaughton, W. K. (2010). Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epitelial barrier function. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 298(6), 807-819. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00243.2009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00243.2009
Paiva, D., & Mcelroy, A. (2014). Necrotic enteritis: applications for the poultry industry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(3), 557-566. doi: 10.3382/japr.2013-00925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00925
Pourabedin, M., Guan, L., & Zhao, X. (2015). Xylo-oligosaccharides and virginiamycin differentially modulate gut microbial composition in chickens. Microbiome, 3(15), 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0079-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0079-4
Rodrigues, F. A. P., Medeiros, P. H. Q. S., Prata, M. M. G., & Lima, A. A. M. (2016). Fisiologia da barreira epitelial intestinal. In R. B. Oriá, & G. A. C. Brito (Orgs.), Sistema digestório: integração básico-clínica (Cap 18, pp. 441-477). São Paulo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580391893-18
Rostagno, H. S., Albino, L. F. T., Hannas, M. I., Donzele, J. L., Sakomura, N. K., Perazzo, F. G., Saraiva, A., Teixeira, M. L., Rodrigues, P. B., Oliveira, R. F., Barreto, S. L. T., & Brito, C. O. (2017). Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
Schafer, K. A. (1998). The cell cycle: a review. Veterinary Pathology, 35(6), 461-478. doi: 10.1177/030098589803500601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030098589803500601
Statistical Analysis System Institute (2002). System for Microsoft Windows, Release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc.
Uni, Z., Platin, R., & Sklan, D. (1998). Cell proliferation in chicken intestinal epithelium occurs both in the crypt and along the villus. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 168(4), 241-247. doi: 10.1007/s003600142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003600050142
Wang, G., Huang, S., Wang, Y., Cai, S., Yu, H., Liu, H., Zeng, X., Zhang, G., & Qiao, S. (2019) Bridging intestinal immunity and gut microbiota by metabolites. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 76(20), 3917-3937. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03190-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03190-6
Wang, H., Ni, X., Qing, X., Liu, L., Lai, J., Khalique, A., Li, G., Pan, K., Jing, B., & Zeng, D. (2017). Probiotic enhanced intestinal immunity in broilers against subclinical necrotic enteritis. Frontiers in Immunology, 8(20), 1592. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01592
Whelan, R. A., Doranalli, K., Rinttilä, T., Vienola, K., Jurgens, G., & Apajalahti, J. (2018). The impact of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 on the pathology, performance, and intestinal microbiome of broiler chickens in a necrotic enteritis challenge. Poultry Science, 98(9), 3450-3463. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey500
Zommiti, M., Chikindas, M. L., & Ferchichi, M. (2020). Probiotics live biotherapeutics: a story of success, limitations, and future prospects not only for humans. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 12(3), 1266-1289. doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-09570-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09570-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alisson Gustavo Rotter, Bruna Cereda de Oliveira da Rosa, Ana Paula Müller Fernandes, Eduarda Pires Simões, André Natã Pinto, Anderson Reuter, Lucas Pedro de Souza Glaser, Jovanir Inês Müller Fernandes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
