The “enemy combatants” and Bush administration: relations among executive, legislative and judiciary branches between 2001-2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2011v16n2p72Keywords:
Terrorism, Guantánamo, Bush administration, Enemy combatant.Abstract
The terrorist attacks against WTC in 2001 allowed the world to review its expectations regarding the post Cold War World of a society based on values such as market economy and liberal democracy. This paper aims to understand how domestic institutions were affected by this event. It assumes that although September 11th event does not constitute an element of disruption the established order in the domestic level, it allowed, for a brief period of time, to establish an unbalanced relation between Executive, Legislative and Judiciary Powers, in which Executive was preponderant. This balance was restored by the decisions taken by the U.S. Supreme Court, which are also object of analysis in this work.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
AMANN, Diane M. Guantánamo. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, New York, v. 42, p. 263-348, 2004.
DOYLE, Michael. W. Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1151-1169, dec. 1986.
ELLIS, Richard (ed.) Judging executive power. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009.
JERVIS, Robert. Understanding the Bush Doctrine. Political Science Quarterly, New York, v. 118, n. 3, p. 365-388, 2003.
SINGH, Robert. The Bush doctrine. In: BUCKLEY, Mary; SINGH, Robert (ed.). The Bush doctrine and the war on terrorism: global responses, global consequences. London: Routledge, 2006. p. 12-31.
SODER, Kirsten. The Supreme Court, the Bush administration and Guantanamo bay. SIPRI Background Paper: Solna, Suécia, jan. 2009.
SPIRO, Peter J. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. 126 S. Ct. 2749. American Journal of International Law. Washington, v. 100, n. 4, p. 888-895, oct. 2006.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House Joint Resolution 64 (H.J.Res.64). Final Vote results for Roll Call 342. Bill Title: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks lauched against the United States. Washington, D.C., 14 sep. 2001a.
UNITED STATES. Senate. Joint Resolution 23 (S.J.Res. 23).Final Vote results for Roll Call 0281. Bill Title: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks lauched against the United States. Washington, D.C., 14 sep. 2001b.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House of Representatives 3162 (H.R.3162). Final Vote results for Roll Call 398. Bill Title: USA PATRIOT Act.Washington, D.C., 24 oct. 2001c. Disponível em: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll398.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate. Senate 313. (S. 313). Final Vote results for Roll Call 313. Bill Title: USA PATRIOT Act. Washington, D.C.. 25 oct., 2001d. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote107/vote_107_1_00313.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 542 U.S. 466, 2004. Shafiq Rasul et al v. George W. Bush. Rapporteur: Minister John Paul Stevens, Washington, D.C.: 28 jun. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-334.ZS.html. Acesso em: 15 out. 2008.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives 2863 (H.R.2863). Final Vote results for Roll Call 669. Bill Title: appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. Washington, D.C., 19 dec. 2005a. Disponível em http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll669.xml. Acesso em 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate 0359. (S. 0359). Final Vote results for Roll Call 0359. Bill Title: appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. Washington, D.C., 19 dec. 2005b. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1091/vote_109_1_00359.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House of Representatives 6166 (H.R.6166). Final Vote results for Roll Call 491. Bill Title: Military Commissions Act. Washington, D.C., 27 sep. 2006a. Disponível em: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll491.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate 259. (S. 259). Final Vote results for Roll Call 259. Bill Title: Military Comission Act of 2006. Washington, D.C., 28 sep. 2006b. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote109/vote_109_2_00259.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 548 U.S. 557, 2006. Salim Ahmed Hamdan v. Donald H. Rumsfeld. Rapporteur: Minister John Paul Stevens, Washington, D.C.: 29 jun. 2006c. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-184.ZO.html. Acesso em 15/10/2008.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 553 U.S. 723, 2008. Lakhdar Boumediene et al v. George W. Bush. Rapporteur: Minister Anthony M. Kennedy, Washington, D.C.: 12 jun. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html. Acesso em: 15 out. 2008.
VELASCO E CRUZ, Sebastião C. Entre normas e fatos: desafios e dilemas da ordem internacional. Lua Nova, São Paulo, n. 58, p. 169-192, 2003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452003000100009. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2011.
