Scientometric indicators of scientific output and collaboration on the acknowledgments thematic (1980-2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n4p245Keywords:
Acknowledgments, Scientific output, Scientific collaboration, Indicators scientometrics, ScientometricAbstract
Objective: It investigates characteristics of worldwide literature about the acknowledgments thematic from the 1980-2019 period, indexed on the Web of Science (WoS) database through scientometric indicators of scientific output and collaboration.
Methodology: It characterized as an exploratory and descriptive study which employs quantitative techniques (scientometric) to analyze all the papers covered by the Information Science & Library Science subject category, using Bibexcel and Pajek softwares.
Results: The distribution of the 105 papers about acknowledgments reveals a steady growth tendency during this period. The significant increase since 2009 may have been a result of the work on automatic harvest and processing of acknowledgment data started by the WoS in 2008. Foreign journals written in English lead the productivity and impact ranking, emphasizing the internationalization and quality of the scientific output. The indicators point to two generations of researchers on the acknowledgments thematic, the first standing out in analysis of usage, frequency and prevalence of acknowledgment support type; and the second in funding information analysis. Although the co-authorship identified in the papers might not represent a high level of network connections, they portray factual collaborative links of an intra-institutional nature.
Conclusions: It concluded that the findings achieved so far symbolize the effort of these researchers in a thematic field that is not new, but that is changing due to the arise of new opportunities to obtain acknowledgments data.
Downloads
References
BEN-DAVID, J. Introdução. In: Sociologia da Ciência. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FGV, 1975. p. 1-32.
BOURDIEU, P. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004.
BOZEMAN, B.; LEE, S. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, 2003, Denver. Proceedings [...] Denver: AAAS, 2003.
CRONIN, B. Let the credits roll: a preliminary examination of the role played by mentors and trusted assessors in disciplinary formation. Journal of Documentation, v. 47, n. 3, p. 227-239, 1991.
CRONIN, B. Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information sciences. Journal of Documentation, v. 57, n. 3, p. 329-464, may 2001.
CRONIN, B.; OVERFELT, K. The scholar's courtesy: A survey of acknowledgement behaviour. Journal of Documentation, v. 50, n. 3, p. 165- 196, 1994.
CRONIN, B.; WEAVER, S. The praxis of acknowledgement: from bibliometrics to influmetrics. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, Madrid, v.18, n. 2, p. 172-177, 1995.
CRONIN, B.; MCKENZIE, G.; STIFFLER, M. Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, v. 48, n. 2, p. 107-253, jun. 1992.
CRONIN, B.; MCKENZIE, G.; RUBIO, L. The norms of acknowledgement in four humanities and social sciences disciplines. Journal of Documentation, v.49, n. 1, p. 1-102, mar. 1993.
CRONIN, B.; SHAW, D.; LA BARRE, K. A cast of thousands: co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of Psychology and Philosophy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 9, p. 855- 871, jul. 2003.
CRONIN, B.; SHAW, D.; LA BARRE, K. Visible, less visible, and invisible work: patterns of collaboration in 20th century Chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, n. 2, p. 160-168, 2004.
DÍAZ-FAES, A. A.; BORDONS, M. Making visible the invisible through the analysis of acknowledgements in the humanities. Aslib Journal of Information Management, v. 69, n. 5, p. 576-590, 2017.
GILES, C. L.; COUNCILL, I. G. Who gets acknowledged: measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 101, n.51, p. 17599-17604, 2004.
HAYASHI, M. C. P. I. Evidências bibliométricas do reconhecimento científico em resenhas e entrevistas: notas teóricas e modelo de análise. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 18, p. 1-31, 2020.
HAYASHI, M. C. P. I. Agradecimentos em artigos científicos: o ponto de vista de pesquisadores. Prisma.com, Porto, n. 37, p. 55-70, 2018
HAYASHI, M. C. P. I.; BELLO, S. F. Presença dos agradecimentos em um periódico da área de Saúde. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 20, n. 3, edição especial, p. 166-193, 2014.
HEFFNER, A. Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 3, n. 1, p. 5-12, 1981.
HIRSCH, J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 102, n. 46, p. 16569-16572, nov. 2005.
HOCHMAN, G. A ciência entre a comunidade e o mercado: leituras de Kuhn, Bourdieu, Latour e Knorr-Cetina. In: PORTOCARRERO, V. (org.). Filosofia, história e sociologia das ciências: abordagens contemporâneas. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 1994. p. 199-231.
HYLAND, K. Dissertation acknowledgements: the anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication, v. 20, n. 3, p. 242-268, 2003. KATZ, J. S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 1, p. 31-43, 1994.
KATZ, J. S.; MARTIN, B. R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, Amsterdam, n. 26, p. 1-18, 1997.
KNORR-CETINA, K. D. Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Social Studies of Science, v. 12, n. 1, p. 101-130, 1982.
KRETSCHMER, H.; ROUSSEAU, R. Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 52, n. 8, p. 610-614, 2001.
KUHN, T. S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1997.
LATOUR, B.; WOOLGAR, S. A vida de laboratório: a produção dos fatos científicos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 1997.
MCCAIN, K. W. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in Genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, v. 16, n. 4, p. 491-516, 1991.
MERTON, R. K. Sociologia - teoria e estrutura. São Paulo: Mestre Jou, 1968.
MERTON, R. K. O efeito Mateus na ciência II. A vantagem cumulativa e o simbolismo da propriedade intelectual. 1988. In: MARCOVICH, A.; SHINN, T. (org.). Ensaios de Sociologia da Ciência. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2013. p. 199-231.
PATEL, N. Collaboration in the professional growth of American Sociology. Social Science Information, v. 12, n. 6, p. 77-92, 1973.
PAUL-HUS, A.; DESROCHERS, N.; PECOSKIE, J.; LARIVIÈRE, V. Acknowledgment research genealogy for today’s quantified academia. In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 43., 2015, Ottawa. Proceedings […] Ottawa: CAIS, 2015.
PAUL-HUS, A.; DESROCHERS, N.; COSTAS, R. Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science. Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 108, n. 1, p. 167-182, 2016.
SALAGER-MEYER, F.; ARIZA, M. Á. A.; BERBESÍ, M. P. “Backstage solidarity” in Spanish and English written medical research papers: publication context and the acknowledgment paratext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 2, p. 307-317, 2009.
SALAGER-MEYER, F.; ALCARAZ-ARIZA, M. Á.; LUZARDO BRICEÑO, M.; JABBOUR, G. Scholarly gratitude in five geographical contexts: a diachronic and cross-generic approach of the acknowledgment paratext in medical discourse (1950–2010). Scientometrics, v. 86, n. 3, p. 763-784, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
O conteúdo dos textos e a citação e uso de imagens submetidas são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.
Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a Informação & Informação.