Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841Keywords:
Phytotoxicity, Glycine max, Yield, Selectivity.Abstract
Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.
Downloads
References
Almeida, F. A., Bruscke, E. L., Polizel, A. C., Petter, F. A., Hamawaki, O. T., & Alcântara, F., Neto. (2013). Desempenho agronômico de linhagens e cultivares de soja frente a doenças foliares. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 56(2), 88-94. doi: 10.4322/rca.2013.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/rca.2013.014
Alonso, D. G., Constantin, J., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Biffe, D. F., Raimondi, M. A., Gemelli, A., & Carneiro, J. C. (2010). Selectivity of glyphosate in tank mixtures for RR soybean in sequential applications with mixtures only in the first or second application. Planta Daninha, 28(4), 865-875. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582010000400020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000400020
Banzatto, D. A., & Kronka, S. N. (2008). Experimentação agrícola (4a ed.). FUNEP.
Barros, A. C., Monteiro, P. M. F. O., Furtado, X. C., Nunes, J., Jr., & Guerzoni, R. A. (2005). Tolerância de cultivares de soja aos herbicidas imazaquin, diclosulam e sulfentrazone, aplicados em solo de textura arenosa. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 4(1), 1-8. doi: 10.7824/rbh.v4i1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v4i1.5
Belfry, K. D., Shropshire, C., & Sikkema, P. H. (2015). Tolerance of identity preserved soybean variedades to pre-emergence herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95(4), 719-726. doi: 10.4141/cjps-2014-351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-351
Belfry, K. D., Shropshire, C., & Sikkema, P. H. (2016). Identity-preserved soybean tolerance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technology, 30(1), 137-147. doi: 10.1614/WT-D-15-00082.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00082.1
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2022). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos: safra 2021/22. CONAB.
Constantin, J., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Cavalieri, S. D., Arantes, J. G. Z., Alonso, D. G., & Roso, A. C. (2007). Estimativa do período que antecede a interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da soja, Var. Coodetec 202, por meio de testemunhas duplas. Planta Daninha, 25(2), 231-237. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582007000200001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000200001
Dalazen, G. E., Kaspary, T., Markus, C., Pisoni, A., & Merotto, A., Jr. (2020). Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha, 38, e020225717. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (2021). Previsão do tempo. EPAGRI. https://ciram.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/previsao-municipio/
Fornazza, F. G. F., Constantin, J., Machado, F. G., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Silva, G. D. da, & Rios, F. A. (2019). Selectivity of pre-and post-emergence herbicides to very-early maturing soybean cultivars. Comunicata Scientiae, 9(4), 649-658. doi: 10.14295/cs.v9i4.2755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2755
Gazola, T., Dias, M. F., Belapart, D., Castro, E. B., & Bianchi, L. (2016). Efeitos do diclosulam na soja cultivada em solos de diferentes classes texturais. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 15(4), 353-361. doi: 10.7824/rbh.v15i4.483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i4.483
Gazola, T., Gomes, D. M., Belapart, D., Dias, M. F., Carbonari, C. A., & Velini, E. D. (2021). Selectivity and residual weed control of pre-emergent herbicides in soybean crop. Revista Ceres, 68(3), 219-229. doi: 10.1590/0034-737X202168030008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x202168030008
Kuva, M. A., Salgado, T. P., & Revoredo, T. T. O. (2016). Experimentos de eficiência e praticabilidade agronômica com herbicidas. In P. A Monquero, Experimentação com herbicidas (pp. 75-97). São Carlos.
