Estatísticas de citações
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2009v14n1p69Palabras clave:
Avaliação, Fator de impacto, Índice H, Pesquisa científicaResumen
Este artigo é um relatório acerca do emprego e uso de citações na avaliação de pesquisas científicas. A idéia de que a avaliação da pesquisa deve ser feita empregando métodos “simples e objetivos” é cada vez mais prevalecente hoje no mundo acadêmico, o que tem gerado uma “cultura de números”, sustentada no pressuposto de que tais avaliações são mais precisas e buscam superar julgamentos subjetivos da revisão por pares. No entanto, tais considerações são analisadas por profissionais que “lidam com números” – os matemáticos e os estatísticos. A convicção nas estatísticas deixa de ter fundamento quando estas são mal aplicadas ou mal interpretadas, como pode ocorrer no caso de uso de estatística para classificar periódicos, documentos, pessoas, programas e disciplinas. Os autores chamam a atenção para a objetividade ilusória dos números e para o fato de que a avaliação baseada em dados de citações pode fornecer uma visão limitada, superficial e incompleta da qualidade da pesquisa.Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
ADLER, Robert. The impact of impact factors. IMS Bulletin, v. 36, n. 5, p. 4, 2007. Disponível em: http://bulletin.imstat.org/pdf/36/5
AMIN, M.; MABE, M. Impact factor: use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, n. 1, p. 1-6, out. 2000.
BATISTA, Pablo Diniz; CAMPITELI, Monica Guimaraes; KINOUCHI, Osame; MARTINEZ, Alexandre Souto. Universal behavior of a research productivity index. arXiv: physics, v. 1, p. 1-5, 2005. arXiv:physics/0510142v1
BATISTA, Pablo Diniz; CAMPITELI, Monica Guimaraes; KINOUCHI, Osame. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics, v. 68, n. 1, p. 179-189, 2006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4.
BERGSTROM, Carl. Eigenfactor: masuring the value and presitige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, v. 68, n. 5, May 2007.
BEST, Joel. Damned lies and statistics: untangling the numbers from the media, politicians, and activists. University of California Press: Berkeley, 2001.
BIRD, Sheila; et al. Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly; Report of a working party on performance monitoring in the public services. J.R.Statist. Soc. A, 168, Part 1, p. 1-27, 2005.
BROOKS, Terrence. Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 37, n. 1, p. 34-36, 1986.
CAREY, Alan L.; COWLING, Michael G.; TAYLOR, Peter G. Assessing research in the mathematical sciences. Gazette of the Australian Math Society, v. 34, n. 2, p. 84-89, maio 2007.
COZZENS, Susan E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model.
Scientometrics, v. 15, n. 5-6, p. 437-447, 1989.
EGGHE, Leo. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, v. 69, n. 1, p. 131-152, 2006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
EVIDENCE REPORT. The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in the UK higher education system, 2007. [Um relatório produzido para a Research Policy Committee of Universities (Comissão Universitária de Política de Pesquisa), Reino Unido, por Evidence Ltda., uma empresa especializada em análises e interpretação de desempenho de pequisa. Evidence Ltda. tem “aliança estratégica” com a Thomson Scientific.]
EWING, John. Measuring journals. Notices of the AMS, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1049-1053, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ams.org/notices/200609/comm-ewing.pdf
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in
documentation through association of ideas. Science, v. 122, n. 3159, p.108-11, jul. 1955. Disponível em: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/science1955.pdf
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, v. 178, n. 4060, p. 471-479, 1972.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Current Comments, v. 2, p. 3, 12 jan. 1987.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Long-term vs. short-term journal impact (part II). The Scientist, v. 12, n. 14, p. 12-3, 6 jul. 1998.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Agony and the ecstasy – the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON PEER REVIEW AND BIBLIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION, 2005, Chicago. Paper… Chicago, 16 sep. 2005.
GOLDSTEIN, Harvey; SPIEGELHALTER, David J. League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, v. 159, n. 3, p 385-443, 1996.
