Criminal administrative law: for a civil police force that is more autonomous in relation to criminal law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2025v29n1p118-128Keywords:
civil police, dejudicialization, penal minimalism, police mediation, restaurative justiceAbstract
The treatment given to incidents of minor offensive potential in police stations has not achieved satisfactory levels of performance, because excessive judicialization does not promote social pacification. The objective of the research is to systematize the main ideas that underpin the paths towards a more efficient civil police force outside of criminal law, presenting theoretical elements of criminal minimalism and specifying the material limits to the repressive action of the police apparatus. To this end, an explanatory research was outlined, using documentary and bibliographic sources. The deductive method was used to instigate reflection on the possibility of a more efficient police action based on the promotion of human rights, without using punishment as the goal to be achieved. It is concluded that criminal law needs to be seen as an exceptional measure in conflicts of lesser severity, which is why it is possible to conceive of an administrative criminal law, focused on consensual methods of conflict resolution, which not only better serve the interests of the parties, but also more adequately comply with the principles that govern state action.
Downloads
References
ALEXY, Robert. Derecho e razón prática. México: Fontamara, 1993.
ANDRADE, Léo Rosa de. Liberdade privada e ideologia. São Paulo: Acadêmica, 1993.
BARATTA, Alessandro. Criminologia crítica e crítica do direito penal. 6. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan, 2011.
BATISTA, Nilo. Introdução crítica ao direito penal brasileiro. 12. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2011.
BATISTA, Nilo; ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raúl; ALAGIA, Alejandro; SLOKAR, Alejandro. Direito Penal Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2011.
BIANCHINI, Alice. Pressupostos materiais mínimos da tutela penal. São Paulo: Editora dos Tribunais, 2002.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2025.
BRASIL. Lei n. 12.830, de 20 de junho de 2013. Dispõe sobre a investigação criminal conduzida pelo delegado de polícia. Brasil: Presidência da República, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12830.htm. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2023.
CANOTILHO, José Joaquim. Direito Constitucional. 5. ed. Coimbra: Almedida, 1992.
CNJ - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Justiça em números - 2024. Brasília, DF: CNJ, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/pesquisas-judiciarias/justica-em-numeros/. Acesso em 14 fev. 2025.
CONDE, Muñoz. Introducción al derecho penal. Barcelona: Bosch, 1975.
DIAS, Jorge de Figueiredo. Direito penal português. Lisboa: Aequitas, 1993.
FRAGOSO, Heleno Cláudio. Lições de direito penal: parte geral. 10. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1986.
GRECO, Rogério. Direito penal do equilíbrio. Niterói, RJ: Impetus, 2020.
LISZT, Franz Von. Tratado de direito penal Alemão. Tomo I. Rio de Janeiro: F. Briguiet, 1899.
MAÑAS, Carlos Vico. O princípio da insignificância como causa excludente da tipicidade penal. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1993.
MARX, Karl. Crítica da filosofia do direito de Hegel. Tradução de Rubens Enderle e Leonardo de Deus; supervisão e notas Marcelo Backes. 2. ed. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
OLIVARES, Quinteros. Introducción al derecho penal. Barcelona: Barcanova, 1981.
RADBRUCH, Gustav. Filosofia do direito. Tradução de L Cabral de Moncada. 6. ed. Coimbra: Arménio Amado, 1979.
SARRULE, Oscar Emilio. La crisis de legitimidad del sistema jurídico penal: abolicionismo o justificación. Buenos Aires: Universidad, 1998.
SECCHI, Leonardo. Análise de políticas públicas: diagnóstico de problemas, recomendação de soluções. São Paulo: Cengage Learining, 2022.
TOLEDO, Francisco de Assis. Princípios básicos do direito penal. 5. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1994.
ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raúl; PIERANGELLI, José Henrique. Manual de direito penal Brasileiro. 6. ed. rev. e atual. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2006. v. 1: parte geral.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 João Victor Tayah Lima, Dorli João Carlos Marques, Sylvia Laureana Arruda da Silva Cabral Chaves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal's articles are of their sole responsibility.
