Experimental error in AFLP markers: consequence and estimative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n1p87Keywords:
Oryza sativa L., Genetic dissimilarity, Repeatability Mahalanobis.Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate and to compare the Dice coefficients of dissimilarity through experimental error estimation, from the use of replications composed by plant bulks. The estimate of this coefficient can become more reliable and robust with the use of replications in the molecular analyses. This procedure favors either the tests of hypotheses or the evaluation of the contrasts of interest, according to the objective of the experiment. Also, to compare these estimates with each other and with the genetic dissimilarity estimate based on agronomical traits measured in the field. Among the evaluated variables (genetic and morphological), the distances estimated with base in the use of molecular versus morphological data evidenced 80% of agreement in the estimated values, compared to 5% (P < 0.05) when the replications were used, in the molecular analysis. This way, it is evident that the use of replications in molecular analyses, besides supplying an estimate of the experimental error, enables an immediate gain through the tests of hypotheses, increasing both the reliability of the estimates of the genetic parameters (i.e., repeatability), and the agreement between laboratory and field data.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.