An update on the epidemiologic situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil

Authors

  • Eleine Kuroki Anzai Universidade de São Paulo
  • Daniele da Costa Instituto de Defesa Agropecuária e Florestal do Espírito Santo
  • Alba Luisa Pereira Ribeiro Said Superintendência Federal de Agricultura do Espírito Santo
  • José Henrique Hildebrand Grisi-Filho Universidade de São Paulo
  • Marcos Amaku Universidade de São Paulo
  • Ricardo Augusto Dias Universidade de São Paulo
  • Fernando Ferreira Universidade de São Paulo
  • Jason Onell Ardila Galvis Universidade de São Paulo
  • Vitor Salvador Picão Gonçalves Universidade de Brasília
  • Marcos Bryan Heinemann Universidade de São Paulo
  • Evelise Oliveira Telles Universidade de São Paulo
  • José Soares Ferreira Neto Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3437

Keywords:

Bovine, Brucellosis, Prevalence, Risk factors, Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was carried out between January 2012 and May 2014 to estimate the prevalence of bovine brucellosis in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. This study was carried out 11 years after the implementation of the immunization program for heifers with a vaccine derived from the S19 strain of Brucella abortus. The state was divided into two regions. Three hundred farms from each region, with reproductive activity, were randomly chosen and included as primary sample units. A fixed number of cows were randomly selected and tested for antibodies against Brucella spp. A farm was considered to be infected when at least one female tested positive for Brucella spp. In the selected farms, an epidemiological questionnaire based survey, focused on herd traits as well as husbandry and sanitary practices, was conducted, to evaluate the factors associated with the risk of infection. The overall prevalence of infected herds was 9.3% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 7.1–11.8%), varying from 8.7% (95% CI = 5.7–12.6%) in region 2 to 9.7% (95% CI = 6.8–13.4%) in region 1. There was no significant difference in the prevalence between the regions. The apparent prevalence of Brucella spp. positive farms across the regions and the state was similar to the prevalence observed 11 years earlier. The prevalence of positive animals was 3.8% (95% CI = 0.9–10.1%), varying from 1.5% (95% CI = 0.8–2.4%) in region 1 to 7.9% (95% CI = 1.9–20.3%) in region 2, without a significant difference between the regions. There was no difference in the number of Brucella spp. positive animals after 11 years of the immunization program. The risk factors associated with brucellosis were (i) more than 10 cows per herd (OR = 5.0; 95% CI =2.5–11.1) and (ii) equipment, feedstock, or personnel sharing (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.1–4.2). The state of Espírito Santo should seek systematic vaccination coverage targeting more than 80% of the eligible heifers. An efficient animal health program, which educates the farmers to test replacement animals for brucellosis before introducing them to their herds, to avoid equipment, personnel or feedstock sharing with farms of unknown sanitary conditions, and to increase awareness of the importance of good sanitary procedures during artificial insemination, should be implemented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Eleine Kuroki Anzai, Universidade de São Paulo

Discente do Programa de Pós-Graduação. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Daniele da Costa, Instituto de Defesa Agropecuária e Florestal do Espírito Santo

Médica Veterinária, Instituto de Defesa Agropecuária e Florestal do Espírito Santo, IDAF, Vitória, ES, Brasil.

Alba Luisa Pereira Ribeiro Said, Superintendência Federal de Agricultura do Espírito Santo

Fiscal da Superintendência Federal de Agricultura do Espírito Santo, SFA-ES, Vitória, ES, Brasil.

José Henrique Hildebrand Grisi-Filho, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Marcos Amaku, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Ricardo Augusto Dias, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Fernando Ferreira, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Jason Onell Ardila Galvis, Universidade de São Paulo

Discente do Programa de Pós-Graduação. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Vitor Salvador Picão Gonçalves, Universidade de Brasília

Prof., Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília, UNB, Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Marcos Bryan Heinemann, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Evelise Oliveira Telles, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

José Soares Ferreira Neto, Universidade de São Paulo

Prof., Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-09

How to Cite

Anzai, E. K., Costa, D. da, Said, A. L. P. R., Grisi-Filho, J. H. H., Amaku, M., Dias, R. A., … Ferreira Neto, J. S. (2016). An update on the epidemiologic situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 37(5Supl2), 3437–3448. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3437

Issue

Section

Articles