A relação entre ideologia e protesto sob uma perspectiva comparada

Daniel Leonel da Rocha; Ednaldo Aparecido  Ribeiro

doi:10.5433/2176-6665.2025v30e52193

Autores/as

Daniel Leonel da Rocha Instituto Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Representación y Legitimidad Democrática (INCT) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-1497
Ednaldo Aparecido Ribeiro Universidad Estatal de Maringá´ (UEM) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-5108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2025v30e52193

Palabras clave:

protesta, ideología, polarización, gobierno, disposiciones actitudinales

Resumen

Este estudio investiga la relación entre ideología y protesta, cuestionando la perspectiva de asimetría que destaca el protagonismo de la izquierda. Argumentamos que las tendencias de protesta varían según factores contextuales. Probamos dos hipótesis: (H1) la disponibilidad actitudinal modera la relación entre ideología extrema y participación en protestas; (H2) la polarización política y la orientación del gobierno influyen en la movilización ideológica. Para poner a prueba estas hipótesis, analizamos los datos de la última ola del World Values Survey (WVS 7), utilizando modelos logísticos jerárquicos. Los resultados indican que la polarización cultural afecta la movilización de la izquierda, mientras que la polarización política impacta a la derecha, confirmando parcialmente las hipótesis.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Daniel Leonel da Rocha, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Representación y Legitimidad Democrática (INCT)

Doctor en Ciencias Sociales por la Universidad Federal Rural de Río de Janeiro (2024). Investigador posdoctoral en el Instituto Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología – Representación y Legitimidad Democrática (INCT-ReDem). Investigación financiada por el CNPq (Proceso Nº 406649/2022-7). Correo electrónico: daniel.leonel.rocha@gmail.com.

Ednaldo Aparecido Ribeiro, Universidad Estatal de Maringá´ (UEM)

Doctor en Sociología por la Universidad Federal de Paraná (2008). Profesor en el Departamento de Ciencias Sociales y en el Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Estatal de Maringá. Investigación financiada por el CNPq (Proceso Nº 406649/2022-7). Correo electrónico: ednaldoribeiro@icloud.com.

Citas

ALMEIDA, Paul. Movimientos sociales: la estructura de la acción colectiva. Tradução de Lilia Mosconi. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm010t.

BEYERLEIN, Kraig; HIPP, John R. From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, Knoxville, Tennessee, v. 53, n. 1, p. 97-117, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.97

BORBA, Julian; RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; FUKS, Mario. Polarization and ideology: exploring the contextual nature of democratic commitment. Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 32, p. e006, 2024.

BRADY, Henry E.; SNIDERMAN, Paul M. Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1061-1078, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1956248

BRANDT, Mark J.; SLEEGERS, Willem W. A. Evaluating belief system networks as a theory of political belief system dynamics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 25, n. 2, p. 159-185, 2021. DOI:

CONVERSE, Philip E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, London, v. 18, n. 1-3, p. 1-74, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650

DALTON, Russell J. Social modernization and the end of ideology debate: Patterns of ideological polarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science, London, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109905002045

DALTON, Russell J.; ROHRSCHNEIDER, Robert. Political action and the political context: a multi-level model of environmental activism. In: FUCHS, Dieter; ROLLER, Edeltraud; WEßELS, Bernhard (ed.). Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West: Studien zur politischen Kultur und zum politischen Prozess. Festschrift für Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002. p. 333-350.

DALTON, Russell; VAN SICKLE, Alix; WELDON, Steven. The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, v. 40, n. 1, p. 51-73, 2010.

DOWNEY, Gary L. Ideology and the clamshell identity: Organizational dilemmas in the anti-nuclear power movement. Social Problems, Knoxville, Tennessee, v. 33, n. 5, p. 357-373, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.5.03a00020

DUCKITT, John; BIZUMIC, Boris. Multidimensionality of right‐wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism. Political Psychology, Cambridge, v. 34, n. 6, p. 841-862, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022

EISINGER, Peter K. The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 67, n. 1, p. 11-28, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1958525

ELLIS, Christopher; STIMSON, James A. Ideology in america. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

FEDERICO, Christopher; MALKA, Ariel. Ideology: The psychological and social foundations of belief systems. PsyArXiv Preprints, p. 1-86, 2021. Preprint. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xhvyj

FELDMAN, Stanley; CONOVER, Pamela Johnston. Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. The Journal of Politics, Austin, v. 45, n. 4, p. 810-839, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2130414

FELDMAN, Stanley; JOHNSTON, Christopher D. Understanding political ideology: The necessity of a multi-dimensional conceptualization. In: APSA 2009. Toronto: American Political Science Association, 2009. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451328#paper-citations-widget

GALAIS, Carol; LORENZINI, Jasmine. Half a loaf is (not) better than none: How austerity-related grievances and emotions triggered protests in Spain. Mobilization, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 77-95, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-77

GARSON, G. David. Fundamentals of hierarchical linear and multilevel modeling. In: GARSON, G. David (ed.). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. London: Sage, 2013. p. 3-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450.n1

GELMAN, Andrew. Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: What it can and cannot do. Technometrics, Richmond, v. 48, n. 3, p. 432-435, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/004017005000000661

GRAHAM, Matthew H.; SVOLIK, Milan W. Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, Washington, v. 114, n. 2, p. 392-409, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052

GRASSO, Maria T.; GIUGNI, Marco. Protest participation and economic crisis: The conditioning role of political opportunities. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 55, n. 4, p. 663-680, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12153

GUTTING, Raynee Sarah. Contentious activities, disrespectful protesters: Effect of protest context on protest support and mobilization across ideology and authoritarianism. Political Behavior, New York, v. 42, n. 3, p. 865-890, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09523-8

HERRE, Bastian. Identifying ideologues: A global dataset on political leaders, 1945–2020. British Journal of Political Science, London, v. 53, n. 2, p. 740-748, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000217

HUNTER, James Davison A guerra cultural contínua. Políticas Culturais em Revista, Olinda, v. 15, n. 1, p. 22-62, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/pcr.v15i1.48385

INGLEHART, R.; WELZEL, C.; Modernização, mudança cultural e democracia: a sequência do desenvolvimento humano. São Paulo, Francis, 2009.

