Evaluation of platelet count by automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread® compared with blood smear estimative and count by hemocytometer

Authors

  • Augusto Schweirgert Universidade Estadual Paulista- "Julio de Mesquita Filho"- Campus Araçatuba
  • Fábio Hosoi Rezende Médico veterinário autônomo de São Paulo
  • Denise Tabacchi Fantoni Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Ludmila Rodrigues Moroz Universidade Metropolitana de Santos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001

Keywords:

Count of platelets, Canine, Hemocytometer, Blood smear estimative, QBC Vet Autoread®

Abstract

The platelet blood count in laboratorial routine provides to the clinician important information about the hemostasis of the patient. There are many techniques described, however the gold standard techniques realized in hemocytometer spent a lot of time, making this technique impracticable in great routines. This research had the intent to evaluate if the automatic veterinary blood counter QBC Vet Autoread®, whose results get five minutes to be ready, is capable to offer a trustworthy platelet count number. To this end, were evaluated the correlations among three different forms of platelets count in dogs: count in automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread®, estimative in blood smear and the gold standard method by manual count in hemocytometer. The viability and confidence use of automatic blood counters of the medicine veterinary routine. Seventeen dogs were chosen randomly way, in the medical and surgical routine of HOVET-USP. The analysis revel high correlation between the hemocytometer and the estimative in blood smear (r=0,875) and between the hemocytometer and automatic blood count by QBC Vet Autoread® (r=0,939). Conclude that the platelet blood cont by QBC Vet Autoread®, in addition to be fast, it’s more truthful when compared with estimative in blood smear, although the latter one also had elevated correlation. However, morphological analysis through the smears cannot be dismissed because none of the other two techniques evaluated have the ability to assess platelet morphological changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Augusto Schweirgert, Universidade Estadual Paulista- "Julio de Mesquita Filho"- Campus Araçatuba

Médico veterinário formado pela Faculdade Integrado de Campo Mourão, Residencia Anatomia Patológica pela Universidade do Oeste Paulista-UNOESTE. Mestrando em Ciência Animal pela UNESP/FO - Araçatuba.

Fábio Hosoi Rezende, Médico veterinário autônomo de São Paulo

Médico veterinário autônomo formado pela Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo.

Denise Tabacchi Fantoni, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo

Professora Associada do Departamento de Cirurgia (VCI) da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo, responsável pelo setor de Anestesia do HOVET-USP.

Ludmila Rodrigues Moroz, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos

Médica Veterinária formada pela Universidade Estadual de Londrina, onde foi residente em Patologia Animal, Mestre pela Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo. Docente da Universidade Metropolitana de Santos.

Published

2010-12-20

How to Cite

Schweirgert, A., Rezende, F. H., Fantoni, D. T., & Moroz, L. R. (2010). Evaluation of platelet count by automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread® compared with blood smear estimative and count by hemocytometer. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 31(4), 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.