Identifying Classes of Actors Through Variable Network Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2022v27n3e45723Keywords:
Correlational class analysis, Analysis of social networks, network variables, shared meanings, relationalityAbstract
Social network analysis involves identifying actors (people, companies, countries, among others) who are represented by nodes, and their respective relationships (friendship, communication, economic exchanges, etc.), represented by edges. The network can be segmented based on the presence or strength of relationships, forming groups of similar or cohesive actors. In many cases, we seek the similarity of actors not through social relationships but through sharing attitudes, beliefs, or opinions, which leads to the use of conventional variables. In this article, we propose using Correlational Class Analysis (CCA) to assess the Brazilian voter's political belief system, which, in turn, is captured through attitudinal variables. In our study, the method was used to identify classes of similar actors by evaluating their responses regarding four dimensions of political beliefs based on Converse's model. Based on a survey of 1,417 respondents, we identified three schematic classes (Group Interest, Ideologues, and Quasi-Ideologues) representing actors who share common beliefs about party politics. The method we present here contributes to a new way of assessing the similarity between actors considering shared beliefs or opinions, something limited to conventional methods of analyzing social networks.
Downloads
References
AßFALG, André; ERDFELDER, Edgar. Maximum likelihood consensus analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Austin, v. 44, n. 1, p. 189-201, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0138-0
BALDASSARRI, Delia; GELMAN, Andrew. Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in american public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 114, n. 2, p. 408- 446, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
BALDASSARRI, Delia; GOLDBERG, Amir. Neither ideologues nor agnostics: alternative voters’ belief system in an age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 120, n. 1, p. 45-95, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/676042
BAQUERO, Marcelo. O desencanto com a democracia: análise do comportamento eleitoral dos gaúchos nas eleições de 1994. Opinião Pública, Campinas, v. 2, n. 2, p. 73-94, 1994.
BARABÁSI, Albert-lászló. Linked: the new science of networks. Philadelphia: Perseus Books Group, 2003.
BORSBOOM, Denny; DESERNO, Marie K.; RHEMTULLA, Mijke; EPSKAMP, Sacha; FRIED, Eiko I.; MCNALLY, Richard J.; ROBINAUGH, Donald J.; PERUGINI, Marco; DALEGE, Jonas; CONSTANTINI, Giulio; ISVORANU, Adela-Maria; WYSOCKI, Anna C.; BORKULO, Claudia D. van; WALDORP, Lourens J. Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, London, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
BOUTYLINE, Andrei. Improving the measurement of shared cultural schemas with correlational class analysis: theory and method. Sociological Science, [s. l.], v. 4, p. 353–393, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a15
BOUTYLINE, Andrei; VAISEY, Stephen. Belief network analysis: a relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 122, n. 5, p. 1371-1447, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/691274
CONVERSE, Philip E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review, Cambridge, v. 18, n. 1-3, p. 1-74, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
DIMAGGIO, Paul. Culture and cognition. Annual review of sociology, San Mateo, v. 23, n. 1, p. 263-287, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
DIMAGGIO, Paul; SOTOUDEH, Ramina; GOLDBERG, Amir; SHEPHERD, Hana. Culture out of attitudes: relationality, population heterogeneity and attitudes toward science and religion in the US. Poetics, [s. l.], v. 68, p. 31-51, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2017.11.001
EMIRBAYER, Mustafa. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 103, n. 2, p. 281-317, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
ESEB – ESTUDO ELEITORAL BRASILEIRO. Brazilian electoral survey 2014. Campinas: Cesop, 2014. Disponível em http://www.cesop.unicamp.br. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2022.
FIELD, Andy. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 5ed. London: Sage publications, 2017. FREEMAN, Linton. The development of social network analysis. a study in the sociology of science. Charleston: Booksurge Publishing, 2004.
GERBER, Isaiah. The organizational landscape of white supremacy. 2019. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em sociologia), The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2019. GOLDBERG, Amir. Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: the case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 116, n. 5, p. 1397- 1436, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/657976
GOODMAN, Leo Aria. Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Durham, v. 32, n. 1, p. 148-170, 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
HAIR JUNIOR, Joseph F.; BLACK, William C.; BABIN, Barry J.; ANDERSON, Rolph E. Multivariate data analysis. 8. ed. Stanford: Cengage, 2018.
