Causalidade e mecanismos em ciência política
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2013v18n2p10Palabras clave:
Causalidade, Mecanismos, Inferência, Desenho de pesquisaResumen
Esse artigo defende que os desenhos de empíricos de pesquisa em Ciência Política devem ser formatados com o objetivo de produzir inferências causais falsificáveis. Inferir no sentido de utilizar informações disponíveis para apresentar conclusões a respeito de informações indisponíveis. Causais de modo que a ocorrência de altere a probabilidade de ocorrência de. E falsificáveis no sentido de que a inferência pode ser demonstrada falsa por um desenho de pesquisa concorrente. Além disso, as explicações devem identificar o mecanismo causal que conecta variável dependente e variável independente.Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
BLALOCK, Hubert M. Causal inferences, closed populations, and measures of association. American Political Science Review, Baltimore, v. 61, n. 1, p. 130-136, 1967.
BRADY, Henry; COLLIER, David (Org.). Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
BRAMBOR, Thomas; CLARK, William R.; GOLDER Matt. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, Oxford, v. 14, n. 1, p. 63-82, 2006.
BUNGE, Mario. Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Science, New York, v. 27, n. 4, p. 410-465, 1997.
CAMPBELL, Donald; STANELY, Julian. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally, 1996.
DEAN, Angela M.; VOSS, Daniel. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Springer, 1999.
DELLA PORTA, Donatella; KEATING, Michael (Ed.). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
ELSTER, Jon. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
FIGUEIREDO FILHO, Dalson; SILVA JUNIOR, José Alexandre; ROCHA, E. O que fazer e o que não fazer com a regressão: pressupostos e aplicações do modelo linear de mínimos quadrados ordinários (MQO). Política Hoje, Recife, v. 20, n. 1, 44-99, 2011.
FRIEDRICH, Robert J. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, Austin, v. 26, n. 4, p. 797-833, 1982.
GERRING, John. Social science methodology: a criterial framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
GERRING, John. Causation: a unified framework for the Social Sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, London, v.17, n. 2, p.163-98, 2005.
HEDSTRÖM, Peter; SWEDBERG, Richard. Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. In: HEDSTRÖM, Peter; SWEDBERG, Richard. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
HOLLAND, Paul. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Baltimore, v. 81, p. 945-60, 1986.
JACCARD, James; TURRISI, Robert; WAN, Choi. Interaction efects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
KITSCHELT, Hebert. Accounting for postcommunist regime diversity: what counts as a good cause? In: EKIERT, Grzegorz; HANSON, Stephen E. (Ed.). Capitalism and democracy in central and eastern europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 49-86.
KUHH, Thomas. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1975.
MAHONEY, James. Path-Dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, Sant Louis, v. 36, p. 111–141, 2001.
MARSH, David; FURLONG, Paul. A skin not a sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science. In: MARSH, David; STOKER, Gerry. (Ed.). Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. p. 17-44.
MERTON, R. Social theory and social structure. NewYork: The Free Press, 1968.
MONTGOMERY, Douglas. Design and analysis of experiments. 5 th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
PEARL, Judea. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
RATTON JUNIOR, Jose Luiz; MORAIS, Jorge Ventura de. Para ler Jon Elster: limites e possibilidades da explicação por mecanismos nas Ciências Sociais. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, v. 46, n. 2, p. 385-410, 2003.
RUBIN, Donald B. Estimating causal efects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Arlington, v. 66, n. 5, p. 688-701, 1974.
SALMON, Wesley. Scientific explanation: three basic conceptions. Proceedings of the biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Symposia and Invited Papers, Chicago, v. 2, p. 293-305, 1984.
SANDERS, David. Behaviouralism. In: MARSH, David; STOKER, Gerry (Ed.). Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. p. 45–64.
SHADISH, R.; COOK, T.; CAMPBELL. Experimental and quasi-experimental Designs of generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur. The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Waterloo, v. 21, n. 3, p. 367-388, 1991.
TILLY, Charles. Mechanisms in political process. Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, v. 4, p. 21-41, 2001.
VAN EVERA, Stephen. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.
ZALD, Mayer N. Progress and cumulation in the human sciences after the fall. Sociological Forum, New York, v. 10, n. 3, p. 455-479, 1995.
