The role of Kisspeptin in bovine in vitro embryo production

Authors

  • Mayara Mafra Soares Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Deize de Cássia Antonino Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Mayara Oliveira Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Jairo Melo Júnior Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Luciana Ribeiro Peixoto Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Tatiane Silva Maia Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Kele Amaral Alves Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • José Octávio Jacomini Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Ricarda Maria dos Santos Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Gustavo Guerino Macedo Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p621

Keywords:

Blastocysts, In vitro culture, In vitro maturation, In vitro fertilization, Kiss1, Kiss1r.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Kisspeptin (Kp) on the medium used in different stages of in vitro production of bovine embryo (IVEP), evaluating cleavage (CR) and blastocyst (BR) rates. The study was divided into three experiments that analyzed, respectively, the action of Kp on in vitro maturation (IVM), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and in vitro culture (IVC) of bovine embryos. In experiment 1, the oocytes were matured in IVM medium and distributed into the following treatments: maturation (IVM Control, n = 102), maturation with addition of 10-7 M Kp (Kp 10-7 IVM, n = 90), and hormone-free maturation luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) with the addition of 10-7M Kp (No hormones + Kp 10-7, n = 84), following maturation to normal stages of IVEP. In experiment 2, the oocytes were fertilized in IVF medium, in the following treatments: TALP-FERT without Kp (Control IVF, n = 103) and TALP-FERT with the addition of 10-7M Kp (Kp 10-7 IVF, n = 119), usually following the other steps. Finally, in the third experiment, the oocytes passed through all phases and were divided into IVC in two treatments: SOF medium without Kp (Control IVC, n = 109) and SOF medium with the addition of 10-7M Kp (Kp 10-7, N = 106). The data were analyzed by PROC GLIMMIX of the SAS program. In experiment 1, the means of CR and BR were similar (P > 0.05) between treatments (IVM Control76.47% and 37.25%, Kp 10-7 MIV80% and 33.33%, and No hormones + Kp 10-770.24% and 30.95%, respectively). In experiment 2, the means of CR were similar for the IVF Control and Kp 10-7 IVF groups (P > 0.05), 76.70% and 86.55% respectively. But, the mean of the BR of the group Kp 10-7 IVF was 38.66%, which was higher (P < 0.05) than that of the FIV Control group, which was 31.07%. In the third experiment, the means of CR and BR (P > 0.05) were similar between the IVC Control and Kp 10-7 IVC groups (CR 83.50% and 78.30%, and BR 26.60% and 23.60%, respectively). Although at this concentration of 10-7M during IVC no change in embryo production is seen, Kp presents the same performance as both gonadotrophins in oocyte maturation and modulates the fertilization process, providing more blastocysts. With these findings, it can be seen that Kp presents a regulatory action on bovine reproduction, and can be an excellent tool to maximize IVEP indexes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mayara Mafra Soares, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Deize de Cássia Antonino, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Mayara Oliveira, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Jairo Melo Júnior, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Luciana Ribeiro Peixoto, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Tatiane Silva Maia, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Kele Amaral Alves, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Pesquisadora, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

José Octávio Jacomini, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Prof., FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Ricarda Maria dos Santos, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Profa, FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Gustavo Guerino Macedo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Prof., FAMEV/UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-15

How to Cite

Soares, M. M., Antonino, D. de C., Oliveira, M., Melo Júnior, J., Peixoto, L. R., Maia, T. S., … Macedo, G. G. (2018). The role of Kisspeptin in bovine in vitro embryo production. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 39(2), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p621

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.