HUNZAKER, Mary Beth; VALENTINO, Lauren. Mapping cultural schemas: from theory to method. American Sociological Review, Menasha, v. 84, n. 5, p. 950-981, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419875638
JENNRICH, Robert I. An asymptotic χ2 test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, New York, v. 65, n. 330, p. 904-912, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481133
LAPOP – LATIN AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION PROJECT. The political culture of democracy in the Americas: a comparative study of democracy and governance. Nashville: Vanderbilt University, 2017.
MACEDO, Roberta de Cássia; MARTINS, Ricardo Silveira; ROSSONI, Luciano; MARTINS, Guilherme Silveira. Confiança nos relacionamentos em cluster de empresas. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, v. 57, n. 4, p. 330-341, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020170404
MARSHALL, Emily; SHEPHERD, Hana. Attitudinal change and contraceptive use: development of shared cultural models of fertility. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, Montréal. Proceedings […]. Montréal: American Sociological Association, 2017.
MARTIN, John Levi. Power, authority, and the constraint of belief systems. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 107, n. 4, p. 861-904, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/343192
MARTIN, John Levi. The relation of aggregate statistics on beliefs to culture and cognition. Poetics, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 5-20, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00010-3
MCDONNELL, Erin Metz; STOLTZ, Dustin S.; TAYLOR, Marshall. Multiple market moralities: identifying distinct patterns in how consumers evaluate the fairness of price changes. SocioEconomic Review, Oxford, v. 35, n. 2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa034
MIRANDA, Shaila M.; KIM, Inchan; SUMMERS, Jama D. Jamming with social media: how cognitive structuring of organizing vision facets affects it innovation diffusion. MIS Quarterly, Minneapolis, v. 39, n. 3, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.04
MOHR, John W. Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, San Mateo, v. 24, n. 1, p. 345-370, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345
MOHR, John W.; WHITE, H. C. How to model an institution. Theory and Society, London, v. 37, n. 5, p. 485-512, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9066-0
PIPIS, George. Simpson’s paradox and misleading statistical inference. Predictive [‘hacks’], [s.l.], 28 nov. 2020. Disponível em: https://predictivehacks.com/simpsons-paradox-example/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2022.
RAWLINGS, Craig M.; CHILDRESS, Clayton. Emergent meanings: reconciling dispositional and situational accounts of meaning-making from cultural objects. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 124, n. 6, p. 1763-1809, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/703203
ROSSONI, Luciano; GONÇALVES, Clayton Pereira; SILVA, Mônica Pereira da; GONÇALVES, Alex Ferreira. Mapping organizational culture schemas based on correlational class analysis: a tutorial. Journal of Contemporary Administration, Maringá, v. 25, n. 1, p. e200096, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200096
SIMPSON, Edward Hugh. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), Malden, v. 13, n. 2, p. 238-241, 1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x
STRAUSS, Claudia; QUINN, Naomi. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. VAN ECK, Ness Jan; WALTMAN, Ludo. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523-538, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
WILLEKENS, Marta; DAENEKINDT, Stijin. Cultural logics and modes of consumption: unraveling the multiplicity of symbolic distinctions among concert audiences. Musicae Scientiae, London, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1029864920908305, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864920908305
WU, Angela Xiao. Ideological polarization over a China as superpower mindset: an exploratory charting of belief systems among chinese internet users, 2008-2011. International Journal of Communication, Los Angeles, v. 8, p. 2243–2272, 2014.
ZIZEK, Slavoj. Violência: seis reflexões laterais. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Luciano Rossoni, Clayton Pereira Gonçalves, Alex Ferreira Gonçalves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on articles published in Mediações belongs to the author(s): in the case of partial or entire republication of the original publication, we ask author(s) to indicate the original publication in the periodical.
Mediações uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows Open Access, enabling any user to read, download, copy and disseminate its content so long as adequately referenced.
The opinions expressed by the author(s) are their sole responsibility.