A relação entre ideologia e protesto sob uma perspectiva comparada

Daniel Leonel da Rocha; Ednaldo Aparecido  Ribeiro

doi:10.5433/2176-6665.2025v30e52193

Autores

Daniel Leonel da Rocha Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia, Representação e Legitimidade (INCT) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-1497
Ednaldo Aparecido Ribeiro Universidade Estadual de Maringá https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-5108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2025v30e52193

Palavras-chave:

protesto, ideologia, polarização, governo, disposições atitudinais

Resumo

Este estudo investiga a relação entre ideologia e protesto, questionando a perspectiva de assimetria que destaca o protagonismo da esquerda. Argumentamos que as tendências de protestos variam conforme fatores contextuais. Testamos duas hipóteses: (H1) a disponibilidade atitudinal modera a relação entre ideologia extrema e engajamento em protestos; (H2) a polarização política e a orientação do governo influenciam a mobilização ideológica. Para testar essas hipóteses, analisamos os dados da última onda do World Values Survey (WVS 7), utilizando modelos logísticos hierárquicos. Os resultados indicam que a polarização cultural afeta a mobilização da esquerda, enquanto a polarização política impacta a direita, confirmando parcialmente as hipóteses.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Daniel Leonel da Rocha, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia, Representação e Legitimidade (INCT)

Doutor em Ciências Sociais pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (2024). Pós-doutorando junto ao Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia – Representação e Legitimidade Democrática (INCT-ReDem). Pesquisa financiada pelo CNPq (Processo Nº 406649/2022-7. E-mail: daniel.leonel.rocha@gmail.com.

Ednaldo Aparecido Ribeiro, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Doutor em Sociologia pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (2008). Docente junto ao Departamento de Ciências Sociais e ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Pesquisa financiada pelo CNPq (Processo Nº 406649/2022-7). E-mail: ednaldoribeiro@icloud.com.

Referências

ALMEIDA, Paul. Movimientos sociales: la estructura de la acción colectiva. Tradução de Lilia Mosconi. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm010t.

BEYERLEIN, Kraig; HIPP, John R. From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, Knoxville, Tennessee, v. 53, n. 1, p. 97-117, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.97

BORBA, Julian; RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; FUKS, Mario. Polarization and ideology: exploring the contextual nature of democratic commitment. Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 32, p. e006, 2024.

BRADY, Henry E.; SNIDERMAN, Paul M. Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1061-1078, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1956248

BRANDT, Mark J.; SLEEGERS, Willem W. A. Evaluating belief system networks as a theory of political belief system dynamics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 25, n. 2, p. 159-185, 2021. DOI:

CONVERSE, Philip E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, London, v. 18, n. 1-3, p. 1-74, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650

DALTON, Russell J. Social modernization and the end of ideology debate: Patterns of ideological polarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science, London, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109905002045

DALTON, Russell J.; ROHRSCHNEIDER, Robert. Political action and the political context: a multi-level model of environmental activism. In: FUCHS, Dieter; ROLLER, Edeltraud; WEßELS, Bernhard (ed.). Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West: Studien zur politischen Kultur und zum politischen Prozess. Festschrift für Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002. p. 333-350.

DALTON, Russell; VAN SICKLE, Alix; WELDON, Steven. The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, v. 40, n. 1, p. 51-73, 2010.

DOWNEY, Gary L. Ideology and the clamshell identity: Organizational dilemmas in the anti-nuclear power movement. Social Problems, Knoxville, Tennessee, v. 33, n. 5, p. 357-373, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.5.03a00020

DUCKITT, John; BIZUMIC, Boris. Multidimensionality of right‐wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism. Political Psychology, Cambridge, v. 34, n. 6, p. 841-862, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022

EISINGER, Peter K. The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 67, n. 1, p. 11-28, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1958525

ELLIS, Christopher; STIMSON, James A. Ideology in america. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

FEDERICO, Christopher; MALKA, Ariel. Ideology: The psychological and social foundations of belief systems. PsyArXiv Preprints, p. 1-86, 2021. Preprint. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xhvyj

FELDMAN, Stanley; CONOVER, Pamela Johnston. Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. The Journal of Politics, Austin, v. 45, n. 4, p. 810-839, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2130414

FELDMAN, Stanley; JOHNSTON, Christopher D. Understanding political ideology: The necessity of a multi-dimensional conceptualization. In: APSA 2009. Toronto: American Political Science Association, 2009. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451328#paper-citations-widget

GALAIS, Carol; LORENZINI, Jasmine. Half a loaf is (not) better than none: How austerity-related grievances and emotions triggered protests in Spain. Mobilization, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 77-95, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-77

GARSON, G. David. Fundamentals of hierarchical linear and multilevel modeling. In: GARSON, G. David (ed.). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. London: Sage, 2013. p. 3-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450.n1

GELMAN, Andrew. Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: What it can and cannot do. Technometrics, Richmond, v. 48, n. 3, p. 432-435, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/004017005000000661

GRAHAM, Matthew H.; SVOLIK, Milan W. Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 114, n. 2, p. 392-409, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052

GRASSO, Maria T.; GIUGNI, Marco. Protest participation and economic crisis: The conditioning role of political opportunities. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 55, n. 4, p. 663-680, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12153

GUTTING, Raynee Sarah. Contentious activities, disrespectful protesters: Effect of protest context on protest support and mobilization across ideology and authoritarianism. Political Behavior, New York, v. 42, n. 3, p. 865-890, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09523-8

HERRE, Bastian. Identifying ideologues: A global dataset on political leaders, 1945–2020. British Journal of Political Science, London, v. 53, n. 2, p. 740-748, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000217

HUNTER, James Davison A guerra cultural contínua. Políticas Culturais em Revista, Olinda, v. 15, n. 1, p. 22-62, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/pcr.v15i1.48385

INGLEHART, R.; WELZEL, C.; Modernização, mudança cultural e democracia: a sequência do desenvolvimento humano. São Paulo, Francis, 2009.

