Early reading assessment instruments: abilities and processes involved

Authors

  • Helena Cristina Weirich UFSC
  • Ana Cláudia de Souza UFSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2237-4876.2017v20n1p110

Keywords:

Avaliação de leitura, Processamento da linguagem, Habilidades básicas de leitura

Abstract

This study investigated the following early reading assessment instruments: “Bateria de Recepção e Produção da Linguagem Verbal” (SCLIAR-CABRAL, 2003a) and “Teste de Competência de Leitura de Palavras e Pseudopalavras” (SEABRA-CAPOVILLA, 2010). The main research goal is to analyze in each one of the reading assessment instruments some of the multiple cognitive processes and basic low-level abilities involved in reading. Decoding, word recognition, lexical access, syntactic and textual processing, and comprehension are the cognitive processes taken into account. As regard basic reading abilities, fluency, considering rhythm, prosody and speed, and accuracy are considered. The results indicate that each one of the analyzed reading assessment instruments assesses different aspects of the reading processes and abilities, through off-line measures. Scliar-Cabral’s assessment battery allows the researcher or the teacher to evaluate the following processes: the grapheme opposition in minimal pairs of words and in sentences, and the identification of difficulties in sentence processing, in decoding the graphemic-phonemic relationship, and in textual comprehension. In its turn, the reading assessment instrument proposed by Seabra and Capovilla, allows one to evaluate student’s reading development level, by classifying the kind of processing as logographic, alphabetic or orthographic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Helena Cristina Weirich, UFSC

Mestranda do Progragrama de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da UFSC. Área de concentração: Psicolinguística.

Published

2017-05-06

How to Cite

WEIRICH, Helena Cristina; DE SOUZA, Ana Cláudia. Early reading assessment instruments: abilities and processes involved. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 110–135, 2017. DOI: 10.5433/2237-4876.2017v20n1p110. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/22981. Acesso em: 25 dec. 2024.