HALL, Peter. Measuring research performance in the mathematical sciences in Australian universities. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, v. 34, n. 1, p. 26-30, 2007.
HIRSCH, J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, v. 102, n. 46, p. 16569-16573, 2006.
KINNEY, A. L. National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, v. 104, n. 46, p. 17943-17947, nov. 2007.
LEHMANN, Sune; JACKSON, Andrew D.; LAUTRUP, Benny E. Measures for measures, Nature, v. 444, n. 21, p. 1003-1004, 2006.
MACDONALD, Stuart; KAM, Jacqueline. Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Information Science, v. 33, p. 702-717, 2007.
MARTIN, Ben R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research, Scientometrics, v. 36, n. 3, p. 343-362, 1996. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599
MARTIN, Ben R.; IRVINE, John. Assessing basic research. Research Policy, v. 12, p. 61-90, 1983. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7.
MEHO, Lokman; YANG, Kiduk. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 13, p. 2105-2125, 2007. Disponivel em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677.
MOLINARI, J. F., MOLINARI, A. A new methodology for ranking scientific nstitutions. To appear in Scientometrics, 2008. Disponível em: http://imechanica.org/files/paper.pdf
MONASTERSKY, R. The number that’s devouring science. Chronicle Higher Ed., v. 52, n. 8, 2005. Disponível em: http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm
ROSSNER, Mike; VAN EPPS, Heather; HILL, Emma. Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, v. 179, n. 6, p. 1091-1092, 17 dez. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
SEGLEN, P. O. Why the impact factor for journals should not be used for evaluating research; BMJ, v. 314, n. 497, 15 fev. 1997. Disponível em: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497.
SIDIROPOULOS, Antonis; KATSAROS, Dimitrios; MANOLOPOULOS, Yannis. Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks, v. 72, n. 2, p. 253-280, aug. 2007.
STRINGER, M. J.; SALES-PARDO, M.; NUNES AMARAL, L. A. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE, v. 3, n. 2, 2008. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001683
THOMSON: JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS. 2007. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jcr/
THOMSON: SELECTION. 2007. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/
THOMSON: IMPACT FACTOR. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor/
THOMSON: HISTORY. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/citationindexing/history/
THOMSON: FIFTY YEARS. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/citationindexing/50y-citationindexing.
AMIN, M.; MABE, M. Impact factor: use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, n. 1, p. 1-6, out. 2000.
BATISTA, Pablo Diniz; CAMPITELI, Monica Guimaraes; KINOUCHI, Osame; MARTINEZ, Alexandre Souto. Universal behavior of a research productivity index. arXiv: physics, v. 1, p. 1-5, 2005. arXiv:physics/0510142v1
BATISTA, Pablo Diniz; CAMPITELI, Monica Guimaraes; KINOUCHI, Osame. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics, v. 68, n. 1, p. 179-189, 2006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4.
BERGSTROM, Carl. Eigenfactor: masuring the value and presitige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, v. 68, n. 5, May 2007.
BEST, Joel. Damned lies and statistics: untangling the numbers from the media, politicians, and activists. University of California Press: Berkeley, 2001.
BIRD, Sheila; et al. Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly; Report of a working party on performance monitoring in the public services. J.R.Statist. Soc. A, 168, Part 1, p. 1-27, 2005.
BROOKS, Terrence. Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 37, n. 1, p. 34-36, 1986.
CAREY, Alan L.; COWLING, Michael G.; TAYLOR, Peter G. Assessing research in the mathematical sciences. Gazette of the Australian Math Society, v. 34, n. 2, p. 84-89, maio 2007.
COZZENS, Susan E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model.
Scientometrics, v. 15, n. 5-6, p. 437-447, 1989.
EGGHE, Leo. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, v. 69, n. 1, p. 131-152, 2006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
EVIDENCE REPORT. The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in the UK higher education system, 2007. [Um relatório produzido para a Research Policy Committee of Universities (Comissão Universitária de Política de Pesquisa), Reino Unido, por Evidence Ltda., uma empresa especializada em análises e interpretação de desempenho de pequisa. Evidence Ltda. tem “aliança estratégica” com a Thomson Scientific.]
