Experimental error in AFLP markers: consequence and estimative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n1p87Keywords:
Oryza sativa L., Genetic dissimilarity, Repeatability Mahalanobis.Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate and to compare the Dice coefficients of dissimilarity through experimental error estimation, from the use of replications composed by plant bulks. The estimate of this coefficient can become more reliable and robust with the use of replications in the molecular analyses. This procedure favors either the tests of hypotheses or the evaluation of the contrasts of interest, according to the objective of the experiment. Also, to compare these estimates with each other and with the genetic dissimilarity estimate based on agronomical traits measured in the field. Among the evaluated variables (genetic and morphological), the distances estimated with base in the use of molecular versus morphological data evidenced 80% of agreement in the estimated values, compared to 5% (P < 0.05) when the replications were used, in the molecular analysis. This way, it is evident that the use of replications in molecular analyses, besides supplying an estimate of the experimental error, enables an immediate gain through the tests of hypotheses, increasing both the reliability of the estimates of the genetic parameters (i.e., repeatability), and the agreement between laboratory and field data.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.