Evaluation of nutritional plans for meat quail

Authors

  • Dirceu Neuztzling Griep Júnior Universidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Adriana Aparecida Pereira Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Dorgival Morais de Lima Júnior Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Rosineide Silva de Alcântara Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Wilson Araújo da Silva Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Socorro da Silva Moraes Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Vitor Visintin Silva de Almeida Universidade Federal de Alagoas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p821

Keywords:

Animal performance, Carcass, Economic viability.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated three nutritional plans for quail from 1 to 42 days of age on performance, carcass quality, and economic viability. A total of 210 European quail were distributed into three treatments in a randomized complete design with five replicates and 14 birds in each plot. The following three treatments were tested: nutritional plan 1 - one diet, provided from 1 to 42 days of age; nutritional plan 2 - two diets, provided from 1 to 21 and 22 to 42 days of age; and nutritional plan 3 - three diets, provided from 1 to 14, 15 to 35, and 36 to 42 days of age. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and means were compared by the Student Newman Keuls (SNK) test at the 5% probability level. At 42 days of age, one bird from each sex, of each experimental unit, was slaughtered to evaluate the yields of carcass, breast, legs, and abdominal fat. Nutritional plans per rearing stage with two or three diets provided similar production performances and better feed conversion than the plan including only one diet. Studied carcass characteristics did not differ between treatments. The nutritional plan with three diets provided the best economic viability. The best nutritional plan for meat quail was that containing three types of diet, because it provided a lower cost with feed per kilogram of quail produced without compromising performance or carcass characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dirceu Neuztzling Griep Júnior, Universidade Federal de Sergipe

Discente de Mestrado em Zootecnia da Universidade Federal de Sergipe, UFS, Campus São Cristóvão, Aracaju, SE, Brasil.

Adriana Aparecida Pereira, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Prof., Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, AL, Brasil.

Dorgival Morais de Lima Júnior, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Prof., Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, AL, Brasil.

Rosineide Silva de Alcântara, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Discente de Mestrado em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal, UFAL, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, CECA, Rio Largo, AL, Brasil.

Wilson Araújo da Silva, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Discente de Mestrado em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal, UFAL, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, CECA, Rio Largo, AL, Brasil.

Socorro da Silva Moraes, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Discente de Mestrado em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal, UFAL, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, CECA, Rio Largo, AL, Brasil.

Vitor Visintin Silva de Almeida, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Prof., Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, AL, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-02

How to Cite

Griep Júnior, D. N., Pereira, A. A., Lima Júnior, D. M. de, Alcântara, R. S. de, Silva, W. A. da, Moraes, S. da S., & Almeida, V. V. S. de. (2017). Evaluation of nutritional plans for meat quail. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 38(2), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p821

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.