Evaluation of two liver biopsy and rectal sealing techniques in dog cadavers undergoing Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by transrectal access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p449Keywords:
Adhesive, Experimental study, Liver, Rectal access, Rectum, Surgery.Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate two liver biopsy techniques by transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and compare tensiometric parameters of rectal sealing using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue or conventional rectal sutures in a dog cadaver model. In sixteen dog cadavers two liver biopsy techniques were performed via transrectal NOTES using either polypectomy diathermy forceps or endoscopic oval biopsy forceps. The cadavers were divided into two groups: Glue Group (GG) where rectal sealing was performed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue and Suture Group (SG) with the rectal defect sealed with simple continuous extracorporeal 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The rupture pressure of the seals was measured on a rectal burst test. The diathermy polypectomy endoscopic forceps biopsy technique was significantly faster (p<0.001) and provided larger diameter samples. Rectal sealing was significantly faster (p<0.001) in the GG. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to rupture pressure (258.5 mmHg) with air insufflation. Using endoscopic oval biopsy forceps, biopsy samples can only be collected from the surface of the liver, whereas polypectomy forceps with a diathermy loop can be used to collect samples from the tip of the hepatic lobe. There was no difference in rectal rupture pressure in the burst test between the cadavers where sealing was performed with rectal sutures and those where cyanoacrylate adhesive was used.
Metrics
References
Akça, O., Zargar, H., Autorino, R., Brandao, L. F., Gürler, A. S., Avşar, A., Horuz, R., & Albayrak, S. (2015). The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model. Turkish Journal of Urology, 41(2), 78-82. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.40336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2015.40336
Alcaraz, A., Peri, L., Molina, A., Goicoechea, I., Garcia, E., Izquierdo, L., & Ribal, M. J. (2009). Feasibility of transvaginal NOTES-Assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. European Urology, 57(2), 233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.025
Boersema, G. S. A., Vennix, S., Wu, Z., Hekkert, M. T. L., Duncker, D. G. M., Lam, K. H., Menon, A. G., Gert-Jan Kleinrensink, G., & Lange, J. F. (2017). Reinforcement of the colon anastomosis with cyanoacrylate glue: a porcine model. Journal of Surgical Research, 217, 84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.001
Borie, E., Rosas, E., Kuramochi, G., Etcheberry, S., Olate, S., & Weber, B. (2019). Oral applications of Cyanoacrylate adhesives: a literature review. BioMed Research International, 2019, 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2019/8217602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8217602
Bravo, A. A., Sheth, S. G., & Shopra, S. (2001). Liver biopsy. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(7), 495-500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102153440706
Chen, C. (2012). The art of bowel anastomosis. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 101(4), 238-240. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4582-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/145749691210100403
Heibel, M., Dietz, U. A., Malafaia, O., Czeczko, N. G., Araujo, U. R., & Inacio, C. M. (2006). Influência do Alprostadil na cicatrização da anastomose de esôfago cervical - estudo em cães. Arquivo Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, 19(4), 123-32.
Hjortrup, A., Nordkild, P., Christensen, T., Sjontoft, E., & Kjaerdaardt, J. (1989). Rectal anastomosis with application of luminal fibrin adhesive in the rectum of dogs - an experimental study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 32(5), 422-425. doi: 10.1007/BF02563696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563696
Irkorucu, O., Ucan, B. H., Cakmak, G. K., Tascilar, O., Emre, A. U., Ofluoglu, E., Bahadir, B., Karakaya, K., Demirtas, C., Pasaoglu, H., Ankarali, H., & Comert, M. (2009). Effect of 2-Octyl-Cyanoacrylate on ischemic anastomosis of the left colon. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 22(3), 188-194. doi: 10.1080/08941930902866261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941930902866261
Kazzi, M. G., & Silverberg, M. (2013). Pediatric tongue laceration repair using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®). Journal of Emergency Medicine, 45(6), 846-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.004
Koruda, M. J., & Rolandelli, R. H. (1990). Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomosis. Journal of Surgery Research, 48(5), 504-15. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(90)90021-s DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(90)90021-S
Lima, E., Rolanda, C., Pêgo, J. M., Henriques-Coelho, T., Silva, D., Carvalho, J. L., & Correia-Pinto, J. (2006). Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: a novel 5 mm port for intra-abdominal scarless surgery. Journal of Urology, 2(176), 802-805. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.075
Mantzoros, I., Kanellos, I., Demetriades, H., Christoforidis, E., Kanellos, D., Pramateftakis, M. G., Zaraboukas, T., & Betsiset, D. (2004). Effects of steroid on the healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Techniques in Coloproctology, 8(1), 180-183. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0150-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-004-0150-9
Neuberger, J., & Cain, O. (2021). The need for alternatives to liver biopsies: non-invasive analytics and diagnostics. Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research, 2021(13), 59-69. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S278076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S278076
Perera, A. G. M., & Tavarez, M. M. (2024). 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate. In A. G. M. & M. M. Tavarez (Eds.), StatPearls- National Library of Medicine (pp. 1-5). StatPearls Publishing Press https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK532293/
Rattner, D., & Kalloo, A. (2006). ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. Sugical Endoscopy, 20(2), 329–333. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-3006-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-3006-0
Rothuizen, J., & Twedt, D. C. (2009). Liver biopsy techniques. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice, 39(3), 469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.02.006
Ryou, M., & Thompson, C. C. (2008). Techniques for transanal access to the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 18(2), 245-260. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.01.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2008.01.014
Saxena, A. K., & Willital, G. H. (1999). Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in the repair of pediatric extremity lacerations. American Surgeon, 65(5), 470-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000313489906500520
Senft, J. D., Carstensen, B., Mischnik, A., Warschkow, R., Müller-Stich, B. P., & Linke, G. R. (2016). Endolumenal colon occlusion reduces peritoneal contamination during a transrectal NOTES procedure: a controlled porcine survival study. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(7), 2946-2950. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4582-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4582-2
Shapiro, A. J., Dinsmore, R. C., & North, J. H., Jr. (2001). Tensile strength of wound closure with cyanoacrylate glue. American Surgeon, 67(11), 1113-1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480106701118
Soares-Júnior, C., Souza, C., Gomes, C. A., & Soares, F. P. T. P. (2010). Intervening factors and methods to assess gastrointestinal anastomoses. Arquivo Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, 20(3), 354-358.
Trindade, A. B., Beck, C. A. C., Ataíde, M. W., Schiochet, F., Gerardi, D. G., Brun, M. V., Driemeier, D., Zlotowski, P., Cardoso, M. R. I., Cirne-Lima, E. O., & Contesini, E. A. (2015). Transrectal endoscopy with three different techniques of rectal suture associate: NOTES survival study with liver biopsy in a swine model. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 67(4), 1188-1192. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-7893 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-7893
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.
