Conceptual framework for describing the environmental impacts of waste accumulation due to intensive animal production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n5supl1p2029Palabras clave:
Causal chain, DPSIR, Ecosystem services, Impact, Residual biomass.Resumen
The interaction between intensive animal production and the environment is complex and depends on the location and management practices. The waste generated from intensive animal production may represent a triggering factor for environmental pressures in the function of the volume and the characteristics, degrading environmental quality and affecting ecosystem services. The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual framework for the environmental description of the impacts caused by the accumulation of the waste from intensive animal production, integrating the causal-chain approach of the driver–pressure–status–impact–response (DPSIR) model with the causal network and ecosystem services. Therefore, a conceptual framework was developed that makes possible a comprehensive description of a set of structures and functions that interact in complex ways. The conceptual framework was validated through a case study performed within the scope of a hydrographic microbasin with intensive pig production. The conceptual framework developed made it possible to establish connections among the DPSIR components, including environmental perceptions and changes in the socioeconomic system. The impacts caused by the waste were considered as changes in the provision of ecosystem services and the socioeconomic system, identifiable in the proposed conceptual framework. The application of the conceptual framework identified the primary drivers that exert pressure on the system and has an impact on the ecosystem services, affecting the provision and regulation services. The development of this environmental conceptual framework contributes to the selection of the indicators and ecosystem services involved. This can aid in the promotion of environmental sustainability, providing subsidies for more adequate environmental policies obtained from indicators that reflect local conditions.Citas
Borja, A., Elliott, M., Handersen, J. H., Berg, B., Carstense, J., Halpern, B. S.,… Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N. (2016). Overview of integrative assessment of marine systems: the ecosystem approach in practice. Marine Ecosystem Ecology, 3(20), 1-20. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00020
Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2008). Drivers-pressure-state-impact-response. Ecological Indicators, 2, 967-970. doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00129-4
Burkhard, B., De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jørgensen, S. E., & Potschin, M. (2012b). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicator, 21, 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2012.03.008
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012a). Mapping supply, demand and budgets of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Costanza, R., Arge, R., De Groot, F. S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B.,… Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
Dale, V. H., & Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009
De Groot, R., Fisher, B., & Christie, M. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In P. Kumar (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations (Chap. 1, pp. 11-39). London: Earthscan.
Elliott, M. (2014). Integrated marine science and management: wading through the morass. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 86(1-2), 1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.026
Fernandez-Lopez, M., López-González, D., Puig-Gamero, M., Valverde, J. L., & Sanchez-Silva, L. (2016). CO2 gasification of dairy and swine manure: a life cycle assessment approach. Renewable Energy, 95, 552-560. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.056
Fundação do Meio Ambiente (2014). Instrução Normativa 11. Santa Catarina, SC. Recuperado de http://www.fatma.sc.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=32&Itemid=83
Gabrielson, P., & Bosch, P. (2003). Environmental indicators: Typology and use in reporting. EEA internal working paper. Retrieved from http://www.brahmatwinn.uni-jena.de/fileadmin/Geoinformatik/projekte/ brahmatwinn/Workshops/FEEM/Indicators/EEA_Working_paper_DPSIR.pdf
Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecocom.2010.02.008
Gómez, C. M., Delacámara, G., Jähnig, S., Langhans, S. D., Domisch S., Hermoso, V.,… O’Higgins, T. (2016). Developing the AQUACROSS assessment framework: Deliverable 3.2. Berlim. Retrieved from https://aquacross.eu/sites/default/files/D3.2_Assessment%20Framework.13012017.pdf
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018). Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the application of the revised structure. Nottingham. Retrieved from http://www.cices.eu
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2018). Áreas dos Munícipios. Recuperado de https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias-novoportal/organizacao-do-territorio/estrutura-territorial/15761-areas-dos-municipios.html?=&t=o-que-e
Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2013). Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators - a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 28, 54-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
Kelble, C. R., Loomis, D. K., Lovelace, S., Nuttle, W. K., Ortner, P. B., Fletcher, P.,… Boyer, J. N. (2013). The EBM-DPSER conceptual model: Integrating ecosystem services into the DPSIR framework. PLoS ONE, 8(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070766
Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
Kristensen, P. (2004). The DPSIR framework. Paper presented at the workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from http://wwz.ifremer.fr/dce/content/download/69291/913220/ file/DPSIR.pdf.
