How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379

Palabras clave:

Cynodon, Forage chemical composition, Grazing management, Megathyrsus, Urochloa.

Resumen

Pasture-based systems are prevalent among small-scale family farms. Many farmers consider that the nutritional value of the plant is more relevant than the canopy structure. This study aimed to analyze the various factors related to plant structure and chemical composition that most influence milk yield per hectare under rotational stocking. The experiment was performed at the Animal Husbandry Experimental Station of the Extreme South of Bahia. Three rotational stocking systems with three forage species [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. cv. Tifton 85, Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraés, and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa] were evaluated. Nine crossbred Holstein x Gyr cows were allocated to a balanced 3 x 3 Latin square design. The cows were rotated in three pastures every 14 days. The experimental period consisted of seven evaluation cycles of 42 days each. Cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate linear regression were the statistical techniques used to evaluate plant structure and morphological characteristics, and animal performance. Xaraés palisadegrass and Mombasa guinea grass were similar for all evaluated characteristics (P > 0.05), whereas Tifton 85 was different from them in terms of structural, morphological, and chemical composition characteristics (P < 0.05). In the PCA, 59.1% of the total variance was explained by components 1 and 2 for the structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition. Forage structural and morphological variables showed better results in the multivariate linear regression analysis for milk yield per hectare. Structural and morphological characteristics were more correlated with Mombasa guinea grass than Xaraés palisadegrass and Tifton 85. The structural and morphological characteristics of forages were the main factors determining milk yield per hectare in exclusively pasture-based systems with animals of low production.

Biografía del autor/a

Cláudia de Paula Rezende, Estação Experimental de Pecuária do Extremo Sul da Bahia

PhD. in Animal Science, Estação Experimental de Pecuária do Extremo Sul da Bahia, CEPLAC-ESSUL, Itabela, BA, Brazil.

José Marques Pereira, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz

Prof. PhD., Department of Agronomy, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, UESC, Ilhéus, BA, CEPLAC/CEPEC, Itabuna, BA, Brazil.

Albertí Ferreira Magalhães, Estação Experimental de Pecuária do Extremo Sul da Bahia

PhD. in Animal Science, CEPLAC/CEPEC, Itabuna, BA, Brazil.

Igor Machado Ferreira, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Master in Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, UNESP, Câmpus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

Bruno Grossi Costa Homem, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária

PhD. in Animal Science, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, EMBRAPA Agrobiologia, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.

Daniel Rume Casagrande, Universidade Federal de Lavras

Prof. PhD., Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, UFLA, Lavras, MG, Brazil.

Citas

Allen, V. G., Batello, C., Beretta, E. J., Hodgson, J., Kothmann, M., Li, X.,… Sanderson, M. (2011). An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science, 66(1), 2-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00780.x

Allison, C. D. (1985). Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants: a review. Journal of Range Management, 38(4), 305-311. doi: 10.2307/3899409

Anuário Leite (2018). Indicadores, tendências e oportunidades para quem vive no setor leiteiro. São Paulo: Editora Embrapa Gado de Leite. Recuperado de https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1094149/anuario-leite-2018-indicadores-tendencias-e-oportunidades-para-quem-vive-no-setor-leiteiro

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000). Official methods of analysis (17nd ed.). Arlington, VA: AOAC.

Barthram, G. T. (1985). Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. In Barthram, G. T. (Ed.), The hill farming research organization (pp. 29-30). Midlothian: Biennial Report, HFRO.

Baumont, R., Cohen-Salmon, D., Prache, S., & Sauvant, D. (2004). A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behavior in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 112(1-4), 5-28. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.005

Benvenutti, M. A., Pavetti, D. R., Poppi, D. P., Gordon, I. J., & Cangiano, C. A. (2016). Defoliation patterns and their implications for the management of vegetative tropical pastures to control intake and diet quality by cattle. Grass and Forage Science, 71(3), 424-436. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12186

Bibby, J., & Toutenburg, H. (1977). Prediction and improved estimation in linear models. Berlin, Germany: John Wiley & Sons.

