Do problema do essencialismo a outra maneira de se fazer política: retomando o potencial transformador das políticas de diferença
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2010v15n2p166Palabras clave:
Políticas de diferença, Essencialismo, Desigualdades de gênero, Iris Marion Young, Anne PhillipsResumen
Este artigo visa retomar e fazer uma avaliação crítica do debate sobre as políticas de diferença travado entre teóricas políticas feministas de tradição liberal. Após explicitar as estratégias apontadas nesse debate para tentar legitimar a politização de sujeitos coletivos em face do problema do essencialismo, argumenta-se que o excessivo foco na relação entre essencialismo e conceitualização de grupos sociais ofuscou o vínculo do projeto de politização de diferenças com o questionamento do próprio fazer político. Assim, sob a perspectiva de que a politização de diferenças está transformando - e não inviabilizando - o funcionamento da comunidade política e a possibilidade de efetiva justiça social, avalia-se como os projetos políticos de Anne Phillips e Iris Marion Young evidenciam novos caminhos para reconfigurar a esfera política de uma maneira transformadora das desigualdades estruturais.Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
BARRETT, Michèle; PHILLIPS, Anne (org.). Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: Polity, 1992.
BARRY, Brian. Second thoughts: and some first thoughts revived. In: KELLY, Paul (org.). Multiculturalism reconsidered. Cambridge: Polity, 2002. p. 204-38.
BENHABIB, Seyla. The liberal imagination and the four dogmas of multiculturalism. The Yale Journal of Criticism, Baltimore, v. 12, n. 2, p. 401-413, 1999.
BENHABIB, Seyla. (org.). The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
FUSS, Diana. Essentially speaking: feminism, nature and difference. London: Routledge, 1989.
GOLDFINGER, Johnny; JAMES, Michael R. Rethinking social group perspective. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, 2005, Washington.
KYMLICKA, Will. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
LLOYD, Moya. Beyond identity politics: feminism, power & politics. London: Sage, 2005.
MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. Perspectivas sociais e dominação simbólica: a presença política das mulheres entre Iris Marion Young e Pierre Bordieu. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, v. 18, n. 36, p. 25-49, 2010.
MOI, Toril. What is a woman? and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
PHILLIPS, Anne. Universal pretentions in political thought. In: BARRETT, Michèle; PHILLIPS, Anne (org.). Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: Polity, 1992. p. 10-30.
PHILLIPS, Michèle Anne. Democracy and difference. Cambridge: Polity, 1993.
PHILLIPS, Michèle Anne. The politics of presence: the political representation of gender, ethnicity and race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
TAYLOR, Charles. The politics of recognition. In: GUTMANN, A. (org.). Multiculturalism and 'the politics of recognition'. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992. p. 25-73.
WELDON, S. Laurel. Difference and social structure: Iris Young's critical social theory of gender. Constellations, Oxford, v. 14, n. 2, p. 280-88, 2007.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, Washington, v. 99, n. 2, p. 250-274, 1989.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Gender as seriality: thinking about women as social collective. Signs, New Brunswick, v. 19, n. 3, p. 713-738, 1994.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: BENHABIB, Seyla (org.). Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. p. 120-35.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Ruling norms and the politics of difference: a comment on Seyla Benhabib. The Yale Journal of Criticism, Baltimore, v. 12, n. 2, p. 415-421, 1999.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
BARRY, Brian. Second thoughts: and some first thoughts revived. In: KELLY, Paul (org.). Multiculturalism reconsidered. Cambridge: Polity, 2002. p. 204-38.
BENHABIB, Seyla. The liberal imagination and the four dogmas of multiculturalism. The Yale Journal of Criticism, Baltimore, v. 12, n. 2, p. 401-413, 1999.
BENHABIB, Seyla. (org.). The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
FUSS, Diana. Essentially speaking: feminism, nature and difference. London: Routledge, 1989.
GOLDFINGER, Johnny; JAMES, Michael R. Rethinking social group perspective. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, 2005, Washington.
KYMLICKA, Will. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
LLOYD, Moya. Beyond identity politics: feminism, power & politics. London: Sage, 2005.
MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. Perspectivas sociais e dominação simbólica: a presença política das mulheres entre Iris Marion Young e Pierre Bordieu. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, v. 18, n. 36, p. 25-49, 2010.
MOI, Toril. What is a woman? and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
PHILLIPS, Anne. Universal pretentions in political thought. In: BARRETT, Michèle; PHILLIPS, Anne (org.). Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: Polity, 1992. p. 10-30.
PHILLIPS, Michèle Anne. Democracy and difference. Cambridge: Polity, 1993.
PHILLIPS, Michèle Anne. The politics of presence: the political representation of gender, ethnicity and race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
TAYLOR, Charles. The politics of recognition. In: GUTMANN, A. (org.). Multiculturalism and 'the politics of recognition'. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992. p. 25-73.
WELDON, S. Laurel. Difference and social structure: Iris Young's critical social theory of gender. Constellations, Oxford, v. 14, n. 2, p. 280-88, 2007.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, Washington, v. 99, n. 2, p. 250-274, 1989.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Gender as seriality: thinking about women as social collective. Signs, New Brunswick, v. 19, n. 3, p. 713-738, 1994.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: BENHABIB, Seyla (org.). Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. p. 120-35.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Ruling norms and the politics of difference: a comment on Seyla Benhabib. The Yale Journal of Criticism, Baltimore, v. 12, n. 2, p. 415-421, 1999.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Descargas
Publicado
2010-12-01
Cómo citar
TOSOLD, Léa. Do problema do essencialismo a outra maneira de se fazer política: retomando o potencial transformador das políticas de diferença. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 15, n. 2, p. 166–183, 2010. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2010v15n2p166. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/8228. Acesso em: 25 ene. 2026.
Número
Sección
Dossier
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2010 Léa Tosold
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Mediations son del autor; En caso de republicación parcial o total de la primera publicación, se solicita a los autores que indiquen la publicación original en la revista.
Mediações utiliza la licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, que proporciona acceso abierto, permitiendo a cualquier usuario leer, descargar, copiar y difundir su contenido, siempre que esté debidamente referenciado.
Las opiniones emitidas por los autores de los artículos son de su exclusiva responsabilidad.
