THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION

Authors

  • Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Junior Centro Universitário de Brasília - UNICEUB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195

Keywords:

Theories of international relations, Where U.S. and Brazil before the WTO, School of three traditions.

Abstract

Negotiations between the countries that make up themodern international society have always been marked bydisagreements and conflicts of interests, especially traderelations. From the analysis of the discussion held betweenBrazil and the United States before the World Trade Organization– WTO, and culminated with the authorization of theinternational governing body for our country to take measuresfinancial compensation to the damage caused by agriculturalsubsidies to U.S. producers, will analyze, based on differenttheoretical perspectives of international law, as is the decisionmakingby countries in international relations. Emphasis will beplaced for the School of the Three Traditions, which is based onthe concepts of Hedley Bull and Martin Wight three traditionsof action in the international environment.

Author Biography

Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Junior, Centro Universitário de Brasília - UNICEUB

Advogado. Mestre em Direitodas Relações Internacionaispelo Centro Universitário deBrasília – UniCEUB

Published

2012-10-25

How to Cite

Bilacchi Junior, G. V. (2012). THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION. Scientia Iuris, 16(1), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195

Issue

Section

Artigos