JOST, John T.; FEDERICO, Christopher M.; NAPIER, Jaime L. Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In: FREEDEN, Michael; STEARS, Marc (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 232-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0024

KELLY, Caroline; BREINLINGER, Sara. The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London & New York: Routledge, 1996.

KLANDERMANS, Bert. Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 49, n. 5, p. 583-600, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417

KLANDERMANS, Bert. The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In: MORRIS, Aldon D.; MUELLER, Carol McClurg (ed.). Frontiers in social movement theory. Yale: Yale University Press, 1992. p. 77-103.

KLANDERMANS, Bert; ROEFS, Marlene; OLIVIER, Johan. Grievance formation in a country in transition: South Africa, 1994-1998. Social Psychology Quarterly, Albany, v. 64, n. 1, p. 41-54, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3090149

KLEINER, Tuuli-Marja. Does ideological polarisation mobilise citizens?. European Political Science, v. 19, n. 4, p. 573-602, 2020.

KLEINER, Tuuli‐Marja. Public opinion polarisation and protest behaviour. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 57, n. 4, p. 941-962, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12260

KOSTELKA, Filip; ROVNY, Jan. It’s not the left: Ideology and protest participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, Beverly Hills, v. 52, n. 11, p. 1677-1712, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830717

KROH, Martin. Measuring left–right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, New York, v. 71, n. 2, p. 204-220, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm009

KURER, Thomas; HÄUSERMANN, Silja; WÜEST, Bruno; ENGGIST, Matthias. Economic grievances and political protest. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 58, n. 3, p. 866-892, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12318

LAFFERTY, William M.; KNUTSEN, Oddbjørn. Leftist and rightist ideology in a social democratic state: An analysis of Norway in the midst of the conservative resurgence. British Journal of Political Science, London, v. 14, n. 3, p. 345-367, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003641

MALKA, A.; SOTO, C. J.; INZLICHT, M.; LELKES, Y. Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031, 2014.

MCADAM, Doug. Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 92, n. 1, p. 64-90, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228463

MELUCCI, Alberto. Getting involved: Identity and mobilization in social movements. In: KLANDERMANS, Bert; HANSPETER, Kriesi; TARROW, Sidney (ed.). International social movement research. London: JAI Press, 1988. p. 329-339. Disponível em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/130155005/Melucci-Alberto-Getting-Involved-Identity-and-Mobilization-in-Social-Movements

MONDAK, Jeffery J.; CANACHE, Damarys. Personality and political culture in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, v. 67, n. 1, p. 26-41, 2014.

OPP, Karl-Dieter. Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. London: Routledge, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883846

PEREIRA, Frederico Batista. Sofisticação política e opinião pública no Brasil: revisitando hipóteses clássicas. Opinião Pública, Campinas, v. 19, p. 291-319, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762013000200003

POLLETTA, Francesca; JASPER, James M. Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, Palo Alto, v. 27, n. 1, p. 283-305, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283

RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; BORBA, Julian. Participação política, extremismo ideológico e dogmatismo. Teoria & Pesquisa, v. 29, n. 2, 2020.

RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; BORBA, Julian; FUKS, Mario. Tolerância política e ativismo de protesto no Brasil: efeitos comportamentais do apoio a direitos políticos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 38, p. e255478, 2022.

SCHUSSMAN, Alan; SOULE, Sarah A. Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, Chapel Hill, v. 84, n. 2, p. 1083-1108, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0034

SNOW, David A; BENFORD, Robert D. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, [Cham], v. 1, p. 197-217, 1988. Disponível em: https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~oliver/SOC924/Articles/SnowBenfordIdeologyframeresonanceandparticipantmobilization.pdf

STENNER, Karen. Three kinds of “conservatism”. Psychological Inquiry, Mahwah, v. 20, n. 2/3, p. 142-159, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028615

STENNER, Paul. Rights and emotions or: The importance of having the right emotions. History & Philosophy of Psychology, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2005.

STÜRMER, Stefan; SIMON, Bernd. The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Thousand Oaks, v. 30, n. 3, p. 263-277, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690

SVOLIK, Milan W. Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy, Baltimore, v. 30, n. 3, p. 20-32, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0039

TARROW, Sidney. O poder em movimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009.

VAN DER MEER, Tom W. G.; VAN DETH, Jan W.; SCHEEPERS, Peer L. H. The politicized participant: Ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies, Leicester, v. 42, n. 11, p. 1426-1457, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332136

WHITFORD, Andrew B.; YATES, Jeff; OCHS, Holona L. Ideological extremism and public participation. Social Science Quarterly, Austin, v. 87, n. 1, p. 36-54, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2006.00367.x