Ambidiestreza organizacional e innovación: un estudio bibliométrico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n3p352Palabras clave:
Ambidestreza organizacional, Innovación organizacional, Análisis de redes, BibliometríaResumen
Objetivo: El estudio buscó presentar un análisis bibliométrico del tema de la ambidestreza organizacional y la innovación, explorando el análisis de las redes de coocurrencia de palabras clave y la cocitación de referencias citadas.Metodología: La investigación siguió los siguientes pasos: diseño de la investigación con la definición del objetivo y de la expresión de búsqueda; elección de las unidades y de los tipos de análisis; investigación en la base de datos Scopus; obtención de redes mediante VOSviewer; cálculo de las métricas de las redes mediante Gephi; visualización e interpretación de los resultados.
Resultados: La red de coocurrencias mostró los conceptos de investigación más relevantes sobre el tema. La rede de cocitación permitió identificar los frentes de investigación.
Conclusiones: Se concluye que los tipos de análisis reconocen la fuerte relación entre los temas de ambidestreza e innovación y su influencia en la capacidad de respuesta de las organizaciones. En escenarios complejos de volatilidad y transformación, las organizaciones se ven cada vez más urgidas a adaptarse y aprovechar nuevas oportunidades, al tiempo que necesitan seguir siendo competitivas en los mercados en los que ya están insertas y donde la competencia es también cada vez más feroz.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
ANDERSON, N.; POTOCNIK, K;HHOU, J. Innovation and creativity in organizations creatia. Jornal of Management, V. 40, n.5, p.1297-333, 2014.
BALL, R. An introduction to bibliometrics – new development and trends. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing, 2017.
BASTIAN, M.; HEYMANN, S.; JACOMY, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: INTERNATIONAL AAAI CONFERENCE ON WEBLOGS AND SOCIAL MEDIA, 3., 2009, San Jose. Proceedings […]. Palo Alto: AAAI Publications, 2009. p. 361-362.
BENNER, M.; TUSHMAN, M. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of
Management Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 238–256, 2003.
BUI, Tat-Dat; TSAI, Feng Ming; TSENG, Ming-Lang; TAN, Raymond; YU, Krista Danielle; LIM, Ming. Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: a data driven analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 26, p. 373-410, 2021.
BURG, D.; SCHACHTER, E.; MEYER, P.; YUNG, J.; WERNICK, I.; CURRY, A. Loglet Lab. Versão 4.0, 2017. Disponível em: http://logletlab.com. Acesso em: 19 out. 2020.
CAO, Q.; GEDAJLOVIC, E.; ZHANG, H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 781–796, 2009.
CHEN, Yu-Heng; CHEN, Chia-Yon; LEE, Shun-Chung. Technology forecasting of new clean energy: The example of hydrogen energy and fuel cell. African Journal of Business Management, v. 4, n. 7, p. 1372–1380, 2010.
CIRIBELLI, M. C. Como elaborar uma dissertação de mestrado através da pesquisa científica. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras, 2003.
ERNST, H. The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC - technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, v. 9, n. 4, p. 361–381, 1997.
EVERS, N.; ANDERSSON, S. Predictive and effectual decisionmaking in high-tech international new ventures: a matter of sequential ambidexterity. International Business Review, v. 30, n. 1, 2021.
FRANKLIN, J.; JOHNSTON, R. Co-citation bibliometric modelling for S&T and R&D management. In: VAN RAAN, Anthony F. J. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988. p. 325-389.
GIBSON, C.; BIRKINSHAW, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 209–226, 2004.
GOUVEIA, F. C. Altmetria: métricas de produção científica para além das citações. Liinc em Revista, v. 9, n. 1, p. 214-227, 2013.
GRIFFITH, B.; SMALL, H.; STONEHILL, J.; DEY, S. The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro- and microstructure for science. Science Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 339–365, 1974.
GUPTA, A.; SMITH, K.; SHALLEY, C. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, v. 49, n. 4, p. 693–706, 2006.
HE, P., PEI, Y.; LIN, C. P.; Y. D. Ambidextrous marketing capabilities, exploratory and exploitative market-based innovation, and innovation performance: an empirical study on China manufacturing sector. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2021.
HE, Zi-Lin; WONG, Poh-Kam. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, v. 15, n. 4, p. 481–494, 2004.
HILL, C. W. L.; JONES, G. Strategic management: an integrated approach. 10. ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2012.
JACOBS, D. Demystification of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics and Webometrics. In: DIS ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 11., 2010, Richarsbay. Proceedings […]. Richarsbay: University of Zululand, 2010. p. 1-18.
ANSEN, J.; VAN DEN BOSCH, F.; VOLBERDA, H. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, v. 52, n. 11, p. 1661-1674, 2006.
JUNNI, P.; SARALA, R.; TARAS, V.; TARBA, S. Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 27, n. 4, p. 299–312, 2013.
KUCHARAVY, D.; DE GUIO, R. Application of S-shaped curves. Procedia Engineering, v. 9, p. 559-572, 2011.
