THE REASONING BEHIND THE DECISION AND THE GUARANTEES OF THE ADVERSARY PROCESS IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CONTROVERSY N° 566.622

Abstract

This research focuses on the rationale of
the decision and guarantees of the
adversarial process in the judgment of the
Extraordinary Appeal Representative of
Controversy No. 566.622, by the Federal
Supreme Court. The methodology
utilized was bibliographical review,
based on primary and secondary sources,
using the inductive method. This research
was developed with an analysis of the
Extraordinary Appeal Representative of
Controversy No. 566.622, specifically
Justice Marco Aurélio decision. To
achieve this study’s objective, it explored
the constitutional process and jurisdiction
in a Democratic State of Law, as well as
the participation of amicus curiae in the
trial of Extraordinary Appeal
Representative of Controversy No.
566.622.