Critical analysis of the BPSO-96 model of QWL based on A. N. Leontiev’s theory of activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2018v39n2p181Keywords:
Quality of working life, BPSO-96 model, Theory of activity.Abstract
This paper, a product of master’s dissertation whose methodology adopted was a theoretical-bibliographic research, discusses critically what has been agreed to be called as Quality of Working Life (QWL), from the A. N. Leontiev’s theory of activity. The specific object of analysis is the Byopsychosocial and Organizational model (BPSO-96). Thus, the study revises the concept and the history of QWL as well as presents a summary of the criticisms already pointed out by several authors. Then, it defines and analyzes the BPSO-96 model. The intention is to contribute with the critical studies of QWL, demonstrating how this is a management strategy whose hidden aim is to increase worker productivity through methods that objectively and subjectively manipulates work activity’s motives and obscure the alienated sense in workers consciousness. Thus, this paper aims to contribute to increase awareness of the actual objectives and consequences of the QWL to the working class, revealing that despite the pseudo-humanistic speech, this managing strategy serves mainly to increase the organization’s productivity.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.