Lamego, F. P., Fleck, N. G., Bianchi, M. A., & Schaedler, C. E. (2004). Tolerância à interferência de plantas competidoras e habilidade de supressão por genótipos de soja - II. Resposta de variáveis de produtividade. Planta Daninha, 22(4), 491-498. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582004000400002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400002
Lima, D. B. C., Silva, A. G., Procópio, S. O., Barroso, A. L. L., Dan, H. A., & Costa Braz, A. J. B. P. (2011). Seleção herbicidas para o controle de plantas de soja resistentes ao glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 10(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v10i1.94
Mahoney, K., Tardif, F., Robinson, D., Nurse, R., & Sikkema, P. (2014). Tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L.) to protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors and very long chain fatty acid synthesis inhibitors applied preemergence. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(8), 1117-1124. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.58124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.58124
Monquero, P. A., Silva, P. V., Silva Hirata, A. C., Tablas, D. C., & Orzari, I. (2010) Leaching and persistence of sulfentrazone and imazapic. Planta Daninha, 28(1), 185-95. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582010000100022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000100022
Nordby, D., Alderks, D., & Nafziger, E. (2007). Competitiveness with weeds of soybean cultivars with different maturity and canopy width characteristics. Weed Technology, 21(4), 1082-1088. doi: 10.1614/WT-06-190.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-190.1
Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Constantin, J., Meschede, D. K., & Maciel, C. D. G. (2002). Controle de plantas daninhas e seletividade de diclosulam aplicado em pré-emergência na cultura da soja. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 3(1), 69-74. doi: 10.7824/rbh.v3i1.375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v3i1.375
Oliveira, A. M., Neto, Constantin, J., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Guerra, N., Blainski, E., Dan, H. A., & Alonso, D. G. (2017). Fall management of fleabane based on glyphosate+2, 4-D, MSMA and glufosinate applied isolated or in tank mixture with residual herbicides. African Journal of Plant Science, 11(5), 151-159. doi: 10.5897/AJPS2017.1537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2017.1537
Osipe, J. B., Oliveira, J., Constantin, J., Biffe, D. F., Rios, F. A., Franchini, L. H. M., Gheno, E. A., & Raimondi, M. A. (2014). Selectivity of combined applications of herbicides in pre and post-emergence for the glyphosate tolerant soybean. Bioscience Journal, 30(3), 623-631.
Raimondi, M. A., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Constantin, J., Franchini, L. H. M., Blainski, E., & Raimondi, R. T. (2017). Weed interference in cotton plants grown with reduced spacing in the second harvest season. Revista Caatinga, 30(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n101rc DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252017v30n101rc
Reddy, K. N. & Locke, M. A (1998). Sulfentrazone sorption, desorption, and mineralization in soils from two tillage systems. Weed Science, 46(4), 494-500. doi:10.1017/S0043174500090950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500090950
Salomão, P. E. A., Ferro, A. M. S., & Ruas, W. F. (2020). Herbicidas no Brasil: uma breve revisão. Research, Society and Development, 9(2), e32921990-e32921990. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i2.1990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i2.1990
Santos, H. G., Jacomine, P. K. T., Anjos, L. H. C., Oliveira, V. A., Lumbreras, J. F., Coelho, M. R., Almeida, J. A., Araujo, J. C., Fº., Oliveira, J. B., & Cunha, T. P. F. (2018). Brazilian soil classification system (5nd ed.). EMBRAPA.
Silva, A. F., Ferreira, E. A., Concenço, G., Ferreira, F. A., Aspiazu, I., Galon, L., Sediyama, T., & Silva, A. A. (2008). Densidades de plantas daninhas e épocas de controle sobre os componentes de produção da soja. Planta Daninha, 26(1), 65-81. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582008000100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100007
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (2016). Manual de calagem e adubação para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Palloti.
Souza, R. G., Cardoso, D. B. O., Mamede, M. C., Hamawaki, O. T., & Sousa, L. B. (2019). Desempenho agronômico de soja, sob interferência de plantas infestantes. Revista Cultura Agronômica, 28(2), 194-203. doi: 10.32929/2446-8355.2019v28n2p194-203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32929/2446-8355.2019v28n2p194-203
Szmigielski, A., Schoenau, J., Johnson, E., Holm, F., Sapsford, K., & Liu, J. (2009). Development of a laboratory bioassay and effect of soil properties on sulfentrazone phytotoxicity in soil. Weed Technology, 23(3), 486-491. doi: 10.1614/WT-08-122.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-122.1
Taylor-Lovell, Wax, L., & Nelson, R. (2001). Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin1. Weed Technology, 15(1), 95-102. doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0095:PRAYOS]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0095:PRAYOS]2.0.CO;2
Vasconcelos, M. C. C., Silva, A. F. A., & Lima, R. S. (2012). Interferência de plantas daninhas sobre plantas cultivadas. ACSA - Agropecuária Científica no Semi-Árido, 8(1), 1-6. doi: 10.30969/acsa.v8i1.159
Walsh, K. D., Soltani, N., Hooker, D. C., Nurse, R. E., & Sikkema, P. H. (2015). Taxa biologicamente efetiva de sulfentrazone aplicada em pré-emergência em soja. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 95(2), 339-344. doi: 10.4141/cjps-2014-264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-264
Zobiole, L. H. S., Oliveira, R. S., Jr., Huber, D. M., Constantin, J., Castro, C., Oliveira, F. A., & Oliveira, A. (2010). Glyphosate reduces shoot concentrations of mineral nutrients in glyphosate-resistant soybeans.Plant and Soil, 328(1), 57-69. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0081-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0081-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Semina: Ciências Agrárias adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.