BRADY, Henry; COLLIER, David (Org.). Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
BRAMBOR, Thomas; CLARK, William R.; GOLDER Matt. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, Oxford, v. 14, n. 1, p. 63-82, 2006.
BUNGE, Mario. Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Science, New York, v. 27, n. 4, p. 410-465, 1997.
CAMPBELL, Donald; STANELY, Julian. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally, 1996.
DEAN, Angela M.; VOSS, Daniel. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Springer, 1999.
DELLA PORTA, Donatella; KEATING, Michael (Ed.). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
ELSTER, Jon. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
FIGUEIREDO FILHO, Dalson; SILVA JUNIOR, José Alexandre; ROCHA, E. O que fazer e o que não fazer com a regressão: pressupostos e aplicações do modelo linear de mínimos quadrados ordinários (MQO). Política Hoje, Recife, v. 20, n. 1, 44-99, 2011.
FRIEDRICH, Robert J. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, Austin, v. 26, n. 4, p. 797-833, 1982.
GERRING, John. Social science methodology: a criterial framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
GERRING, John. Causation: a unified framework for the Social Sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, London, v.17, n. 2, p.163-98, 2005.
HEDSTRÖM, Peter; SWEDBERG, Richard. Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. In: HEDSTRÖM, Peter; SWEDBERG, Richard. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
HOLLAND, Paul. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Baltimore, v. 81, p. 945-60, 1986.
JACCARD, James; TURRISI, Robert; WAN, Choi. Interaction efects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
KITSCHELT, Hebert. Accounting for postcommunist regime diversity: what counts as a good cause? In: EKIERT, Grzegorz; HANSON, Stephen E. (Ed.). Capitalism and democracy in central and eastern europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 49-86.
KUHH, Thomas. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1975.
MAHONEY, James. Path-Dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, Sant Louis, v. 36, p. 111–141, 2001.
MARSH, David; FURLONG, Paul. A skin not a sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science. In: MARSH, David; STOKER, Gerry. (Ed.). Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. p. 17-44.
MERTON, R. Social theory and social structure. NewYork: The Free Press, 1968.
MONTGOMERY, Douglas. Design and analysis of experiments. 5 th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
PEARL, Judea. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
RATTON JUNIOR, Jose Luiz; MORAIS, Jorge Ventura de. Para ler Jon Elster: limites e possibilidades da explicação por mecanismos nas Ciências Sociais. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, v. 46, n. 2, p. 385-410, 2003.
RUBIN, Donald B. Estimating causal efects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Arlington, v. 66, n. 5, p. 688-701, 1974.
SALMON, Wesley. Scientific explanation: three basic conceptions. Proceedings of the biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Symposia and Invited Papers, Chicago, v. 2, p. 293-305, 1984.
SANDERS, David. Behaviouralism. In: MARSH, David; STOKER, Gerry (Ed.). Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. p. 45–64.
SHADISH, R.; COOK, T.; CAMPBELL. Experimental and quasi-experimental Designs of generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur. The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Waterloo, v. 21, n. 3, p. 367-388, 1991.
TILLY, Charles. Mechanisms in political process. Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, v. 4, p. 21-41, 2001.
VAN EVERA, Stephen. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.
ZALD, Mayer N. Progress and cumulation in the human sciences after the fall. Sociological Forum, New York, v. 10, n. 3, p. 455-479, 1995.
Descargas
Publicado
2013-12-30
Cómo citar
BRITTO FIGUEIREDO FILHO, Dalson; ROCHA, Enivaldo Carvalho da; SILVA JÚNIOR, José Alexandre da; PARANHOS, Ranulfo. Causalidade e mecanismos em ciência política. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 18, n. 2, p. 10–27, 2013. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2013v18n2p10. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/17664. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.
Número
Sección
Dossier
Licencia
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Mediations son del autor; En caso de republicación parcial o total de la primera publicación, se solicita a los autores que indiquen la publicación original en la revista.
Mediações utiliza la licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, que proporciona acceso abierto, permitiendo a cualquier usuario leer, descargar, copiar y difundir su contenido, siempre que esté debidamente referenciado.
Las opiniones emitidas por los autores de los artículos son de su exclusiva responsabilidad.