La Notte, A., D’Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M. L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B.,… Crossman, N. D. (2017). Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological Indicators, 74, 392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030
Lewison, R. L., Rudd, M. A., Al-Hayek, W., Baldwin, C., Beger, M., Lieske, S. N.,… Hines, E. (2016). How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 56, 110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.001
Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I.,… Lavalle, C. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
Martin, D. M., Piscopo, A. N., Chintala, M. M., Gleason, T. R., & Berry, W. J. (2018). Developing qualitative ecosystem service relationships with the driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework: A case study on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Ecological Indicator, 84, 404-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.047
Miele, M., & Waquil, P. D. (2007). Estrutura e dinâmica dos contratos na suinocultura de Santa Catarina: um estudo de casos múltiplos. Estudos Econômicos, 37(4), 817-847. doi: 10.1590/S0101-41612007000400005
Müller, F., & Burkhard, B. (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
Niemeijer, D., & De Groot, R. (2008a). Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 89-106. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9040-9
Niemeijer, D., & De Groot, R. (2008b). A conceptual framework for selecting environ-mental indicator sets. Ecological Indicators, 8(1), 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012
Omann, I., Stocker, A., & Jäger, J. (2009). Climate change as a threat to biodiversity: an application of the DPSIR approach. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.003
Oudart, D., Robin, P., Paillat, J. M., & Paul, E. (2015). Modelling nitrogen and carbon interactions in composting of animal manure in naturally aerated piles. Waste Management, 46, 588-598. doi: 10.1016/ j.wasman.2015.07.044
SA-SuAve (2018). Avaliação de indicadores e estratégias para valoração de serviços ambientais em bacias hidrográficas com produção intensiva de animais. Concórdia: EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves. Recuperado de https://www.embrapa.br/suinos-e-aves/busca-de-projetos/-/projeto/210482/avaliacao-de-indicadores-e-estrategias-para-valoracao-de-servicos-ambientais- em-bacias-hidrograficas-com-producao-intensiva-de-animais
Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., & Santolini, R. (2012). Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019
Smeets, E., & Weterings, R. (1999). Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical Report no. 25. Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC25
Svarstad, H., Petersen, L. K., Rothman, D., Siepel, H., & Wätzold, F. (2008). Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2007.03.005
Von Bertalanffy, L. (2015). Teoria geral dos sistemas: fundamentos, desenvolvimento aplicações (8nd ed.). Petropolis, RJ: Vozes.
Zhou, S., Mueller, F., Burkhard, B., Cao, X., & Hou, Y. (2013). Assessing agricultural sustainable development based on the Dpsir approach: case study in Jiangsu, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(7), 1292-1299. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60434-7
Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2008). Drivers-pressure-state-impact-response. Ecological Indicators, 2, 967-970. doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00129-4
Burkhard, B., De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jørgensen, S. E., & Potschin, M. (2012b). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicator, 21, 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2012.03.008
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012a). Mapping supply, demand and budgets of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Costanza, R., Arge, R., De Groot, F. S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B.,… Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
Dale, V. H., & Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009
De Groot, R., Fisher, B., & Christie, M. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In P. Kumar (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations (Chap. 1, pp. 11-39). London: Earthscan.
