Numerical Simulations of High-lift Configurations on a NACA4412 Airfoil

Numerical Simulations of High-lift Configurations on a NACA4412 Airfoil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0375.2025.v46.53227

Keywords:

NACA 4412, high-lift devices, aerodynamics performance, CFD, flap

Abstract

This study examines the performance of different high-lift device configurations applied to a NACA 4412 airfoil, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages. Numerical simulations were performed using the open-source CFD code OpenFOAM® for five distinct configurations—plain flap, split flap, slotted flap, Fowler flap, and Junkers flap—under equivalent conditions, enabling a consistent comparison of results. All flaps were deflected by 10° and analyzed at a Reynolds number of 1.7 × 10⁵ over an angle-of-attack range from −4° to 16°. The Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model was adopted in all steady-state simulations. Quantitative analyses were conducted for the lift (Cl) and drag (Cd) coefficients per unit length, as well as for the pressure coefficient (Cp) on the airfoil surfaces, in addition to the velocity and pressure flow fields. The results demonstrated reliable and consistent predictions of lift and drag generation; however, convergence difficulties were observed at angles of attack near stall conditions. Furthermore, the simulations revealed superior lift performance for flap configurations commonly employed in the aeronautical industry, particularly the slotted flap and the Fowler flap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Odenir de Almeida, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Professor in the field of Aerodynamics in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil. His research and teaching activities focus on experimental and numerical aerodynamics, with emphasis on aerodynamic analysis and its applications in aerospace engineering.

Thiago Rezende de Castro, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Undergraduate student in Aeronautical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

References

Avraham, T. (2024). What a drag... CFD Israel Blog. https://cfdisraelblog.com/2024/01/19/what-a-drag-part-iii/

Bhandari, S. N. (2019). CFD analysis of flap of airplane wing span at subsonic speed. (2019). International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Technology, 11(1), 1-7. http://www.irphouse.com/ijiet19/ijietv11n1_01.pdf

Cahill, J. F. (1949). Summary of section data on trailing-edge high-lift devices (NACA-TR-938). National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930092003

Fonseca, W. D. P., Reis, M. W. F., Dias, P. F. L., & De Sousa Filho, L. M. (2019). CFD Analysis of airfoils with flaps for low Reynolds numbers. Revista De Engenharia E Pesquisa Aplicada, 4(4), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.25286/repa.v4i4.1240

Gudmundsson, S. (2021). General Aviation Aircraft Design : Applied Methods and Procedures. https://www.amazon.com/General-Aviation-Aircraft-Design-Procedures/dp/0128184655.

Jawahar, H. K., Ai, Q., & Azarpeyvand, M. (2018). Experimental and numerical investigation of aerodynamic performance for airfoils with morphed trailing edges. Renewable Energy, 127, 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.066

Kumar, M. S., & Kumar, K. N. (2013). Design and computational studies on plain flaps. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 3(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.9756/bijiems.4259

Ladson, C. L. (1988). Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19880019495/downloads/19880019495.pdf

Meredith, P. (1993). Viscous phenomena affecting high-lift systems and suggestions for future CFD development. In High-Lift System Aerodynamics (AGARD CP 515).

Murayama, M., Lei, Z., Mukai, J., & Yamamoto, K. (2006). CFD Validation for High-Lift Devices: Three-Element Airfoil. TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 49(163), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.49.40

Murayama, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2004). NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HIGH LIFT CONFIGURATIONS USING UNSTRUCTURED MESH METHOD (24th ed.). [International Congress of the Aeronautical Science]. https://icas.org/icas_archive/ICAS2004/PAPERS/414.PDF

Sarjito, N., Aklis, N., & Hartanto, T. (2017). An optimization of flap and slat angle airfoil NACA 2410 using CFD. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1831, 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4981179

Da Silva Oliveira, A. (2017). Low Reynolds Number Fowler Flap Design. https://ubibliorum.ubi.pt/bitstream/10400.6/7916/1/5366_10606.pdf

Tan, H. (2020). CFD Analysis of a Wind Turbine Airfoil with Flap. https://doi.org/10.7936/gdhb-zg49.

Van Dam, C. (2002). The aerodynamic design of multi-element high-lift systems for transport airplanes. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(2), 101-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-0421(02)00002-7

Rumsey, C. (2024). The Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. [S.l.: s.n.]. https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html (Accessed: 19/07/2024).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Almeida, O. de, & Castro, T. R. de. (2025). Numerical Simulations of High-lift Configurations on a NACA4412 Airfoil. Semina: Ciências Exatas E Tecnológicas, 46, e53227. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0375.2025.v46.53227

Issue

Section

Engineerings
Loading...