LAVIE, D.; STETTNER, Uriel; TUSHMAN, M. Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 4, n. 1, p. 109-155, 2010.
LEVINTHAL, D.; MARCH, J. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, v. 14, n. S2, p. 95-112, 1993.
MARCH, J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.
NEWMAN, M. Networks: an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
OECD - Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. 4. ed. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing, 2018.
O’REILLY, C.; TUSHMAN, M. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, p. 74–81, 2004.
PHAAL, R.; O’SULLIVAN, E.; ROUTLEY, M.; FORD,S.; PROBERT, D. A framework for mapping industrial emergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 78, n. 2, p. 217-230, 2011.
PERTUSA-ORTEGA, E.; TARÍ, J. J.; PEREIRA-MOLINER, J. ; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J.; LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. Developing ambidexterity through quality management and their effects on performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, v. 92, p. 1-11, 2021.
PRITCHARD, A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, v. 25, n. 4, p. 348-349, 1969.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 375–409, 2008.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J.; PROBST, G.; TUSHMAN, M. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 685-695, 2009.
ROSING, K.; FRESE, M.; BAUSCH, A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, v. 22, n. 5, p. 956-974, 2011.
SANTOS, A.; FAZION, C.; MEROE, Giuliano. Inovação: um estudo sobre a evolução do conceito de Schumpeter. Cadernos de Administração (PUC-SP), v. 5, n. 1, 2011. SCHUMPETER, Joseph Alois. A teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1988. SCHMIDT.
Frank. Meta-analysis: a constantly evolving research integration tool. Organizational Research Methods, v. 11, n. 1, p. 96-113, 2008.
SILUO, Y.; QINGLI, Y.; DONG, J. Are scientometrics, informetrics, and bibliometrics different? Data Science and Informatics, v. 1, n. 1, 2020.
SMITH, W.; TUSHMAN, M. Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 5, p. 522-536, 2005.
VAN DEN BUUSE, D.; VAN WINDEN, W.; SCHRAMA, W. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sustainable Urban Innovation: An Ambidexterity Perspective toward Smart Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, v. 28, n. 1-2, p. 175-197, 2021.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523–538, 2010.
VAN ECK, N .J. ; WALTMAN, Ludo. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.vosviewer.com/ documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16.pdf. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2021
WALTMAN, L.; VAN ECK, N. J.; NOYONS, E. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n. 4, p. 629-635, 2010.
ZHANG, Shaoling Katee; TANG, Tanya Ya; WU, Fang. The ambidextrous patterns for managing technological and marketing innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 92, p. 34-44, jan. 2021.
ZHOU, Luanping; PENG, Michael Yao-Ping; SHAO, Lijin; YEN, Hsin-Yi; LIN, Ku-Ho; ANSER, Muhammad Khalid. Ambidexterity in Social Capital, Dynamic Capability, and SMEs’ Performance: Quadratic Effect of Dynamic Capability and Moderating Role of Market Orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, 2021.
ZUOIC, I.; CATER, T. Bibliometric metrods in management organization. Organizational Research Methods, v. 18, n. 3, p. 429-472, 2014.
BALL, R. An introduction to bibliometrics – new development and trends. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing, 2017.
BASTIAN, M.; HEYMANN, S.; JACOMY, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: INTERNATIONAL AAAI CONFERENCE ON WEBLOGS AND SOCIAL MEDIA, 3., 2009, San Jose. Proceedings […]. Palo Alto: AAAI Publications, 2009. p. 361-362.
BENNER, M.; TUSHMAN, M. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of
Management Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 238–256, 2003.
BUI, Tat-Dat; TSAI, Feng Ming; TSENG, Ming-Lang; TAN, Raymond; YU, Krista Danielle; LIM, Ming. Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: a data driven analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 26, p. 373-410, 2021.
BURG, D.; SCHACHTER, E.; MEYER, P.; YUNG, J.; WERNICK, I.; CURRY, A. Loglet Lab. Versão 4.0, 2017. Disponível em: http://logletlab.com. Acesso em: 19 out. 2020.
CAO, Q.; GEDAJLOVIC, E.; ZHANG, H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 781–796, 2009.
CHEN, Yu-Heng; CHEN, Chia-Yon; LEE, Shun-Chung. Technology forecasting of new clean energy: The example of hydrogen energy and fuel cell. African Journal of Business Management, v. 4, n. 7, p. 1372–1380, 2010.
CIRIBELLI, M. C. Como elaborar uma dissertação de mestrado através da pesquisa científica. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras, 2003.
ERNST, H. The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC - technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, v. 9, n. 4, p. 361–381, 1997.
EVERS, N.; ANDERSSON, S. Predictive and effectual decisionmaking in high-tech international new ventures: a matter of sequential ambidexterity. International Business Review, v. 30, n. 1, 2021.
FRANKLIN, J.; JOHNSTON, R. Co-citation bibliometric modelling for S&T and R&D management. In: VAN RAAN, Anthony F. J. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988. p. 325-389.
GIBSON, C.; BIRKINSHAW, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 209–226, 2004.
