A Interpretação da Experiência por Meio da Transitividade na Escrita Acadêmica de Estudantes em Disciplinas Humanísticas: uma análise sistêmico-funcional

Natalia Ignatieva; Daniel Rodríguez Vergara; Victoria Zamudio Jasso; Guillermo Daniel Jiménez Sánchez

doi:10.5433/2237-4876.2021v24n1p24

Autores/as

Natalia Ignatieva Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Daniel Rodríguez Vergara Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Victoria Zamudio Jasso Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Guillermo Daniel Jiménez Sánchez Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2237-4876.2021v24n1p24

Palabras clave:

Transitividade, Humanidades, Textos acadêmicos

Resumen

Este artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo cujo foco está na análise de textos discentes em três disciplinas das ciências humanas. O objetivo do estudo foi determinar, do ponto de vista sistêmico-funcional e por meio de uma análise da transitividade e dos tipos de processos, como diferentes campos do conhecimento e da experiência são representados nos textos dos alunos. Na análise, consideramos 80 textos escritos por estudantes de literatura, história e geografia em nível de graduação. Os textos pertencem a quatro gêneros distintos: ensaio, pergunta-resposta, resenha e relatório, todos redigidos em espanhol. A metodologia contou com análises quantitativa e qualitativa dos processos e sua tipologia em cada texto, seguida de uma análise comparativa entre as disciplinas e entre os gêneros de cada uma. Os resultados evidenciaram tanto semelhanças que identificam tais disciplinas como pertencentes à área de humanidades quanto diferenças que refletem seus campos específicos de conhecimento e sua construção de significados.

Biografía del autor/a

Natalia Ignatieva, Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Natalia Ignatieva is currently working at the National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation. She is a lecturer at the postgraduate program in linguistics. Her research interests include systemic functional linguistics and discourse analysis and she has published widely in these areas. She is a member of the National Research System.

Daniel Rodríguez Vergara, Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Daniel Rodríguez-Vergara is currently working at the Applied Linguistics Department of the National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). He obtained the PhD in Linguistics and the M.A. in Applied Linguistics at the UNAM, and the B.A. in Modern Languages at the Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla. He is a member of the National Research System.

Victoria Zamudio Jasso, Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

PhD in Linguistics from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Currently teaching to undergraduate and graduate students on academic writing and academic and professional discourses at the National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation (ENALLT-UNAM). Research interests include the interpersonal, textual and multimodal analysis of academic discourses.

Guillermo Daniel Jiménez Sánchez, Applied Linguistics Department, National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Guillermo Daniel Jiménez Sánchez works at the Applied Linguistics Department of the National School of Languages, Linguistics and Translation of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). He currently teaches undergraduate students at the Applied Linguistics Program, and his research interests include systemic functional linguistics, discourse analysis, and culture semiotics.

Citas

BANKS, D. On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. In: MILLER, D. R.; BAYLEY, P. (Eds.). Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. London: Equinox, 2016. (p. 21-40).

COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In: COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. (Eds.). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: Routledge, 1993. p. 1-23.

EGGINS, S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum, 2004.

GARCÍA, A. Construing experience in Spanish: Revisiting a Systemic Functional description of Spanish nuclear transitivity. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 46 (81), 2013, p. 29-55.

HALLIDAY, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold, 1994.

HALLIDAY, M.A.K.; MATTHIESSEN, C.M.I.M. Construing Experience Through Meaning. A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum, 1999.

HALLIDAY, M.A.K.; MATTHIESSEN, C.M.I.M. Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold, 2004.

HALLIDAY, M.A.K.; MATTHIESSEN, C.M.I.M. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge, 2014.

IGNATIEVA, N. Descripción sistémico funcional de la escritura académica estudiantil en español. Núcleo, 25, 2008, p. 173-95.

IGNATIEVA, N. Reflexiones sobre los procesos verbales en el marco sistémico. In: IGNATIEVA, N.; RODRÍGUEZ-VERGARA, D. (Eds.). Lingüística sistémico funcional en México: Aplicaciones e implicaciones. México: UNAM, 2016. p. 35-48.

IGNATIEVA, N.; COLOMBI, C. (Eds.). CLAE: El lenguaje académico en México y los Estados Unidos: un análisis sistémico funcional. México: UNAM, 2014.

IGNATIEVA, N.; RODRÍGUEZ-VERGARA, D.; ZAMUDIO, V. A functional study of transitivity and attitude in student writing in Spanish across disciplines: Making connections. In: BRISK, M. E.; SCHLEPPEGRELL, M. J. (Eds.). Language in action SFL: Theory across contexts. London: Equinox, in Press.

LAVID, J.; ARÚS, J. Contrasting nuclear transitivity in English and Spanish: A contrastive functional analysis. Languages in Contrast, 4 (1), 2004, p. 75-103.

MARTÍNEZ SERRANO, V. Una aproximación al discurso económico en textos periodísticos. In: IGNATIEVA, N.; RODRÍGUEZ-VERGARA, D. (Eds.). Lingüística sistémico funcional en México: Aplicaciones e implicaciones. México: UNAM, 2016. P. 79-95.

MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers, 1995.

MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. Transitivity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Achievements and challenges. In: CABRAL, S. R. S.; BARBARA, L. (Eds.). Estudos de transitividade em linguística sistêmico-funcional. Santa Maria: PPGL Editores, 2018. p. 14-108.

MONTERCÉ, J. Acerca de la transitividad de los procesos de comunicación en el discurso económico de divulgación argentino. Onomázein, 30, 2014, p. 21-36.

MOSS, G. Textbook language, ideology and citizenship. The case of a history book in Colombia. Functions of Language. Amsterdam, v. 17, n. 1, p. 71-93, 2010.

MOSS, G.; CHAMORRO, D. La enseñanza de la ciencia sin asidero en el tiempo ni en el espacio: Análisis del discurso de dos textos escolares. In:

BARLETTA, N.; CHAMORRO, D. (Eds.). El texto escolar y el aprendizaje: Enredos y desenredos (2nd. Ed.). Bogotá: Universidad del Norte, 2015. p. 152-177.

OTEÍZA, T. El discurso pedagógico de la historia: un análisis lingüístico sobre la construcción ideológica de la historia de Chile (1970-2001). Santiago de Chile: Frasis, 2006.

THOMPSON, G. Introducing Functional Grammar. (3rd ed.). London: Routledge, 2014.