A posição (realista ou racionalista?) do brasil em face da decisão da OMC

Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Junior

doi:10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195

THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION

Authors

Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Junior Centro Universitário de Brasília - UNICEUB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195

Keywords:

Theories of international relations, Where U.S. and Brazil before the WTO, School of three traditions.

Abstract

Negotiations between the countries that make up themodern international society have always been marked bydisagreements and conflicts of interests, especially traderelations. From the analysis of the discussion held betweenBrazil and the United States before the World Trade Organization- WTO, and culminated with the authorization of theinternational governing body for our country to take measuresfinancial compensation to the damage caused by agriculturalsubsidies to U.S. producers, will analyze, based on differenttheoretical perspectives of international law, as is the decisionmakingby countries in international relations. Emphasis will beplaced for the School of the Three Traditions, which is based onthe concepts of Hedley Bull and Martin Wight three traditionsof action in the international environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Junior, Centro Universitário de Brasília - UNICEUB

Advogado. Mestre em Direitodas Relações Internacionaispelo Centro Universitário deBrasília - UniCEUB

Downloads

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published

2012-10-25

How to Cite

Bilacchi Junior, G. V. (2012). THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION. Scientia Iuris, 16(1), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2012)

Section

Artigos

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal's articles are of their sole responsibility.