JOST, John T.; FEDERICO, Christopher M.; NAPIER, Jaime L. Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In: FREEDEN, Michael; STEARS, Marc (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 232-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0024

KELLY, Caroline; BREINLINGER, Sara. The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London & New York: Routledge, 1996.

KLANDERMANS, Bert. Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 49, n. 5, p. 583-600, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417

KLANDERMANS, Bert. The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In: MORRIS, Aldon D.; MUELLER, Carol McClurg (ed.). Frontiers in social movement theory. Yale: Yale University Press, 1992. p. 77-103.

KLANDERMANS, Bert; ROEFS, Marlene; OLIVIER, Johan. Grievance formation in a country in transition: South Africa, 1994-1998. Social Psychology Quarterly, Albany, v. 64, n. 1, p. 41-54, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3090149

KLEINER, Tuuli-Marja. Does ideological polarisation mobilise citizens?. European Political Science, v. 19, n. 4, p. 573-602, 2020.

KLEINER, Tuuli‐Marja. Public opinion polarisation and protest behaviour. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 57, n. 4, p. 941-962, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12260

KOSTELKA, Filip; ROVNY, Jan. It’s not the left: Ideology and protest participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, Beverly Hills, v. 52, n. 11, p. 1677-1712, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830717

KROH, Martin. Measuring left–right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, New York, v. 71, n. 2, p. 204-220, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm009

KURER, Thomas; HÄUSERMANN, Silja; WÜEST, Bruno; ENGGIST, Matthias. Economic grievances and political protest. European Journal of Political Research, Dordrecht, v. 58, n. 3, p. 866-892, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12318

LAFFERTY, William M.; KNUTSEN, Oddbjørn. Leftist and rightist ideology in a social democratic state: An analysis of Norway in the midst of the conservative resurgence. British Journal of Political Science, London, v. 14, n. 3, p. 345-367, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003641

MALKA, A.; SOTO, C. J.; INZLICHT, M.; LELKES, Y. Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031, 2014.

MCADAM, Doug. Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 92, n. 1, p. 64-90, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228463

MELUCCI, Alberto. Getting involved: Identity and mobilization in social movements. In: KLANDERMANS, Bert; HANSPETER, Kriesi; TARROW, Sidney (ed.). International social movement research. London: JAI Press, 1988. p. 329-339. Disponível em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/130155005/Melucci-Alberto-Getting-Involved-Identity-and-Mobilization-in-Social-Movements

MONDAK, Jeffery J.; CANACHE, Damarys. Personality and political culture in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, v. 67, n. 1, p. 26-41, 2014.

OPP, Karl-Dieter. Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. London: Routledge, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883846

PEREIRA, Frederico Batista. Sofisticação política e opinião pública no Brasil: revisitando hipóteses clássicas. Opinião Pública, Campinas, v. 19, p. 291-319, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762013000200003

POLLETTA, Francesca; JASPER, James M. Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, Palo Alto, v. 27, n. 1, p. 283-305, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283

RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; BORBA, Julian. Participação política, extremismo ideológico e dogmatismo. Teoria & Pesquisa, v. 29, n. 2, 2020.

RIBEIRO, Ednaldo; BORBA, Julian; FUKS, Mario. Tolerância política e ativismo de protesto no Brasil: efeitos comportamentais do apoio a direitos políticos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 38, p. e255478, 2022.

SCHUSSMAN, Alan; SOULE, Sarah A. Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, Chapel Hill, v. 84, n. 2, p. 1083-1108, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0034

SNOW, David A; BENFORD, Robert D. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, [Cham], v. 1, p. 197-217, 1988. Disponível em: https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~oliver/SOC924/Articles/SnowBenfordIdeologyframeresonanceandparticipantmobilization.pdf

STENNER, Karen. Three kinds of “conservatism”. Psychological Inquiry, Mahwah, v. 20, n. 2/3, p. 142-159, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028615

STENNER, Paul. Rights and emotions or: The importance of having the right emotions. History & Philosophy of Psychology, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2005.

STÜRMER, Stefan; SIMON, Bernd. The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Thousand Oaks, v. 30, n. 3, p. 263-277, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690

SVOLIK, Milan W. Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy, Baltimore, v. 30, n. 3, p. 20-32, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0039

TARROW, Sidney. O poder em movimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009.

VAN DER MEER, Tom W. G.; VAN DETH, Jan W.; SCHEEPERS, Peer L. H. The politicized participant: Ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies, Leicester, v. 42, n. 11, p. 1426-1457, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332136

WHITFORD, Andrew B.; YATES, Jeff; OCHS, Holona L. Ideological extremism and public participation. Social Science Quarterly, Austin, v. 87, n. 1, p. 36-54, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2006.00367.x