DOYLE, Michael. W. Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1151-1169, dec. 1986.
ELLIS, Richard (ed.) Judging executive power. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009.
JERVIS, Robert. Understanding the Bush Doctrine. Political Science Quarterly, New York, v. 118, n. 3, p. 365-388, 2003.
SINGH, Robert. The Bush doctrine. In: BUCKLEY, Mary; SINGH, Robert (ed.). The Bush doctrine and the war on terrorism: global responses, global consequences. London: Routledge, 2006. p. 12-31.
SODER, Kirsten. The Supreme Court, the Bush administration and Guantanamo bay. SIPRI Background Paper: Solna, Suécia, jan. 2009.
SPIRO, Peter J. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. 126 S. Ct. 2749. American Journal of International Law. Washington, v. 100, n. 4, p. 888-895, oct. 2006.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House Joint Resolution 64 (H.J.Res.64). Final Vote results for Roll Call 342. Bill Title: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks lauched against the United States. Washington, D.C., 14 sep. 2001a.
UNITED STATES. Senate. Joint Resolution 23 (S.J.Res. 23).Final Vote results for Roll Call 0281. Bill Title: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks lauched against the United States. Washington, D.C., 14 sep. 2001b.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House of Representatives 3162 (H.R.3162). Final Vote results for Roll Call 398. Bill Title: USA PATRIOT Act.Washington, D.C., 24 oct. 2001c. Disponível em: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll398.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate. Senate 313. (S. 313). Final Vote results for Roll Call 313. Bill Title: USA PATRIOT Act. Washington, D.C.. 25 oct., 2001d. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote107/vote_107_1_00313.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 542 U.S. 466, 2004. Shafiq Rasul et al v. George W. Bush. Rapporteur: Minister John Paul Stevens, Washington, D.C.: 28 jun. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-334.ZS.html. Acesso em: 15 out. 2008.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives 2863 (H.R.2863). Final Vote results for Roll Call 669. Bill Title: appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. Washington, D.C., 19 dec. 2005a. Disponível em http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll669.xml. Acesso em 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate 0359. (S. 0359). Final Vote results for Roll Call 0359. Bill Title: appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. Washington, D.C., 19 dec. 2005b. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1091/vote_109_1_00359.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. House of Representatives. House of Representatives 6166 (H.R.6166). Final Vote results for Roll Call 491. Bill Title: Military Commissions Act. Washington, D.C., 27 sep. 2006a. Disponível em: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll491.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Senate 259. (S. 259). Final Vote results for Roll Call 259. Bill Title: Military Comission Act of 2006. Washington, D.C., 28 sep. 2006b. Disponível em: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote109/vote_109_2_00259.xml. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2010.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 548 U.S. 557, 2006. Salim Ahmed Hamdan v. Donald H. Rumsfeld. Rapporteur: Minister John Paul Stevens, Washington, D.C.: 29 jun. 2006c. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-184.ZO.html. Acesso em 15/10/2008.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. 553 U.S. 723, 2008. Lakhdar Boumediene et al v. George W. Bush. Rapporteur: Minister Anthony M. Kennedy, Washington, D.C.: 12 jun. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html. Acesso em: 15 out. 2008.
VELASCO E CRUZ, Sebastião C. Entre normas e fatos: desafios e dilemas da ordem internacional. Lua Nova, São Paulo, n. 58, p. 169-192, 2003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452003000100009. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2011.
Downloads
Published
2012-11-16
How to Cite
PACHECO, Cristina Carvalho. The “enemy combatants” and Bush administration: relations among executive, legislative and judiciary branches between 2001-2008. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 16, n. 2, p. 72–88, 2012. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2011v16n2p72. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/10251. Acesso em: 2 oct. 2024.
Issue
Section
Dossier
License
Copyright on articles published in Mediações belongs to the author(s): in the case of partial or entire republication of the original publication, we ask author(s) to indicate the original publication in the periodical.
Mediações uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows Open Access, enabling any user to read, download, copy and disseminate its content so long as adequately referenced.
The opinions expressed by the author(s) are their sole responsibility.
