Conjunctival and nasal microbiota evaluation of dogs submitted to dacryocystorhinostomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n6p2011Keywords:
Dacryocystorhinostomy, Dogs, Conjunctival microbiota, Nasal microbiota, Ocular microbiota.Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in the conjunctival and nasal microbiota, in the long term, of dogs undergoing bilateral dacryocystorhinostomy. Twelve male and female dogs (23 eyes), aged between 1 and 10 years, were enrolled in the study, selected on the basis of presentation with epiphora and chromodacryorrhea for at least six months. Cultures of material obtained from the ocular conjunctiva and nasal sinus of all dogs were evaluated to determine the conjunctival and nasal microbiota pre-and postoperatively (at 60, 120, and 240 d). Preoperatively, gram-negative bacteria were identified in the conjunctival microbiota of 66.5% (n=8), while gram-positive bacteria were found in 33.3% (n=4). Throughout the clinical evolution, a balance was found between the presence of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in the conjunctival microbiota. Pure cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25%) and Staphylococcus intermedius (25%) were found most frequently. Regarding the conjunctival microbiota, we can conclude that in obstructive diseases, there is a predominance of gram-negative bacteria in the lacrimal system, notably Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study did not observe an increase in bacterial counts in the nasal cavity through the new surgical pathway to the conjunctival sac.
Downloads
References
Andrade, A. L., Stringhini, G., Bonello, F. L., Marinho, M., & Perri, S. H. V. (2002). Conjunctival microbiota of healthy dogs from the city of Araçatuba - SP. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 65(3), 323-336. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492002000300008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492002000300008
Barnett, H. L., & Hunter, B. B. (1972). Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi (3nd ed.). Burgess Publishing Co.
Blicker, J. A., & Buffam, F. V. (1993). Lacrimal sac, conjuntival, and nasal culture results in dacryocystorhinostomy pacients. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstrutive Surgery, 9(1), 43-46. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199303000-00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-199303000-00006
Carter, G. R., & Chengappa, M. M. (1988). Essentials of veterinary bacteriology (4nd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
Evans, H. E., & De Lahunta, A. (2012). Miller’s anatomy of the dog (4nd ed.). WB Saunders.
Felchle, L., & Urbanz, J. L. (2001). Examining the anterior segment of the eye in small animals. Veterinary Medicine, 96(10), 792-799.
Giuliano, E. A., Pope, E. R., Champagne, E. S., & Moore, C. P. (2006). Dacryocystomaxillorhinostomy for chronic dacryocystitis in a dog. Veterinary Ophtalmology, 9(2), 89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2006.00443.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2006.00443.x
Grahn, B. H., & Sandmeyer, L. (2007). Diseases and surgery of the lacrimal and nasolacrimal system. In K. N. Gelatt (Ed.), Veterinary ophthalmology (4nd ed., pp. 618-661). Ames, IA..
Gussoni, F. R. A., & Barros, P. S. M. (2003). Epiphora in the dog: measurement of tear pH. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 40(2), 87-94. doi: 10.1590/S1413-95962003000200001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-95962003000200001
Kleiner, J. A., & Wouk, A. F. P. F. (2004). Dacriocistorrinostomia modificada no tratamento da epífora crônica em cães e gatos braquicefálicos. MedVep: Revista Científica de Medicina Veterinária: Pequenos Animais e Animais de Estimação, 2(5), 21-24.
Laforge, H. (1997). L´appareil lacrymal. Pratique Médicale et Chirurgicale de l´Animal de Compagnie, 32, 77-92.
Lavach, J. D. (1998). Lacrimal system. In D. Slatter (Ed.), Textbook of small animal surgery (2nd ed., pp. 1415-1427). Philadelphia.
Larrone, D. H. (1995). Medically important fungi: a guide to identification (3nd ed.). ASM Press.
Machado, M. F. S., Folks, P. D., Hawk, M. S. A., & Silva, R. M. (2008). Afecção e tratamento do sistema de drenagem lacrimal canino. MedVep: Revista Científica de Medicina Veterinária: Pequenos Animais e Animais de Estimação, 6(17), 82-91.
McDonald, P. J., & Watson, A. D. J. (1976). Microbial flora of normal canine conjunctivae. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 17(12), 809-812. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1976.tb06947.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1976.tb06947.x
Nykamp, S. G., Scrivan, P. V., & Pease, A. P. (2004). Computed tomography dacryocystography: evaluation of the nasolacrimal apparatus. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 45(1), 23-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04004.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04004.x
Ota, J., Perce, J. W., Finn, M. J., Johnson, G. C., & Giuliano, E. A. (2009). Dacryops (lacrimal cyst) in three young Labrador retrievers. Journal of the American Hospital Association, 45(4), 191-196. doi: 10.5326/0450191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5326/0450191
Prado, M. R., Rocha, M. F., Brito, E. H., Girão, M. D., Monteiro, A. J., Teixeira, M. F., & Sidrim, J. J. (2005). Survery of bacterial microrganisms in the conjunctival sac of clinically normal dogs and dogs with ulcerative keratitis in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 8(1), 33-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2005.04061.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2005.04061.x
Santos, L. G. F., Almeida, A. B. P. F., Silva, M. C., Oliveira, J. T., Dutra, V., & Sousa, V. R. F. (2009). Microbiota conjuntival de cães hígidos e com afecções oftálmicas. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 37(2), 165-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.16245
Slatter, D. (2005). Fundamentals of veterinary ophthalmology (4nd ed.). Saunders.
Smith, L. H., Adams, L., Derré, M., & Townsend, W. M. (2023). Endoscopic-guided diagnosis of and interventional stent placement for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a horse. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 26(3), 256-261. doi: 10.1111/vop.13094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.13094
Steinmetz, A., Dohmann, G. W. J., & Blobner, C. C. (2022). Dacryocystitis in dogs caused by foreign bodies: diagnosis and therapy in 14 cases. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 25(2), 180-185. doi: 10.1111/vop.12968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12968
Wang, L., Pan, Q., Zhang, L., Xue, Q., Cui, J., & Qi, C. (2008). Investigation of bacterial microorganisms in the conjuctival sac of clinically normal dogs and dogs with ulcerative keratitis in Beijing, China. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 11(3), 145-149. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00579.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00579.x
Waring, G. O. (1998). Corneal structure and pathophysiology. In H. Leibowitz (Ed.), Corneal disorders: clinical diagnosis and management (2nd ed., pp. 3-25). St Louis, MO.
Wouk, A. F. P. F., Cirio, S., Kasecker, G. G., Ramos, C., & Richter, R. K. (1999). Novo modelo experimental de glaucoma em cão para o estudo da cicatrização após cirurgia filtrante associada ao uso de agente antifibrótico. Archives of Veterinary Science, 4(1), 103-109. doi: 10.5380/avs.v4i1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v4i1.3791
Wouk, A. F. P. F., & Kleiner, J. A. (2003). Tratamento da obstrução das vias lacrimais em cães por meio da dacriocistorinostomia. MedVep: Revista Científica de Medicina Veterinária: Pequenos Animais e Animais de Estimação, 1(1), 19-22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
