The countercurrent: the Clastresian thought in Political Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2010v31n2p241Keywords:
Political philosophy, Political anthropology, Power. Indigenous societies, Indigenous leadership, Ethnocentrism.Abstract
This paper studies the work of Pierre Clastres (1934-1977), a French philosopher and anthropologist whose ethnological studies focus on Political Anthropology seeking the investigation of power within the so-called primitive societies, by making a change in the determination of the study subject matter of this science. It intends to show the construction of his general political anthropology aimed to demystify Indigenous societies as societies without State, and to view them as societies against the State, opposed to the state organization which characterizes the European political community and most societies influenced (or determined) by their cosmovision. This paper is split into two stages: the first is dedicated to societies against the State, which the philosopher-anthropologist discussed about, seeking to trail the road that would lead him to expose the need of a Copernicus revolution in the studies on the origin of power. The second stage deals with the return of ethnographic and ethnologic studies to Political Philosophy, examining our characteristic of being unnamable, those who have forgone freedom in order to abide by a model of oppression, those who overcame undesired animality, but denatured themselves into vassals of other men, their equals.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados são de direito da Revista Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores.
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.