Agronomic traits of pinto peanut genotypes in response to variable management strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2025v46n1p23

Keywords:

Arachis pintoi, Belmonte cultivar, Defoliation strategy, Legume.

Abstract

Different defoliation strategies can lead to varying performances in forage legumes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the variations in forage accumulation and nutritional value among four cultivars of Arachis pintoi Krapov. & W. C. Greg. (Alqueire-1, Amarillo, Belmonte, and BRS Mandobi) across two harvest intervals (28 and 35 days) and two harvest heights (5 and 10 cm). The parameters measured included accumulation of forage dry matter (DM), morphological composition, nutritional value, in vitro organic matter digestibility, and mass of invasive plants. The Belmonte cultivar exhibited the highest accumulation of forage DM, averaging 5.9 Mg DM ha-1 season-1 across the various management methods. It also showed the highest average accumulation of leaflet DM compared to the other cultivars, while the Amarillo cultivar had the lowest. Additionally, Belmonte showed higher concentrations of crude protein (277 g kg-1 DM) and higher in vitro organic matter digestibility (717 g kg-1 DM) compared to Alqueire-1 and Amarillo, with intermediate levels of neutral detergent fiber (366 g kg-1 DM) relative to the other cultivars. A harvest height of 5 cm yielded the highest accumulation of forage DM in A. pintoi. Canopies managed at this height also exhibited a greater presence of invasive plants. The management practices adopted did not affect the chemical composition or in vitro organic matter digestibility across the cultivars. Overall, the Belmonte cultivar displays productive and nutritional traits that identify it as the pinto peanut with the most potential for utilization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Marcell Patachi Alonso, Universidade de São Paulo

PhD in Animal Science and Pastures, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Junior Issamu Yasuoka, Universidade de São Paulo

Dr. em Zootecnia e Pastagens, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil.

Fagner Junior Gomes, Universidade de São Paulo

Postdoctoral Researcher, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Tatiane Beloni Alonso, Universidade de São Paulo

PhD in Animal Science and Pastures, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Liliane Severino da Silva, Clemson University

Profa., Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, Clemson University, Blackville, South Carolina, United States of America.

Sônia Maria De Stefano Piedade, Universidade de São Paulo

Profa., Department of Exact Sciences, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Carlos Guilherme Silveira Pedreira, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Department of Animal Science, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

References

Andrade, C. M. S., Assis, G. M. L., Gonçalvez, R. G., Ferreira, A. S., & Oliveira, Y. M. F. (2021). Competitive and spreading abilities of forage peanut in tropical mixed pastures. Grass and Forage Science, 76(4), 494-507. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12548

Ankom Technology (2024). Neutral detergent fiber in feeds filter bag technique (for A2000 and A2000I). https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_6_NDF_A200.pdf

Assis, G. M. L., Valentim, J. F., Carneiro, J. M., Jr., Azevedo, J. M. A., & Ferreira, A. S. (2008). Seleção de genótipos de amendoim forrageiro para cobertura do solo e produção de biomassa aérea no período de estabelecimento utilizando-se metodologia de modelos mistos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(11), 1905-1911. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982008001100001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001100001

Cervellini, A., Salati, E., Ferraz, E. S. B., Villa Nova, N. A., Reichardt, K., & Decico, A. (Eds.) (1973). Análise dos dados meteorológicos de Piracicaba (SP) de 1971 a 1970. (Boletim Técnico, 36). ESALQ/USP.

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2006). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos (2a ed.). EMBRAPA.

Fernandes, F. D., Carvalho, M. A., Andrade, R. P. de, Karia, C. T., Ramos, A. K. B., Gomes, A. C., & Souza, M. A. (Eds.) (2003). Avaliação agronômica de acessos de Arachis spp. em Planaltina: DF. EMBRAPA (Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 108). Cerrados.

Gallaher, R. N., Weldon, C. O., & Futral, J. G. (1975). An aluminum block digester for plant and soil analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 39(4), 803-806. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1975.036159950039000400 52x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900040052x

Hambleton, L. G. (1977). Semiautomated method for simultaneous determination of phosphorus, calcium and crude protein in aminal feeds. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 60(4), 845-852. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/60.4.845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/60.4.845

Littel, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (Eds.) (2006). SAS for Mixed Models 2. SAS Institute.

