Producing randomness between plots in pepper and snap bean experiments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p3835Keywords:
Capsicum annuum, Phaseolus vulgaris L, Run test, Experimental planning, Experimental precision.Abstract
It is important to know the production variability among experimental plots in a protected environment because this information reduces error and increases the reliability of the results. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the spatial independence of fruit yield between plots of peppers and snap beans. Data on production uniformity were gathered from trials performed at the Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Santa Maria. Different plots sizes were created according to the number of plants in the crop row. To verify the randomness of the data distribution, we applied a sequence test between the plots within one line for individual and combined harvests. The use of ten plants per plot in experiments with peppers led to no randomness within the lines during the production of fruit fresh biomass. In experiments with snap beans conducted in a greenhouse, a plastic tunnel and by unprotected cultivation using plots with six or more basic units, 12 or more plants per plot produced random fresh biomass data for fruits within the crop row.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.