Intake, ruminal parameters and plasmatic urea concentration in beef cattle fed diets with different levels of sunflower cake in substitution to the cotton meal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1059Keywords:
Sugar cane. Ammonia nitrogen. Steer. pHAbstract
The objective of this study was to assess the effects of five substitution levels of cotton meal by sunflower cake in the concentrate ration, on dry matter intake (DMI), pH and ammonia nitrogen (N-NH3) in the rumen liquid and plasmatic urea in beef steers. The diets were isoprotein (13.0% CP) and isoenergetic (72.0% TDN). In natura sugarcane silage was the only ronghage (40% DM). Five 1/2 Simental x Nelore, castrated males were used, with average weight of 380 kg and 24 months old, all fistulated in the rumen. The treatments were: 0% sunflower cake (TG0); 25% sunflower cake (TG25); 50% sunflower cake (TG50); 75% sunflower cake (TG75); and 100% sunflower cake (TG100), based on DM, substituting cotton meal (FA). The experiment was carried out in a 5x5 Latin square experimental design, with five animals and five periods. Each experimental period lasted 15 days. The dry matter intake (DMI) presented significant difference (P < 0.05), showing that substituting cotton meal by sunflower cake resulted in lower DM intake, but this substitution did not (P > 0.05) alter the pH and N-NH3 values of the rumen liquid and plasmatic urea values. It was concluded that sunflower cake can be used in substitution to the cotton meal when mean daily gains are expected, since in high levels of substitution it caused a decrease in DMI.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
