Control of wheat diseases using phosphites and acibenzolar-s-methyl alone or associated with piraclostrobina + epoxiconazole
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p433Keywords:
Phosphites, Drechslera tritici-repentis, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Puccinia triticina, Blumeria graminis, Yield.Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sources of phosphite to control leaf rust, powdery mildew, yellow and brown spot in the wheat crop in Palmeira, Paraná state, Brazil. The treatments were: four commercial sources of phosphites (A, B, C and D), applied at 1500 mL ha-1, (applied in rate of active product) acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) at 500 mL ha-1 (isolad or association), pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole (fungicide) at 400 mL ha-1) and phosphite A with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole (at 300 mL ha-1), phosphite A with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole (400 mL ha-1), acibenzolar-S-methyl with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole (400 mL ha-1) and control (water), . The experimental design adopted was complete randomized blocks with four replications. Regarding diseases, evaluations were done on the determination of severity and the calculation of the area below the curve of the disease progress in the flag leaf and entire plant. Leaf area index, thousand seeds weight, hectoliter weight and yield were also evaluated. Phosphite, independently source, did not act on leaf rust, powdery mildew, yellow and brown spot. The resistance inducer acibenzolar-S-methyl either isolated or associated to other fungicides affected leaf rust and powdery mildew of the wheat. Only phosphites associated to the fungicide controlled diseases, however there was no additional increase in yield whether compared to the control promoted by the fungicide.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.