EWING, John. Measuring journals. Notices of the AMS, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1049-1053, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ams.org/notices/200609/comm-ewing.pdf
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in
documentation through association of ideas. Science, v. 122, n. 3159, p.108-11, jul. 1955. Disponível em: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/science1955.pdf
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, v. 178, n. 4060, p. 471-479, 1972.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Current Comments, v. 2, p. 3, 12 jan. 1987.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Long-term vs. short-term journal impact (part II). The Scientist, v. 12, n. 14, p. 12-3, 6 jul. 1998.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Agony and the ecstasy – the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON PEER REVIEW AND BIBLIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION, 2005, Chicago. Paper… Chicago, 16 sep. 2005.
GOLDSTEIN, Harvey; SPIEGELHALTER, David J. League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, v. 159, n. 3, p 385-443, 1996.
HALL, Peter. Measuring research performance in the mathematical sciences in Australian universities. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, v. 34, n. 1, p. 26-30, 2007.
HIRSCH, J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, v. 102, n. 46, p. 16569-16573, 2006.
KINNEY, A. L. National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, v. 104, n. 46, p. 17943-17947, nov. 2007.
LEHMANN, Sune; JACKSON, Andrew D.; LAUTRUP, Benny E. Measures for measures, Nature, v. 444, n. 21, p. 1003-1004, 2006.
MACDONALD, Stuart; KAM, Jacqueline. Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Information Science, v. 33, p. 702-717, 2007.
MARTIN, Ben R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research, Scientometrics, v. 36, n. 3, p. 343-362, 1996. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599
MARTIN, Ben R.; IRVINE, John. Assessing basic research. Research Policy, v. 12, p. 61-90, 1983. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7.
MEHO, Lokman; YANG, Kiduk. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 13, p. 2105-2125, 2007. Disponivel em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677.
MOLINARI, J. F., MOLINARI, A. A new methodology for ranking scientific nstitutions. To appear in Scientometrics, 2008. Disponível em: http://imechanica.org/files/paper.pdf
MONASTERSKY, R. The number that’s devouring science. Chronicle Higher Ed., v. 52, n. 8, 2005. Disponível em: http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm
ROSSNER, Mike; VAN EPPS, Heather; HILL, Emma. Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, v. 179, n. 6, p. 1091-1092, 17 dez. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
SEGLEN, P. O. Why the impact factor for journals should not be used for evaluating research; BMJ, v. 314, n. 497, 15 fev. 1997. Disponível em: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497.
SIDIROPOULOS, Antonis; KATSAROS, Dimitrios; MANOLOPOULOS, Yannis. Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks, v. 72, n. 2, p. 253-280, aug. 2007.
STRINGER, M. J.; SALES-PARDO, M.; NUNES AMARAL, L. A. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE, v. 3, n. 2, 2008. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001683
THOMSON: JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS. 2007. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jcr/
THOMSON: SELECTION. 2007. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/
THOMSON: IMPACT FACTOR. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor/
THOMSON: HISTORY. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/citationindexing/history/
THOMSON: FIFTY YEARS. Disponível em: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/citationindexing/50y-citationindexing.
Descargas
Publicado
2009-07-15
Cómo citar
ADLER, Robert; EWING, John; TAYLOR, Peter. Estatísticas de citações. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, Londrina, v. 14, n. 1, p. 69–100, 2009. DOI: 10.5433/2176-6665.2009v14n1p69. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/3348. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.
Número
Sección
Dossier
Licencia
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en Mediations son del autor; En caso de republicación parcial o total de la primera publicación, se solicita a los autores que indiquen la publicación original en la revista.
Mediações utiliza la licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, que proporciona acceso abierto, permitiendo a cualquier usuario leer, descargar, copiar y difundir su contenido, siempre que esté debidamente referenciado.
Las opiniones emitidas por los autores de los artículos son de su exclusiva responsabilidad.
