Appropriacy of spontaneous accusation in the installment of tax debts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2009v13n0p305Keywords:
Installments, spontaneous accusation, systematic interpretation, principle of speciality.Abstract
Spontaneous accusation as well as installment of tax debts have a specific function in the legal order. The search for its concepts and foundations is necessary in order to solve controversies generated by the interpretation of the norms that rule such instances, which have not been taken into account by court decisions. Antinomies are created where there is none, preventing such instances from fulfilling the mission of accomplishing fundamental principles and rights. Once the paradigms that prevent the systematic interpretation of the rules that sustain such instances are overcome, it is concluded that the spontaneous accusation is the specific rule that does not collide with the rules of tax debt installment, which can be applied whenever the subject in tax debt has the initiative of paying the debts before any action by the tax authorities, even if the payment is in installments.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal's articles are of their sole responsibility.













