Transliteracy: expanded materialities of contemporary literature in the context of technoculture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1678-2054.2023vol43n1p23

Keywords:

intermediality, transliteracy, expanded materiality, contemporary literature

Abstract

After much was said about the apocalypse of the book and of literature as paradigms of culture at the edge of 2000, we have confirmed that printed literature did not die or completely move to the digital world, but rather has received feedback from it and from its dynamics and has renewed its modes of production based on the tension between the dematerialization imposed by virtuality and a return to materiality, expanded into innumerable possibilities and with a constant impetus for renewal. Thus, in the context of technoculture, literature has renewed and diversified its modes of production in contact with other media spheres, it has received feedback from technology and has expanded its processes, on the one hand, to carve out a place in the digital context and, on the other, to enhance and expand the materiality behind the experience of digitality, which we see crystallized in the rise of independent publishers, the constant production of artist's books and intermedial works, the incorporation of topics and processes from contemporary art and the consolidation of a “network literature” that draws from the digital universe. I am interested in dwelling on how the concept of literacy has been modified in light of this and how, in contemporary literature, the practices of writing and reading from one medium are transferred to another, generating a condition of transliteracy, in which I will dwell through some examples.

Author Biography

Maria Andrea Giovine Yáñez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM

Doctora en Letras por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Profesora Titular de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. ¿Qué es un dispositivo? seguido de El amigo y de La Iglesia y el Reino, Trad. Mercedes Ruvituso. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2015.

BOLTER, Jay David & Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

BREA, José Luis. La era postmedia: Acción comunicativa, prácticas (post) artísticas y dispositivos neomediales. Barcelona: Consorcio Salamanca, 2002.

Caja de té. Breves poemas japoneses. México: La Dïéresis, 2015.

COPE, Bill & Mary Kalantzis, eds. Multiliteracies. Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge, 2000.

DOLOUGHAN, Fiona. Contemporary Narrative.TextualProduction, Multimodality and Multiliteracies. London: Continuum, 2011.

ECO, Umberto. La obra abierta. Madrid: Planeta-Agostini, 1984 [1962].

FERRIS, Emil. My Favorite Thing is Monsters. Seattle: Fantagraphics, 2017.

GAINZA, María. El nervio óptico. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2017.

GARRUAMUÑO, Florencia. Mundos en común. Ensayos sobre la inespecificidad en el arte. Buenos Aires: FCE, 2015.

GIOVINE, María Andrea. El giro iconotextual en las letras mexicanas recientes (1960-2020). Apuntes para una historiografía. Philologia Hispalensis, Sevilla, vol. 35, n. 2, p. 111-127, 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2021.v35.i02.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2021.v35.i02.07

JENKINS, Henry. Transmedia Storytelling 101, 2007 & Transmedia Storytelling 202, 2011. Further Reflections. Disponibles en: http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html, 2007 & http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2011/08/defining_transmedia_further_re.html, 2011.

LIU, Alan. Research in the Technological, Social, and Cultural Practices of Online Reading. Transliteracies Project. 2005. Disponible en: https://liu.english.ucsb.edu/transliteracies-research-in-the-technological-social-and-cultural-practices-of-online-reading/.

LUDMER, Josefina. Literaturas postautónomas. Ciberletras. Revista de crítica literaria y de cultura, New York, n. 17, julio de 2007. Disponible en: https://www.lehman.cuny.edu/ciberletras/documents/ISSUE17.pdf.

SELBER, Suart. Multiliteracies for a digital age. Illinois: Southern Illinois U P, 2004.

SPERANZA, Graciela. Cronografías. Arte y ficciones de un tiempo sin tiempo. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2017.

POSADA, Adolfo R. La literatura después de la literatura: teoría y crítica del arte verbal postliterario en el siglo XXI. Revista Letral, Granada, n. 24, 2020, p. 76-99, 2020. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30827/rl.v0i24.8678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/rl.v0i24.8678

VILLANUEVA, Darío. Canon y post-literatura. Domingo Sánchez-Mesa, José Manuel Ruiz Martínez & Azucena González Blanco, orgs. Teoría y comparatismo: tradición y nuevos espacios: Actas del I Congreso Internacional de ASETEL. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada, 2014. 87-108. Disponible en: https://pt.scribd.com/document/372388642/Congreso-ASETEL-Importante-139#

YEHYA, Naief. Tecnocultura: el espacio íntimo transformado en tiempos de paz y guerra. Ciudad de México: Tusquets, 2008.

Published

2023-06-06

How to Cite

Giovine Yáñez, Maria Andrea. “Transliteracy: Expanded Materialities of Contemporary Literature in the Context of Technoculture”. Terra Roxa E Outras Terras: Revista De Estudos Literários, vol. 43, no. 1, June 2023, p. 23, doi:10.5433/1678-2054.2023vol43n1p23.