Sensitivity of urolithiasis detection using urinary, radiography and ultrasound parameters

Authors

  • Charles Silva de Lima Universidade de Franca
  • Cristiane Alves Cintra Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Adriana Érica Wilkes Burton Meirelles Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Sofia Borin Crivellenti Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Orlando Marcelo Mariani Universidade de Franca
  • Daniel Kan Honsho Universidade de Franca
  • Aureo Evangelista Santana Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Marileda Bonafim Carvalho Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Julio Carlos Canola Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Leandro Zuccolotto Crivellenti Universidade de Franca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n6p3599

Keywords:

Canine, Crystalluria, Stones, Urine.

Abstract

Although many information has been published regarding canine urolithiasis, sensitivity of radiography, ultrasound and urinary parameters have been poorly correlated with number, size, and composition of the stones. One hundred and thirteen clinical files of dogs with diagnosis of urolithiasis were retrospectively selected. Information regarding number, appearance, location, size, and composition of the stones were noted after surgical removed. Urolithiasis data was compared with radiographs and ultrasound images and urinalysis parameters. Pure struvite was found in 42.4% and calcium oxalate in 35.6%. Survey radiographs enabled the detection of radiopaque stones and when an ultrasound examination was also performed, the sensitivity was increased. Double contrast radiography enabled identification in 100% of radiolucent stones, and allowed for size measurement and number counts in 76.9% of radiolucent stones. Crystalluria had low sensitivity (31.5%) and specificity (58.8%). Hematuria (96.3%) and leukocyturia (61.1%) were the most common parameters found. We concluded that double contrast radiography can be considered the method of choice for detection of radiolucent stones. Crystalluria is not a good parameter to detect or predict type of stone. Hematuria and leukocyturia, although non-specific findings, can be used as triage for investigation of urolithiasis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Charles Silva de Lima, Universidade de Franca

Discente de Mestrado, PPG em Ciência Animal, Universidade de Franca, UNIFRAN, Franca, SP, Brasil.

Cristiane Alves Cintra, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Discente de Doutorado, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Adriana Érica Wilkes Burton Meirelles, Universidade Estadual Paulista

M.e, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Sofia Borin Crivellenti, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Profª Drª, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, UFU, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Orlando Marcelo Mariani, Universidade de Franca

Médico Veterinário, Universidade de Franca, UNIFRAN, Franca, SP, Brasil.

Daniel Kan Honsho, Universidade de Franca

Prof. M.e, UNIFRAN, Franca, SP, Brasil.

Aureo Evangelista Santana, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Prof. Dr., UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Marileda Bonafim Carvalho, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Profa Dra, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Julio Carlos Canola, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Prof., Dr., UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Leandro Zuccolotto Crivellenti, Universidade de Franca

Prof. Dr., PPG em Ciência Animal, UNIFRAN, Franca, SP, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-23

How to Cite

Lima, C. S. de, Cintra, C. A., Meirelles, A. Érica W. B., Crivellenti, S. B., Mariani, O. M., Honsho, D. K., … Crivellenti, L. Z. (2017). Sensitivity of urolithiasis detection using urinary, radiography and ultrasound parameters. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 38(6), 3599–3604. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n6p3599

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.