Borges, B. M. M. N., Silveira, M. L., Cardoso, S. S., Moline, E. F. V., Coutinho, A. M., Neto, Lucas, F. T.,... Coutinho, E. L. M. (2017). Growth, herbage accumulation, and nutritive value of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass as affected by nitrogen fertilization strategies. Crop Science, 57(6), 3333-3342. doi: 10. 2135/cropsci2016.10.0890

Carnevalli, R. A., Congio, G. F. S., Sbrissia, A. F., & Silva, S. C. (2021). Growth of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombaça as affected by grazing strategies and environmental seasonality. II. Dynamics of herbage accumulation. Crop and Pasture Science, 72(1), 66-74. doi: 10.1071/CP20199

Carvalho, P. C. F., Bremm, C., Mezzalira, J. C., Fonseca, L., Trindade, J. K. da, Bonnet, O. J. F.,... Laca, E. A. (2015). Can animal performance be predicted from short-term grazing processes? Animal Production Science, 55(3), 319-327. doi: 10.1071/AN14546

Castro-Montoya, J. M., & Dickhoefer, U. (2020). The nutritional value of tropical legume forages fed to ruminants as affected by their growth habit and fed form: A systematic review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 269(1), 114642. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114641

Claessen, M. E. C., Barreto, W. O. de, Paula, J. L., & Duarte, M. N. (1997). Manual de métodos de análise de solo. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos, EMBRAPA.

Congio, G. F., Batalha, C. D., Chiavegato, M. B., Berndt, A., Oliveira, P. P., Frighetto, R. T.,... Silva, S. C. (2018). Strategic grazing management towards sustainable intensification at tropical pasture-based dairy systems. Science of the Total Environment, 636(1), 872-880. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.301

Delevatti, L. M., Cardoso, A. S., Barbero, R. P., Leite, R. G., Romanzini, E. P., Ruggieri, A. C., & Reis, R. A. (2019). Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield, forage quality, and animal performance in a tropical pasture. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44138-x

Demski, J. P., Arcaro, I., Jr., Gimenes, F. M. A., Toledo, L. M., Miranda, M. S., Giacomini, A. A., & Silva, G. A. (2019). Milk production and ingestive behavior of cows grazing on Marandu and Mulato II pastures under rotational stocking. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 48(1), e20180231. doi: 10.1590/rbz 4820180231

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2018). Sistema brasileiro de classificação do solo (5a ed.). Brasília, DF: EMBRAPA - Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos.

Euclides, V. P. B., Carpejani, G. C., Montagner, D. B., Nascimento, D., Jr., Barbosa, R. A., & Difante, G. S. (2018). Maintaining post‐grazing sward height of Panicum maximus (cv. Mombaça) at 50 cm led to higher animal performance compared with post grazing height of 30 cm. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1), 174-182. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12292

Fonseca, L., Carvalho, P. C. F., Mezzalira, J. C., Bremm, C., Galli, J. R., & Gregorini, P. (2013). Effect of sward surface height and level of herbage depletion on bite features of cattle grazing Sorghum bicolor swards. Journal of Animal Science, 91(9), 4357-4365. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5602

Fonseca, L., Mezzalira, J. C., Bremm, C., Arruda, R. S., Fº., Gonda, H. L., & Carvalho, P. C. F. (2012). Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livestock Science, 145(1-3), 205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02

Fukumoto, N. M., Damasceno, J. C., Deresz, F., Martins, C. E., Cóser, A. C., & Santos, G. T. (2010). Produção e composição do leite, consumo de matéria seca e taxa de lotação em pastagens de gramíneas tropicais manejadas sob lotação rotacionada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(1), 1548-1557. doi: 10. 1590/S1516-35982010000700022

