Interobserver and inter-cycle variability in the electrocardiographic assessment of dogs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n1p177Keywords:
Heart rate, Electrocardiogram, Level of experience, Observation errors.Abstract
Abstract: The electrocardiogram, which graphically records the phases of the cardiac cycle, plays a crucial role in diagnosing arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities. However, the reliability of results can be significantly affected by the level of expertise of the evaluator. Acknowledging potential discrepancies in interpretations of the same electrocardiographic readings across different cardiac cycles and between analysts of varying experience, this study aimed to assess the interobserver and inter-cycle variability in electrocardiographic exams of dogs. This retrospective research was carried out at the Veterinary Hospital Superintendency Unit of the Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Realeza Campus, PR, Brazil. The study involved a random selection of electrocardiographic records from 50 dogs, collected between September 2018 and December 2019, without discrimination based on breed, sex, age, or weight. Various parameters were analyzed, including heart rate and rhythm; durations of P waves; QRS complexes; PR and QT intervals; amplitudes of P, R, and T waves; and both atrial and ventricular electrical axes. The data underwent Shapiro-Wilk normality testing, with parametric data analyzed via analysis of variance and Tukey's test, and non-parametric data assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's tests. The final step involved applying the Kappa Agreement Coefficient Test to the data. The findings revealed variability in heart rhythm interpretation, with disagreement between evaluators of low to intermediate experience levels. Specifically, low-level evaluators tended to underestimate maximum heart rates, recording a median rate of 105, compared to 122 by high-level evaluators (p=0.0100). Additionally, P wave durations were consistently overestimated by low- and intermediate-level evaluators, who reported median durations of 52 and 51, respectively, against 48 by their highly experienced counterparts (p=0.0064). No significant differences emerged in analyses comparing a single cardiac cycle to either three cycles or the average of three cycles. The study highlighted the impact of evaluator expertise on the variability of electrocardiographic interpretations, particularly concerning P wave duration, for which the evaluators tended to overestimate measurements, and the degrees of agreement, which did not represent their experience level. The findings stress the importance of training and routine practice in electrocardiographic examinations to mitigate the risk of mistaken interpretations and analyses.
Downloads
References
Arias, G. B., Oliveira, M. K. G., Schnitzer, J. F., Di Santis, G. W., Martins, M. I. M., & Gava, F. N. (2021). Eletrocardiografia computadorizada em cadelas com tumores mamários. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 49(1821), 1-6. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.114172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.114172
Bagardi, M., Manfredi, M., Zani, D. D., Brambilla, P. G., & Locatelli, C. (2021). Interobserver variability of radiographicmethods for the evaluation of left atrial size in dogs. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 62(2), 161-174. doi: 10.1111/vru.12930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12930
Berte, B., Duytschaever, M., Elices, J., Kataria, V., Timmers, L., Heuverswyn, F. V., Stroobandt, R., Neve, J. D, Watteyne, K., Vandensteen, E., Vandekerckhove, Y., & Tavernier, R. (2015). Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram based screening protocols. European Society of Cardiology, 17(9), 1435-1440. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu385
Bombardelli, M. M. L., Champion, T., Fischborn, J. C. J., & Gusso, A. B. F. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of the electrocardiogram for detection of atrial and ventricular overloads in dogs. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 49(1803), 1-8. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.105274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.105274
Dilaveris, P., Batchvarov, V., Gialafos, J. & Malik, M. (1999), Comparison of Different Methods for Manual P Wave Duration Measurement in 12-Lead Electrocardiograms. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 22, 1532-1538. doi 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00358.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00358.x
Dores, H., Santos, J. F., Dinis, P., Costa, F. M., Mendes, L., Monge, J., Freitas, A., Gonçalves, P. A., Cardim, N., & Mendes, M. (2017). Variabilidade na interpretação do eletrocardiograma do atleta: mais uma limitação na avaliação pré-competitiva. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia, 36(6), 443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2016.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2016.07.013
Ferreira, G. B., Filippi, M. G., Paes, A. C., & Lourenço, M. L. G. (2017). Avaliação eletrocardiográfica em cães com erliquiose monocítica. Revista de Educação Continuada em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia do CRMV-SP, 15(2), 38-44. doi: 10.36440/recmvz.v15i2.37335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36440/recmvz.v15i2.37335
Figueiredo, V. C., Pereira, C. S., Muzzi, R. A. L., Borges, J. C., Muzzi, L. A. L., Oberlender, G., Oliveira, M. M., & Abreu, C. B. (2016). Importância da eletrocardiografia como um exame pré-cirúrgico em cães. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 36(11), 1091-1094. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2016001100006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016001100006
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. International Biometric Society, 33(2), 363-374. doi: 10.2307/2529786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
Leroy, C., Conchou, F., Layssol-lamour, C., Deviers, A., Sautet, J., Concordet, D., & Mogicato, G. (2013). Normal canine prostate gland: repeatability, reproducibility, observer-dependent variability of ultrasonographic measurements of the prostate in healthy intact beagles. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia, 42(5), 355-361. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12022
Macêdo, H. J. R., Silva, J. M. C., Mendes, I. L., Lopes, R. V., Vasconcelos, A. L. C. F., & Almeida, A. P. (2019). Principais alterações no eletrocardiograma em cães. Ciência Animal, 29(3), 38-49. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/vti-25877
Martin, D. (2007) The Complete Study Guide to Learning the Electrocardiogram. Mind-Forge Education Services.
Mendes, T. G., Sousa, P. R., Moura, R. S., & Carvalho, R. O. A. (2019). Biomarcadores cardíacos e sua aplicabilidade clínica em cães e gatos. Enciclopédia Biosfera, 16(29), 412-436. doi: 10.18677/EnciBio_2019A31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18677/EnciBio_2019A31
Oliveira, L. S., Santos, R. R. B., Melo, M. B., Laranjeira, D. F., & Barrouin-Melo, S. M. (2013). Eletrocardiografia computadorizada em cães: estudo comparativo. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 33(7), 949-953. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2013000700018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2013000700018
Porsani, M. Y. H., Oliveira, L. E. D., Muzzi, R. A. L., & Abreu, C. B. (2020). Variabilidade interobservador entre três métodos de eletrocardiografia (convencional, digital e digital impresso) em gatos saudáveis. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 48(1761), 1-6. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.97775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.97775
Santilli, R., Perego, M., Sydney, M., & Pariaut, R. (2018). Electrocardiography of the dog and cat: diagnosis of arrhythmias (2nd ed.). Edra.
Silveira, S. D., Gheller, B. G., & Meirelles, A. C. F. (2018). Preoperative electrocardiographic study of dogs at the veterinary hospital of pontifícia universidade católica do paraná. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 19(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1590/1809-6891v19e-49000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v19e-49000
Wolf, R., Camacho, A. A., & Souza, R. C. A. (2000). Eletrocardiografia computadorizada em cães. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 52(6), 1-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352000000600010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352000000600010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