Liz, D. M., Ribeiro, H. M. N., F°., Andrade, E. A., Nardi, C. Z., Miguel, M. F., & Almeida, E. X. (2014). Herbage intake and animal performance of cattle grazing dwarf elaphant grass with two access times to a forage peanut area. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38(6), 607-614. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542014000600010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000600010

Moore, J. E., & Mott, G. O. (1974). Recovery of residual organic matter fom in vivo digestion of forages. Journal of Dairy Science, 57(10), 1258-1259. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(74)85048-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(74)85048-4

Nascimento, I. S., Monks, P. L., Vahl, L. C., Coelho, R. W., Silva, J. B., & Fischer, V. (2010). Adubação PK e manejo de corte sobre a produção de biomassa de amendoim forrageiro. Revista Brasileira Agrociência, 16(1-4), 41-50

Parsons, A. J., & Penning, P. D. (1988). The effect of the duration of regrowth on photosynthesis, leaf death and the average rate of growth in a rotationally grazed sward. Grass and Forage Science, 43(1), 15-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1988.tb02137.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1988.tb02137.x

Pereira, L. E. T., Paiva, A. J., Geremia, E. V., & Silva, S. C. (2013). Regrowth patterns of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) subjected to strategies of intermittent stocking management. Grass and Forage Science, 70(1), 195-204. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12103

Perez, N. B. (2004). Amendoim forrageiro: leguminosa perene de verão. Cultivar Alqueire-1 (BRA 037036). Impressul. (Boletim Técnico).

Pizarro, E. A., & Rincón, A. (1994). Regional experience with forage Arachis in South America. In P. C. Kerridge, & B. Hardy (Orgs.), Biology and agronomy of forage Arachis (Cap. 13, pp. 144-157). Cali.

Prine, G. M., Dunavin, L. S., Glennon, R. J., & Roush, R. D. (Eds.) (1986). Arbrook rhizoma peanut, a perennial forage legume Circular S-332. University of Florida.

Prine, G. M., Dunavin, L. S., Moore, J. E., & Roush, R. D. (Eds.) (1981). “Florigraze” rhizoma peanut: a perennial forage legume Circular S 275. University of Florida.

Ramos, A. K. B., Barcellos, A. O., & Fernandes, F. D. (2010). Gênero Arachis. In D. M. Fonseca, & J. A. Martuscello (Orgs.). Plantas forrageiras (Cap. 8, pp. 249-293). Viçosa.

Santos, E. D. G., Paulino, M. F., Queiroz, D. S., Valadares, S. C., F°., Fonseca, D. M., & Lana, R. P. (2004). Avaliação de pastagem diferida de Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. 1. Características químico-bromatológicas da forragem durante a seca. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33(1), 203-213. doi: 10. 1590/S1516-35982004000100024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000100024

Severino, F. J., & Christoffoleti, P. J. (2001). Efeitos de quantidades de fitomassa de adubos verdes na supressão de plantas daninhas. Planta Daninha, 19(2), 223-228. doi: 10.1590/S0100-835820010002000 10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582001000200010

Silva, D. J., & Queiroz, A. C (2002). Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos (2a ed.). Editora UFV.

Silva, G. P., Fialho, C. A., Carvalho, L. R., Fonseca, L., Carvalho, P. C. F., Bremm, C., & Silva, S. C. (2018). Sward structure and shortterm herbage intake in Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte subjected to varying intensities of grazing. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 156(1), 92-99. doi: 10.1017/S00218 5961700 0855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000855

Silva, S. C., Sbrissia, A. F., & Pereira, L. E. T. (2015). Ecophysiology of C4 forage grasses - understanding plant growth for optimising their use and management. Agriculture, 5(3), 598-625. doi: 10.3390/ agriculture5030598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030598

Simeão, R. M., Assis, G. M. L., Montagner, D. B., & Ferreira, R. C. U. (2016). Forage peanut (Arachis spp.) genetic evaluation and selection. Grass Forage Science, 72(2), 322-332. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12242

Stobbs, T. H. (1973). The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. I. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 24(6), 809-819. doi: 10.1071/AR9730809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9730809

Teasdale, J. R. (1998). Cover crops, smother plants, and weed management. In J. L. Hatfield (Org.), Integrated weed and soil management (pp. 247-270). Chelsea.

Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science, 18(2), 104-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Valadares, S. C. Fº., Machado, P. A. S., Furtado, T., Chizzotti, M. L., & Amaral, H. F. (Eds.) (2015). Tabelas brasileiras de composição de alimentos para ruminantes. Editora Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Valls, J. F. M., & Simpson, C. E. (1994). Taxonomy, natural distribution and atributtes of Arachis. In P. C. Kerridge, & B. Hardy (Orgs.), Biology and agronomy of forage arachis (pp. 1-18). Cali.

Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501732355

Wolfinger, R., & O’Connell, M. (1993). Generalized linear mixed models - a pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 48(3-4), 233-243. doi: 10.1080/00949659308811554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659308811554

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Alonso, M. P., Yasuoka, J. I., Gomes, F. J., Alonso, T. B., Silva, L. S. da, Piedade, S. M. D. S., & Pedreira, C. G. S. (2024). Agronomic traits of pinto peanut genotypes in response to variable management strategies. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 46(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2025v46n1p23

Issue

Section

Articles