Geremia, E. V., Pereira, L. E., Paiva, A. J., Oliveira, L. P., & Silva, S. C. (2014). Intake rate and nutritive value of elephant grass cv. Napier subjected to strategies of rotational stocking management. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 2(1), 51-52. doi: 10.17138/tgft(2)51-52

Gomes, F. K., Oliveira, M. D. B. L., Homem, B. G. C., Boddey, R. M., Bernardes, T. F., Gionbelli, M. P.,... Casagrande, D. R. (2018). Effects of grazing management in brachiaria grass-forage peanut pastures on canopy structure and forage intake. Journal of Animal Science, 96(9), 3837-3849. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky 236

Gregorini, P., Gunter, S. A., Bowman, M. T., Caldwell, J. D., Masino, C. A., Coblentz, W. K., & Beck, P. A. (2011). Effect of herbage depletion on short-term foraging dynamics and diet quality of steers grazing wheat pastures. Journal of Animal Science, 89(11), 3824-3830. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3725

Guzatti, G. C., Duchini, P. G., Sbrissia, A. F., Mezzalira, J. C., Almeida, J. G. R., Carvalho, P. C. F., & Ribeiro, H. M. N., Fº. (2017). Changes in the short‐term intake rate of herbage by heifers grazing annual grasses throughout the growing season. Grassland Science, 63(4), 255-264. doi: 10.1111/grs.12 170

Hack, E. C., Bona, A., Fº., Moraes, A., Carvalho, P. C. F., Martinichen, D., & Pereira, T. N. (2007). Características estruturais e produção de leite em pastos de capim-mombaça (Panicum maximum Jacq.) submetidos a diferentes alturas de pastejo. Ciência Rural, 37(1), 218-222. doi: 10.1590/S0103-8478200 7000100035

Holden, L. A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 82(8), 1791-1794. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3

Homem, B. G. C., Lima, I. B. G., Spasiani, P. P., Borges, L. P., Boddey, R. M., Dubeux, J. C. B., Jr.,... Casagrande, D. R. (2021b). Palisadegrass pastures with or without nitrogen or mixed with forage peanut grazed to a similar target canopy height. 2. Effects on animal performance, forage intake and digestion, and nitrogen metabolism. Grass and Forage Science, 76(3), 1-13. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12533

Homem, B. G. C., Lima, I. B. G., Spasiani, P. P., Ferreira, I. M., Boddey, R. M., Bernardes, T. F.,... Casagrande, D. R. (2021a). Palisadegrass pastures with or without nitrogen or mixed with forage peanut grazed to a similar target canopy height. 1. Effects on herbage mass, canopy structure and forage nutritive value. Grass and Forage Science, 76(3), 1-14. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12532

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas (2018). Censo agropecuário. Recuperado de https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/3093/agro_2017_resultados_preliminares.pdf

Jank, L., Barrios, S. C., Valle, C. B. do, Simeão, R. M., & Alves, G. F. (2014). The value of improved pastures to Brazilian beef production. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(11), 1132-1137. doi: 10.1071/CP1 3319

Lawrence, I., & Lin, K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255-268. doi: 10.2307/2532051

Legrand, A. L., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2009). Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(8), 3651-3658. doi: 10.3168/ jds.2008-1733

Maciel, G. A., Braga, G. J., Guimarães, R., Jr., Ramos, A. K. B., Carvalho, M. A., Fernandes, F. D.,... Jank, L. (2018). Seasonal liveweight gain of beef cattle on guineagrass pastures in the Brazilian cerrados. Agronomy Journal, 110(2), 480-487. doi: 10.2134/agronj2017.05.0262

Martha, G. B., Jr., Alves, E., & Contini, E. (2012). Land-saving approaches and beef production growth in Brazil. Agricultural Systems, 110(1), 173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.001

Mayer, D. G., Stuart, M. A., & Swain, A. J. (1994). Regression of real-world data on model output: an appropriate overall test of validity. Agricultural Systems, 45(1), 93-104. doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(94)9 0282-8

