The programmatic discourses of political parties in Latin America: class identity and economic policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2011v16n1p201Keywords:
Political parties, Class identity, Social democratic economic policies, Latin America.Abstract
This article develops a comparative analysis of the contemporary programmatic discourse of 19 left-wing political parties in Latin America, including 15 countries. Four concerns guide the development of this research: (a) is the identification with the working class present in the ideological bases of these parties? (b) do these parties advocate a social-democratic economic agenda?, (c) is there a relationship between class identity and the proposition of social democratic policies, and (d) is there a pattern in the programmatic discourse of the Latin American left-wing parties today? Focusing on the 2000s, the research resorts to the government programs published by the parties and holds brief discussions with the theoretical literature in the fields covered. The research found elements to infer the existence of a positive relationship between the emphasis on the working class and the proposition of an economic policy oriented by social-democratic values, as well a common pattern that brings together a significant group of Latin American political parties.Downloads
References
DUVERGER, Maurice. Os partidos políticos. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1970.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University, 1998.
KITSCHELT, Herbet. Class structure and social democratic party strategy. British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge, n. 23, p. 299-337, 1993.
KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter; Hofferbert, Richard I; Budge, Ian. Parties, policies, and democracy. Oxford: Westview, 1994.
LIPSET, Seymour Martin; ROKKAN, Stein. Estruturas de clivagem, sistemas partidários e alinhamentos de eleitores. In: LIPSET, Seymour Martin. Consenso e conflito: ensaios de sociologia política. Lisboa: Gradiva, 1992. p. 161-259.
MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friederich. Manifesto do partido comunista. Lisboa: Avante, 1997.
MAY, John D. Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, n. 21, p. 135-51, 1973.
NOTERMANS, Ton. Money, markets, and state: social democratic economic policies since 1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2000.
OLIVEIRA, Augusto Neftali Corte de. Partidos e política social no Brasil e no Chile. Revista Debates, Porto Alegre, v. 3, n. 2, p. 39-67, 2009.
PREZEWORSKI, Adam. Capitalismo e social-democracia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989.
REIS, Guilherme Simões. A social-democracia do MAS: nem revolução, nem populismo na Bolívia. In: ENCONTRO ANUAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PÓSGRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS, 34., 2010, Caxambu. Anais... Disponível em: http://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=90. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2011.
RODRICK, Dani. Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature, Pittsburgh, v. 44, n. 4, p. 973-987, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on articles published in Mediações belongs to the author(s): in the case of partial or entire republication of the original publication, we ask author(s) to indicate the original publication in the periodical.
Mediações uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows Open Access, enabling any user to read, download, copy and disseminate its content so long as adequately referenced.
The opinions expressed by the author(s) are their sole responsibility.