Evaluation of the milk physicochemical and microbiological patterns in different lactation phases in year seasons in milk farms of Paraná State – Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n3p651Keywords:
Acidity Dornic, SCC, Cryoscopy, Microbiology.Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological parameters of milk in different lactation phases during a year in two Dairy farms producing type A milk (Brazilian Standards) and classified as Farm 1 (G1) and Farm 2 (G2). The 320 raw milk samples were collected to analyze acidity Dornic, California Mastit Test (CMT), Somatic Cells Counting (SCC) and Cryoscopy (0H) during four seasons, in the period of January 00 to January 005. To data statistical analyses a General linear model (GLM) was used. The CMT, the SCC, acidity Dornic and Cryoscopy (0H) results were not significant (P>0.05), during the year seasons, between the farms and in the different lactation phases. The SCC (9 5.000 cells/mL) average results are in disagreement with the legislation. To the Dornic acidity and Cryoscopy (0H), the values had not exceeded the limit demanded by IN5 . The results of mesophilic aerobic organisms counting during autumn (G ) and during spring (G ) had revealed a disagreement with IN5 . High levels of coliforms (TC) and Escherichia coli (EC) were observed in G in all seasons when compared with G . It was demonstrated that the physical-chemistry and microbiological quality are important to handling practical during milks.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.