Muñoz, C., Letelier, P. A., Ungerfeld, E. M., Morales, J. M., Hube, S., & Pérez-Prieto, L. A. (2016). Effects of pregrazing herbage mass in late spring on enteric methane emissions, dry matter intake, and milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy science, 99(10), 7945-7955. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-10919

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Mcglinn, D.,… Wagner, H. (2018). Vegan: community ecology packager package. Version 2.5-2. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project. org/package=vegan

Oliveira, M. A., Pereira, O. G., Ribeiro, K. G., Santos, M. E. R., Chizzotti, F. H. M., & Cecon, P. R. (2011). Produção e valor nutritivo do capim-coastcross sob doses de nitrogênio e idades de rebrotação. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 63(3), 694-703. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352011000300 022

Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(5), 1633-1644. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1633-200 7

Pell, A. N., & Schofield, P. (1993). Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science, 76(4), 1063-1073. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77435-4

Provenza, F. D., Gregorini, P., & Carvalho, P. C. F. (2015). Synthesis: foraging decisions link plants, herbivores and human beings. Animal Production Science, 55(3), 411-425. doi: 10.1071/AN14679

R Core Team (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/

Rouquette, F. M., Jr. (2015). Grazing systems research and impact of stocking strategies on pasture–animal production efficiencies. Crop Science, 55(6), 2513-2530. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0062

Silva, G. P., Silva, S. C., Escobar-Guttiérrez, A., Lemaire, G., & Louarn, G. (2019). Stem elongation in Pennisetum purpureum results from a fixed pattern of vegetative development potentially enhanced by the initiation of flowering. Grass and Forage Science, 74(4), 708-719. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12449

Silva, S. C., Sbrissia, A. F., & Pereira, L. E. T. (2015). Ecophysiology of C4 forage grasses understanding plant growth for optimising their use and management. Agriculture, 5(3), 598-625. doi: 10.3390/ agriculture5030598

Silva, S. C., Uebele, M. C., Congio, G. F. S., Carnevalli, R. A., & Sbrissia, A. F. (2021). Growth of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombaça as affected by grazing strategies and environmental seasonality. I. Tillering dynamics and population stability. Crop and Pasture Science, 72(1), 55-65. doi: 10.1071/CP2 0198

Silveira, M. C. T., Nascimento, D., Jr., Rodrigues, C. S., Pena, K. S., Souza, S. J., Jr., Barbero, L. M.,... Silva, S. C. da. (2016). Forage sward structure of Mulato grass ('Brachiaria hybrid' ssp.) subjected to rotational stocking strategies. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10(6), 864. doi: 10.21475/ajcs.2016. 10.06.p7568

Tedeschi, L. O. (2006). Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems, 89(2-3), 225-247. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.004

Theil, H. (1961). Economic forecasts and policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Viu, V. (2011). Ggbiplot: a ggplot2 based biplot. R Package version 0.55. Retrieved from http://www.vince. vu/software/

Voltolini, T. V., Santos, F. A. P., Martinez, J. C., Imaizumi, H., Clarindo, R. L., & Penati, M. A. (2010). Produção e composição do leite de vacas mantidas em pastagens de capim-elefante submetidas a duas frequências de pastejo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(1), 121-127. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982010 000100016

Wickham, H. (2017). Tidyverse: easily install and load the’ tidyverse’. R Package Version 1.2.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse

Wickham, H., & Chang, W. (2018). Devtools: tools to make developing R packages easier. R Package Version 1.12.0. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=devtools

Descargas

Publicado

2021-08-12

Cómo citar

Rezende, C. de P., Pereira, J. M., Magalhães, A. F., Ferreira, I. M., Homem, B. G. C., & Casagrande, D. R. (2021). How canopy structural and morphological characteristics, and forage chemical composition affect a pasture-based dairy system?. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 42(6), 3379–3398. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3379

Número

Sección

Artigos

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.