Sociological theories on crime: comparative analysis of three complementary theories

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2017v38n2p215

Keywords:

Crime, Sociology of crime, Theory of differential association, Theory of self-control, Anomie theory.

Abstract

The article makes a comparative analysis of three sociological theories on crime: Edwin H. Sutherland's Theory of Differential Association (or Social Learning), Michael R. Gottfredson's and Travis Rirch's Theory of Self-Control, and the Anomie (or strain) Theory by Robert K. Merton. Our analysis shows that these three theories can be understood as convergent and complementary. We conclude by pointing out that, among so many sociological theories of crime, these three can be used for sociological analysis, so that one fills the gaps of the other. Thus, we do not need new sociological theories of crime, but rather a use of theories that complement and explain transversally the phenomena of crime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jair Araújo de Lima, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Doctorate in Social Sciences (PUC / Minas).

Published

2018-02-15

How to Cite

DE LIMA, Jair Araújo. Sociological theories on crime: comparative analysis of three complementary theories. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 215–232, 2018. DOI: 10.5433/1679-0383.2017v38n2p215. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminasoc/article/view/30998. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Artigos Seção Livre