Elliott, M. (2014). Integrated marine science and management: wading through the morass. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 86(1-2), 1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.026
Fernandez-Lopez, M., López-González, D., Puig-Gamero, M., Valverde, J. L., & Sanchez-Silva, L. (2016). CO2 gasification of dairy and swine manure: a life cycle assessment approach. Renewable Energy, 95, 552-560. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.056
Fundação do Meio Ambiente (2014). Instrução Normativa 11. Santa Catarina, SC. Recuperado de http://www.fatma.sc.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=32&Itemid=83
Gabrielson, P., & Bosch, P. (2003). Environmental indicators: Typology and use in reporting. EEA internal working paper. Retrieved from http://www.brahmatwinn.uni-jena.de/fileadmin/Geoinformatik/projekte/ brahmatwinn/Workshops/FEEM/Indicators/EEA_Working_paper_DPSIR.pdf
Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecocom.2010.02.008
Gómez, C. M., Delacámara, G., Jähnig, S., Langhans, S. D., Domisch S., Hermoso, V.,… O’Higgins, T. (2016). Developing the AQUACROSS assessment framework: Deliverable 3.2. Berlim. Retrieved from https://aquacross.eu/sites/default/files/D3.2_Assessment%20Framework.13012017.pdf
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018). Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the application of the revised structure. Nottingham. Retrieved from http://www.cices.eu
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2018). Áreas dos Munícipios. Recuperado de https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias-novoportal/organizacao-do-territorio/estrutura-territorial/15761-areas-dos-municipios.html?=&t=o-que-e
Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2013). Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators - a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 28, 54-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
Kelble, C. R., Loomis, D. K., Lovelace, S., Nuttle, W. K., Ortner, P. B., Fletcher, P.,… Boyer, J. N. (2013). The EBM-DPSER conceptual model: Integrating ecosystem services into the DPSIR framework. PLoS ONE, 8(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070766
Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
Kristensen, P. (2004). The DPSIR framework. Paper presented at the workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from http://wwz.ifremer.fr/dce/content/download/69291/913220/ file/DPSIR.pdf.
La Notte, A., D’Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M. L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B.,… Crossman, N. D. (2017). Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological Indicators, 74, 392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030
Lewison, R. L., Rudd, M. A., Al-Hayek, W., Baldwin, C., Beger, M., Lieske, S. N.,… Hines, E. (2016). How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 56, 110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.001
Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I.,… Lavalle, C. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
Martin, D. M., Piscopo, A. N., Chintala, M. M., Gleason, T. R., & Berry, W. J. (2018). Developing qualitative ecosystem service relationships with the driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework: A case study on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Ecological Indicator, 84, 404-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.047
Miele, M., & Waquil, P. D. (2007). Estrutura e dinâmica dos contratos na suinocultura de Santa Catarina: um estudo de casos múltiplos. Estudos Econômicos, 37(4), 817-847. doi: 10.1590/S0101-41612007000400005
Müller, F., & Burkhard, B. (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
Niemeijer, D., & De Groot, R. (2008a). Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 89-106. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9040-9
Niemeijer, D., & De Groot, R. (2008b). A conceptual framework for selecting environ-mental indicator sets. Ecological Indicators, 8(1), 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012
Omann, I., Stocker, A., & Jäger, J. (2009). Climate change as a threat to biodiversity: an application of the DPSIR approach. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.003
Oudart, D., Robin, P., Paillat, J. M., & Paul, E. (2015). Modelling nitrogen and carbon interactions in composting of animal manure in naturally aerated piles. Waste Management, 46, 588-598. doi: 10.1016/ j.wasman.2015.07.044
SA-SuAve (2018). Avaliação de indicadores e estratégias para valoração de serviços ambientais em bacias hidrográficas com produção intensiva de animais. Concórdia: EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves. Recuperado de https://www.embrapa.br/suinos-e-aves/busca-de-projetos/-/projeto/210482/avaliacao-de-indicadores-e-estrategias-para-valoracao-de-servicos-ambientais- em-bacias-hidrograficas-com-producao-intensiva-de-animais
Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., & Santolini, R. (2012). Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019
Smeets, E., & Weterings, R. (1999). Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical Report no. 25. Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC25
Svarstad, H., Petersen, L. K., Rothman, D., Siepel, H., & Wätzold, F. (2008). Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2007.03.005
Von Bertalanffy, L. (2015). Teoria geral dos sistemas: fundamentos, desenvolvimento aplicações (8nd ed.). Petropolis, RJ: Vozes.
Zhou, S., Mueller, F., Burkhard, B., Cao, X., & Hou, Y. (2013). Assessing agricultural sustainable development based on the Dpsir approach: case study in Jiangsu, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(7), 1292-1299. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60434-7
Descargas
Publicado
2020-08-07
Cómo citar
Bühring, G. M. B., Silveira, V. C. P., Miranda, C. R. de, & Bernardo, E. L. (2020). Conceptual framework for describing the environmental impacts of waste accumulation due to intensive animal production. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 41(5supl1), 2029–2046. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n5supl1p2029
Número
Sección
Artigos
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Os Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados são de direito da revista. Em virtude da aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores.
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