GOUVEIA, F. C. Altmetria: métricas de produção científica para além das citações. Liinc em Revista, v. 9, n. 1, p. 214-227, 2013.
GRIFFITH, B.; SMALL, H.; STONEHILL, J.; DEY, S. The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro- and microstructure for science. Science Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 339–365, 1974.
GUPTA, A.; SMITH, K.; SHALLEY, C. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, v. 49, n. 4, p. 693–706, 2006.
HE, P., PEI, Y.; LIN, C. P.; Y. D. Ambidextrous marketing capabilities, exploratory and exploitative market-based innovation, and innovation performance: an empirical study on China manufacturing sector. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2021.
HE, Zi-Lin; WONG, Poh-Kam. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, v. 15, n. 4, p. 481–494, 2004.
HILL, C. W. L.; JONES, G. Strategic management: an integrated approach. 10. ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2012.
JACOBS, D. Demystification of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics and Webometrics. In: DIS ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 11., 2010, Richarsbay. Proceedings […]. Richarsbay: University of Zululand, 2010. p. 1-18.
ANSEN, J.; VAN DEN BOSCH, F.; VOLBERDA, H. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, v. 52, n. 11, p. 1661-1674, 2006.
JUNNI, P.; SARALA, R.; TARAS, V.; TARBA, S. Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 27, n. 4, p. 299–312, 2013.
KUCHARAVY, D.; DE GUIO, R. Application of S-shaped curves. Procedia Engineering, v. 9, p. 559-572, 2011.
LAVIE, D.; STETTNER, Uriel; TUSHMAN, M. Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 4, n. 1, p. 109-155, 2010.
LEVINTHAL, D.; MARCH, J. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, v. 14, n. S2, p. 95-112, 1993.
MARCH, J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.
NEWMAN, M. Networks: an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
OECD - Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. 4. ed. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing, 2018.
O’REILLY, C.; TUSHMAN, M. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, p. 74–81, 2004.
PHAAL, R.; O’SULLIVAN, E.; ROUTLEY, M.; FORD,S.; PROBERT, D. A framework for mapping industrial emergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 78, n. 2, p. 217-230, 2011.
PERTUSA-ORTEGA, E.; TARÍ, J. J.; PEREIRA-MOLINER, J. ; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J.; LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. Developing ambidexterity through quality management and their effects on performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, v. 92, p. 1-11, 2021.
PRITCHARD, A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, v. 25, n. 4, p. 348-349, 1969.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 375–409, 2008.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J.; PROBST, G.; TUSHMAN, M. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 685-695, 2009.
ROSING, K.; FRESE, M.; BAUSCH, A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, v. 22, n. 5, p. 956-974, 2011.
SANTOS, A.; FAZION, C.; MEROE, Giuliano. Inovação: um estudo sobre a evolução do conceito de Schumpeter. Cadernos de Administração (PUC-SP), v. 5, n. 1, 2011. SCHUMPETER, Joseph Alois. A teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1988. SCHMIDT.
Frank. Meta-analysis: a constantly evolving research integration tool. Organizational Research Methods, v. 11, n. 1, p. 96-113, 2008.
SILUO, Y.; QINGLI, Y.; DONG, J. Are scientometrics, informetrics, and bibliometrics different? Data Science and Informatics, v. 1, n. 1, 2020.
SMITH, W.; TUSHMAN, M. Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 5, p. 522-536, 2005.
VAN DEN BUUSE, D.; VAN WINDEN, W.; SCHRAMA, W. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sustainable Urban Innovation: An Ambidexterity Perspective toward Smart Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, v. 28, n. 1-2, p. 175-197, 2021.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523–538, 2010.
VAN ECK, N .J. ; WALTMAN, Ludo. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.vosviewer.com/ documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16.pdf. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2021
WALTMAN, L.; VAN ECK, N. J.; NOYONS, E. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n. 4, p. 629-635, 2010.
ZHANG, Shaoling Katee; TANG, Tanya Ya; WU, Fang. The ambidextrous patterns for managing technological and marketing innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 92, p. 34-44, jan. 2021.
ZHOU, Luanping; PENG, Michael Yao-Ping; SHAO, Lijin; YEN, Hsin-Yi; LIN, Ku-Ho; ANSER, Muhammad Khalid. Ambidexterity in Social Capital, Dynamic Capability, and SMEs’ Performance: Quadratic Effect of Dynamic Capability and Moderating Role of Market Orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, 2021.
ZUOIC, I.; CATER, T. Bibliometric metrods in management organization. Organizational Research Methods, v. 18, n. 3, p. 429-472, 2014.
Descargas
Publicado
2021-10-30
Cómo citar
Moresi, E. A. D., Lemos, R. A. de L., & Hedler, H. C. (2021). Ambidiestreza organizacional e innovación: un estudio bibliométrico. Informação & Informação, 26(3), 352–376. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n3p352
Número
Sección
Artigos
Licencia
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
O conteúdo dos textos e a citação e uso de imagens submetidas são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.
Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a Informação & Informação.
