A (In) Constitucionalidade da Súmula 385 Superior Tribunal de Justiça
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2013v17n1p27Keywords:
Previous judicial, precedent persuasive, precedent from the Supreme Court 385, constitutionality.Abstract
This article seeks to examine, in the light of the foundation of human dignity and the fundamental rights and guarantees enshrined in the Constitution of 1988, the constitutionality of Precedent 385, edited from the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). This statement prohibits the consumer that has at least one legitimate record in a credit protection agency of judicially demanding compensation for moral damage in the face of subsequent annotation, although the latter is irregular. The method of approach used in this study was deductive, scientific procedure, with the use of techniques of bibliographic research and case.Downloads
Published
2013-08-05
How to Cite
Pozzetti, V. C., & Pantoja, A. S. C. (2013). A (In) Constitucionalidade da Súmula 385 Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Scientia Iuris, 17(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2013v17n1p27
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal’s articles are of their sole responsibility.
