Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2005v9n0p229Keywords:
Civil process, collective guardianship, jurisdiction, class action lawsuit, litigious, diffuse interests, sentence, return sentence, not-for-profits, efectivittyAbstract
Evaluates and compares the treatment by the legal system of common rights in individual and class action lawsuits which underly the essential conceptual differences based on the re-evaluation of the classic litigious concept and the reasons for these differences. Provides a systemic vision of the Brazilian standards concerning collective tutelage and critique of the jurisdiction regarding common rights, collective and homogeneous individuals. Analyses weak and strong political organizational issues of the society in the and their role in defense of the community interests by not-for-profit organizations. Concludes for the necessity to obtain effective judicial decision through the rupture of the paradigms concerning the neutrality of judges and the participation of the organized community in reformulating the classic legal process concepts linked to the conflict of legal rights and the control by the information dissemination by the media.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal's articles are of their sole responsibility.













