Sodium monensin or propolis extract in the diet of crossbred (½ Red Angus vs. ½ Nellore) bulls finished in feedlot: chemical composition and fatty acid profile of the Longissimus muscle

Autores

  • Maribel Velandia Valero Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Fernando Zawadzki Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Mônica Chaves Françozo Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Mariana de Souza Farias Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Polyana Pizzi Rotta Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Ivanor Nunes Prado Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Jesuí Vergílio Visantainer Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Lúcia Maria Zeoula Universidade Estadual de Maringá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4p1617

Palavras-chave:

CLA, Cholesterol, Fatty acid, Ionophores, Meat quality.

Resumo

This work was carried out to evaluate the chemical composition and the fatty acid profile of the Longissimus muscle of crossbred bulls (F1 – ½ Red Angus x ½ Nellore) with an initial average age of 20 months old and an initial average weight of 393 ± 24 kg finished in feedlot. Three treatments (Control – CON, Sodium monensin – MON and Propolis extract – PRO) were evaluated. The animals were kept in feedlot for 70 days and slaughtered at an average weight of 498 ± 25 kg. They were fed with corn silage (roughage), cracked corn, soybean meal, urea, limestone and mineral salt. The roughage:concentrate ratio was 50:50. The bulls were fed twice daily, at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. The chemical composition and the fatty acid profile of the Longissimus muscle was measured between the 12th and 13th ribs. The inclusion of additives (sodium monensin or propolis extract) did not influence (P > 0.05) the chemical composition (moisture, crude protein, ashes, total lipids and total cholesterol) of the animals’ Longissimus muscle. Therefore, diet has little effect on fatty acid composition of the Longissimus muscle of bulls. However, the percentage of C18:2 n-6 fatty acid was lower (P < 0.05) as a percentage of total fatty acids in the CON diet in comparison to the MON and PRO diets. On the contrary, the percentage of C22:6 n – 3 fatty acid was higher (P < 0.05) as a percentage of total fatty acids in the CON diet in comparison to the PRO diet. However, diet did not influence (P > 0.05) polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, saturated fatty, n-6, or n-3 fatty acids or the ratio of PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 fatty acids.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Maribel Velandia Valero, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Post-Graduate student. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá.

Fernando Zawadzki, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Post-Graduate student. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá.

Mônica Chaves Françozo, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Post-Graduate student. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá.

Mariana de Souza Farias, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Post-Graduate student. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá.

Polyana Pizzi Rotta, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Post-Graduate student. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá.

Ivanor Nunes Prado, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

PhD, Prof. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá. Av. Colombo, 5790. CEP 87020-900. Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. Fellowship of CNPq IA.

Jesuí Vergílio Visantainer, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

PhD, Prof. Department of Chemistry. State University of Maringá.

Lúcia Maria Zeoula, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

PhD, Prof. Department of Animal Science. State University of Maringá. Av. Colombo, 5790. CEP 87020-900. Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. Fellowship of CNPq.

Downloads

Publicado

2011-10-17

Como Citar

Valero, M. V., Zawadzki, F., Françozo, M. C., Farias, M. de S., Rotta, P. P., Prado, I. N., Visantainer, J. V., & Zeoula, L. M. (2011). Sodium monensin or propolis extract in the diet of crossbred (½ Red Angus vs. ½ Nellore) bulls finished in feedlot: chemical composition and fatty acid profile of the Longissimus muscle. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 32(4), 1617–1626. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4p1617

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

1 2 3 > >>