CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n1p102Keywords:
Gaps, Integrity, Judicial activismAbstract
This paper discusses the possible recognition of constitutional gaps and loopholes, using the perspective of law as integrity. The objective of this study is to deliberate about the connection between constitutional gaps and integrity using a famous legal controversy: the constitutional viability of same-sex unions, decided by the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 4277. Therefore, what we aim to show is that, while examining the issue, the rulings of the Supreme Court´s and other courts were falsely justified based on answers for the constitutional gap, which escaped the limits of appropriate judicial reasoning.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-04-28
How to Cite
Lacerda, B. A., & Müller, J. M. de S. (2016). CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE. Scientia Iuris, 20(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n1p102
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal’s articles are of their sole responsibility.