Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle

Authors

  • Aury Nunes de Moraes Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Doughlas Regalin Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Mauro Augusto dos Santos Médico Veterinária Autônomo
  • Bruna Ditzel da Costa Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Fabíola Niederauer Flores Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Nilson Oleskovicz Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481

Keywords:

Peridural, Cattle, Local anesthetic, a2 agonists, Local block.

Abstract

Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aury Nunes de Moraes, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Prof. Dr. do Deptº de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, UDESC, Lages, SC.

Doughlas Regalin, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Discente de Pós-graduação do Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciência Animal, UDESC, Lages, SC.

Mauro Augusto dos Santos, Médico Veterinária Autônomo

Médico Veterinário Autônomo, Joaçaba, SC.

Bruna Ditzel da Costa, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Discente de Pós-graduação do Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciência Animal, UDESC, Lages, SC.

Fabíola Niederauer Flores, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Profª Drª do Deptº de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Roraima, UFRR, Boa Vista, RR.

Nilson Oleskovicz, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Anestesiologia Veterinária.

Published

2014-09-04

How to Cite

Moraes, A. N. de, Regalin, D., Santos, M. A. dos, Costa, B. D. da, Flores, F. N., & Oleskovicz, N. (2014). Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 35(4Supl), 2481–2490. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.